NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07759-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that she be reinstated to pay grade E-5/PC2, her time in rate date be reflected on her last DD Form 214 and that she receive all backpay and allowances she would have received as an E-5. She served honorably and reenlisted into the regular Navy on 3 November 2008 with an approved enlistment waiver from Commander, Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07761-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07770-09
7770-09 20 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO_ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Subject’s naval record 1.. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). CONCLUSION Upon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07773-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board, Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07783-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF ‘NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for Source Rate (EBSR), and Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07784-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07787-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 January 2010. Documentary evidence considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07789-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations ,. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07792-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2009. In addition, the Board concluded that you failed to submit any new material evidence or other matter in support of your request for reconsideration of your application for “correction of your record to show that you were retired by reason of physical disability; accordingly, the Board denied that request. Absent such additional evidence, further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07795-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board has no authority to consider claims of legal error at a court-martial, and must limit its review to determining whether clemency is ‘warranted ‘in the sentence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07796-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 February 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07797-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2010. At the time of your service, a conduct average of 3.0 was required for a fully shonorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07798-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20870-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07805-09
-A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2010. In this regard, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07807-09
O7807-09 2 November 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she was not retired on 1 June 2009, put continued on active duty after that date; and that she was promoted, pursuant to her selection by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07818-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07827-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval | Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07833-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. to the provisions of reference {a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07838-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07841-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07842-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07847-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ‘aw After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07848-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2010. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reason for discharge due to the diagnosed physical disability that existed prior to your entry into the Navy. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07852-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 October and 17 November 2008, copies of which are attached, and your rebuttal. NN Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07853-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07856-09
Sep 09 (3) Subject’s naval record 1.. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 October 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07857-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07858-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010 Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that your general discharge and reenlistment code should not be changed due to your diagnosed personality disorder and insufficiently high conduct mark average. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07867-09
7867-09 17 Nov 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy . Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Full Time Support (FTS), Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07868-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 07868-09 26 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07871-09
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments : (2) CNRC memo 1133 Ser 32/ of 29 Oct 09 (3) Subject’s naval record ‘ 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to ag Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board ‘requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07873-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your two NJP’s, SCM, and conviction by SPCM for very serious misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07874-09
The other contested report, for 1 February 2002 to 31 January 2003, during which the convening authority acted, documents Petitioner’s conviction by GCM. Finally, it incorrectly indicated that Petitioner requested “redaction” of only one fitness report, his report of 31 January 2002, and recommended removing that report. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, notwithstanding enclosure (2) and especially in light of enclosures (3), (4) and (5), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07875-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2010. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07877-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010. On 23 March 1990, you were notified of pending administrative separation action with an other than honorable (OTH) discharge for misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07884-09
7884-09 6 October 2009 Dear 4 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552... A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07885-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner requested an extension of the one-year period in which to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense when transferred to the Fleet Reserve. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, - reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 10...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07886-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 7886-09 19 Jan 10 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07890-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your contentions that you were transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve and should have been advanced to PN3. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07893-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s former spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show a timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2010 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07898-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07899-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected to show a change in characterization of service as well as the reentry code issued on 4 January 2008. Tea ev icwed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 January 2010 and, pursuant to 1ts regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The NPC also advised that the RE-4 reentry code...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07900-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, / hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was discharged for a reason other than fraudulent entry, and that she be assigned a reentry code that will permit her to reenlist. She reported a history of sensitive skin and treatment by a dermatologist when she was a child.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07904-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 20 August 2009, a copy of which is attached. Be Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07908-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2010. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07914-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 March 2010. After careful and conscientious consi@eration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07918-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2010. The Board concluded that you were aware of the alleged error or injustice in your record when you were released from active duty in 1994 and discharged by reason of misconduct/drug abuse in 1995, witha discharge under other than honorable conditions. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07920-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, ‘sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07922-09
BR three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07926-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...