DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 7914-09
13 April 2010
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 10 March 2010. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
‘your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consi@eration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 26 May 1960 and
reenlisted numerous times during your 18 years, 9 months, and 25
days of qualifying service for retired pay. You had 3 years, 9
months, and 25 days of active duty followed by Navy Reserve
service of which 15 years were gualifying and 5 periods were not
qualifying. On 13 May 2004 you received an honorable discharge
due to expiration of term of service.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors such as your family problems and
overall record of service, but found it insufficient to warrant
approval of your request since you did not complete sufficient
service to qualify for retirement. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
eas
W. DEAN PFEERF
Executive Diredtar
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04266-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04954-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00823-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2011. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice regarding constructive service for completion of a minority enlistment. In your case, your minority enlistment expired on 25 January 1970.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 11080-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 July 2010. On 13 June 1983, you were honorably discharged from the Navy Reserve and were recommended for reenlistment. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 12528-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 03004-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 June 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04112-10
As your request for upgrade of your bad conduct discharge was denied by the Board on 22 October 1997, and you have not submitted any new material evidence of error or injustice in connection with that discharge, the Board limited its review to your request for correction of your record to show that you were separated or retired by reason of physical disability. You were separated from the Navy on 5 June 1981 with a bad conduct discharge upon the completion of the appellate review of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13350-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 December 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. pcoonsequently, wher, applying for a correction of an official naval ‘record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the gexistence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06493-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2010. As you have not demonstrated that you were unfit for duty by reason of physical disability on 14 August 1970, rather than unsuitable for service due to a personality disorder, there is no basis for recommending corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06591-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...