’ DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
BUG
Docket No: 7847-08
23 October 2009
UT a So Sac es
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.
You requested completely removing the fitness report for 1 July
1999 to 30 June 2000.
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has
directed modifying the contested report by removing, from
section I (reporting senior’s “Directed and Additional
Comments”), “Will handle all assigned responsibilities when
given specific guidance.” and removing the entire section K
(reviewing officer’s marks and comments).
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 22 October 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of
this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
consisted of your application, together with all material
submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable
statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board
considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps
Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 11 February
2009, a copy of which is attached.
‘aw
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board .
substantially concurred with the comments contained in the
report of the PERB. Accordingly, your application for relief
beyond that effected by CMC has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to
have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new
and material evidence or other matter not. previously considered
by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in’ mind
‘chat a presumption of regularity attaches to all official
records: Consequently, when applying for a correction of an
official naval record, the burden is on the applicant: to.
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Sincerely,
Dosis |
W. DEAN FRR
Executive rector
Enclosure
Copy to:
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 03521-09
However, in only 60 days since the end of his last reporting period, I cannot say that he has moved up in his peer ranking.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 June 2009. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) dated 1 April 2009, a copy of which is attached. Removal of the fitness reports for the periods 19990101...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09222-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the report for 27 February to 21 April 2008 as you requested, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09264-09
Tt is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested report by removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer's marks and comments), “With continued effort MRO [Marine reported on] should be considered for promotion with peers.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09257-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the contested neport by removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer's marks and comments), “and issued NPLOC [nonpunitive letter of caution] on May 7th, 2007.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12153-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07415-08
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2009. In addition, the Board considered the three reports of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 July and 20 October 2008 and 3 June 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08535-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC} has directed modifying the contested fitness report by removing, from section I (reporting senior’s (RS’s) “Directed and Additional Comments”), “[You are] capable of producing bigger and better performance and work.” A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08239-09
It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has directed modifying the report for 10 January to 28 February 2006 by removing, from section K.4 (reviewing officer's comments), ‘- Physical fitness improved during the reporting period.” and further directed completely removing the report for 1 March to 24 April 2006. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2009. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08573-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, Sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2009. Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate-the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11633-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...