NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00694-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 fe) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00695-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00696-09
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/ateachnents (2) NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/149 dtd 23 Mar 09 (3) Subject'’s naval record 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00698-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00699-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records sitting in executive session on 9 December 2009 determined that you had not submitted any new material evidence or other matter in support of your request for further consideration of your original application and, therefore, that further consideration of that application was not warranted. concluded that as your RE code was assigned properly, and no other code is authorized, there is no basis for granting your request for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00700-09
The Board, consisting of Ms. Colbert and Messrs. Storz and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 2 April 2009, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. In correspondence attached as enclosure (4), the HOMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner’s request to remove the service record page llb entry has commented to the effect that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00701-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your mistaken belief that you would be eligible to reenlist after the passage of a certain period of time, despite your adverse reentry code, is not probative of the existence of material error or injustice in your naval record, and does not provide a basis for granting your request. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00703-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify Enlistment/Reenlistment document Armed Forces of the United States. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00705-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00706-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00707-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00708-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navel record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00712-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your misconduct that resulted in three NJP’s, periods of UA...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00714-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2009. However, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant any change in your RE-4 reenlistment code, given your record of two NUP’s for misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00716-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2009. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your misconduct that resulted in a period of UA totaling over four years, and your request for discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00719-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of: .- your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00722-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the NPC dated 16 March 2009 with enclosure, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00725-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC) . The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsaiman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00728-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00729-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record he corrected to establish entitlement to an Enlistment Bonus for College Credit (EBCC), and the Loan Repayment Program (LRP) . Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00731-09
On 20 June 1988, you received NUP for wrongful use of marijuana and UA. Additionally, after your third NUP, you were counseled and warned that further | misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.. On 27 June 1988, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. Board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00734-09
— A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 7 May 1985, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to drug use.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00739-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 17 November 2003 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the Navy with a discharge under other than honorable conditions...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00740-09
Naval - Records, sitting in executive session, considered your |... application on 28 October 2009. On 13 October 1964, administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of misconduct due to unfitness. by the Board... .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00745-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 June 2009. The Board found that your final disability rating was based on an assessment of the level of impairment caused by your disabilities, rather than on the number of years of creditable service you completed. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00751-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 March 2010. Your receipt of disability rating from the VA is not probative of the existence of error or injustice in your naval record, because the VA awarded those ratings without regard to the issue of your fitness for military duty as of the date of your release from active duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00757-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 HD: hd Docket No, 00757-10° 28 January 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: | Secretary of the Navy Sub}: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD: Ref: - (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he was not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00772-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was advanced to E5/SGT on 1 August 2003, prior to her separation from active duty on 24 August 2003. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 April 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00776-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. 776-09 12 May 2009 - From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the previsions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00786-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00787-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 787-09 9 June 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy . , ge Ref: (a) Tatle 10 U.S.C. Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record 1.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00794-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 February 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00801-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus {SRB} . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Zsalman, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 May 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00804-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, yeguiations and policies. In addition, had a history of suicidal ideation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00805-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to reestablish entitlement to a zone “B” and “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. George, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00806-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion, except to note you did not request removing any service record page 13 ("Administrative Remarks") entry. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00807-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00808-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2010. In addition, the Board considered the advisory | opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 25 February 2009, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00813-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY | BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted in paygrade E-3, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and 4salman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00816-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 June 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00819-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2009. that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct, and that you were counseled and warned concerning the consequences of further misconduct prior to committing further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00820-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00822-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, reconsidered your case on 22 October 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Office of the Chief of Naval Operations dated 1 June 2009 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 17 June and 9 July 2009, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00823-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2009. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 2 August 1999, administrative discharge action was initiated to separate you by reason of erroneous entry, drug abuse.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00825-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 November 2009. The Board also concluded that you received the benefit of your bargain with the Navy when your request for discharge was granted and you should not be permitted | to change it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00827-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00829-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner requested an extension of the one-year period in which to ship his household goods (HHG) incident to his transfer to the Retired List. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 April 2009 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00832-09
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as he was not married and had no eligible beneficiary. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00836-09
836-09 20 October 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter ‘referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected -to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00838-09
838-09 25 Feb 09 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Exnicios, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 February 2009 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in...