DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 CRS
Docket No: 11242-09
11 August 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title.10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 August 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 27 September
2006. On 25 November 2006 you received an entry level separation
by reason of fraudulent entry and were assigned a reentry code of
RE-4, as required by governing directives.
The Board concluded that your present reentry code was properly
assigned. It was not persuaded that it would be in the interest
of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code as an
exception to policy. Accordingly, your application has been
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEI
Executive Dir
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06849-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 July 2010. The Board concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code, and that you have not demonstrated that it would be in the interest of justice for the Board to assign a more favorable code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03890-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ‘your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board was not persuaded that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code as an exception to policy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09377-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. It concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code in view of the nature of those disorders.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09735-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As a reentry code of RE-4 is required in the case of a Sailor discharged by reason of fraudulent entry, there is no basis for Changing the code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05669-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0289 14
A three- -member panel of the Board ‘for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your a application on 12 March 2014. The Board found that the assignment of an RE-1C reentry code was warranted by the counseling entry of 15 February 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12555-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06398-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2010. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11387-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 Februiary 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 02835-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 April 2010. An RE-3F reentry code is the most favorable code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to physical standards. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.