NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11228-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11242-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 August 2010. It was not persuaded that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11249-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11253-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 10. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11259-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 August 2010. After careful consideration of your application, the Board concluded that your application was not timely filed, and that Lt would not be in the interest of justice to excuse your failure to submit your application ina timely manner. The Board concluded that you were aware of alleged error or injustice in your record at the time of your discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11260-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 July 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11264-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11272-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11275-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11278-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show a change in reason for discharge and reentry code. The Board, consisting of Mr. Preiffer, Mr. Clemmons, and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 December 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11281-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 9 October 2006, you were honorably released from active duty and transferred to the Navy Reserve upon completion of your required active...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11291-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 © (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry dated 8 February 2007, a copy of which is in enclosure (1). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Garst, Leeman and ,.Mann, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10 December 2009, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11292-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 WJH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s widow, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to World War II Prisoner of War (POW) Promotion Back Pay. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11293-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was voluntarily transferred to the Fleet Reserve after completing more than 20 years of active service. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11294-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11300-09
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this ‘Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 6 November 2008 the Naval Discharge Review Board upgraded your bad conduct discharge to a discharge under other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11303-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 January 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11312-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Family Separation Allowance-Restricted (FSA-R) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 18 January 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11314-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11316-09
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 8 March 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In July 2009, after 11 months of paying SBP premiums, Petitioner submitted another DD Form 2656 to DFAS seeking to decline coverage for SBP, with spousal concurrence, (enclosure (4)). Under Title 10 U.S. Code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11324-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11336-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 20 April 1984, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable (OTH) discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11337-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in a three NJPs and one SPCM conviction. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the , existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11338-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. George, and Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 November 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11339-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct. @onsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the yexistence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11341-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. On 20 December 1993, you were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11345-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 2010. On 29 December 2008 you received an entry level separation by reason of fraudulent entry and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11347-09
- A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) dated 1 and 15 December 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11349-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct that resulted in a SCM and a SPCM conviction. ponsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval “record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the fprtstence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11358-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 November 2009. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11361-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted ef your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is imp a presumption of regularity attaches to a Consequently, when applying for a correcti naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11363-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11370-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11371-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 10 July 2003, you submitted a written request for an other than honorable (OTH) discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11372-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed removing the uncontested report for 16 January to 24 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11373-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were notified of pending administrative discharge processing with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge due to misconduct due to commission...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11374-09
The Board also considered an advisory opinion furnished by the Naval Personnel Command (NPC) attached as enclosure (2) that recommended no relief be granted. Note: If the special evaluation had been factored into Petitioner’s PMA before the examination, Petitioner would have reached the Final Multiple Score necessary to advance from the March 2008 Navy- wide advancement cycle. The Board carefully considered the comments included in enclosure (2) to the effect that a special evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11377-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 25 April 2000 an administrative discharge board (ADB) recommended that you be discharged under other than honorable conditions by reason of homosexuality, with the execution of the discharge suspended for 12 months in order to serve sufficient time for retirement. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11378-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in’executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11380-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. You received the BCD after appellate review was complete. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11385-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on two occasions for failure to go to your appointed place of duty and unauthorized absence (UA) from your unit for a period of four days. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11386-09
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 31 March to 5 October 2007. and “completed most tasks when supervised and.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11387-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 Februiary 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11400-09
(“Professional Military Education”) from *C” (fifth best} to “D.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material a submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11404-09
, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval” Records, sitting in executive session, considered your , application on 4 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. — Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11406-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11407-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR vice USN. foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11410-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 August 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11412-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. to:the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter - referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR). The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11413-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she reenlisted USNR vice USN. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code...