DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Jf 2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TAL
Docket No: 00819-095
20 November 2009
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 12 November 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
‘regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations,
You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of active duty on
26 December 1995 at age 26. On 9 June 1998, you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for insubordinate conduct and
failure to obey an order. On 11 June 1998, you were counseled
and warned. that further misconduct could result in administrative
discharge action. on 13 February 1999, you received NUP for
three instances of insubordinate conduct. Based on the
misconduct due to a pattern of misconduct. In connection with
this processing, you would have acknowledged the separation
action and the discharge authority would have approved a
recommendation for separation. The record clearly shows that on
26 March 1999, you were discharged with a general discharge under
honorable conditions by reason o i
misconduct.
The Board, in its review of your application, carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth, overall
record of service, character reference letters, and post service
accomplishments. Nevertheless, the Board found that these
factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your
discharge given the seriousness of your misconduct, and that you
were counseled and warned concerning the consequences of further
misconduct prior to committing further offense. The Board found
that you were fortunate to have received a general discharge,
Sincerely,
‘\
W. DEAN
Executive °
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00867-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, after your second NJP, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02196-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 17 November 1997 at age 19. on 13 December 1998 following an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR458 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 October 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06984-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 29 December 1992, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06384-09
After careful and’ conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The Board concluded that as the assianment of a reentry code of RE-4 is required when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct, there is no basis for any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08000-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 22 November 2005 an ADB recommended discharge under honorable conditions by reason of convenience of the government due to alcohol rehabilitation failure. On 2 February 2006 you were so discharged and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07811-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 8 February 2002, you were once again counseled about your conduct and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative separation action. In this regard, an RE-4 reenlistment...
NAVY | DRB | 2000_Navy | ND00-01052
The NDRB also advised that the board first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 981022 honorable by reason of unsatisfactory performance (A). The applicant is reminded that he is eligible for a personal appearance hearing provided the application is received within 15 years from the date of discharge.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06977-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Additionally, you were counseled and warned that further misconduct could result in administrative discharge action. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00657-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 July 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant changing the reason for discharge, reenlistment code or...