DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: g04-09
21 August 2009
rection of your
ns of title 10 of the United
naval record pursuan
States Code section 1552.
dad for Correction of Naval
BA three-member panel of the Boar
ssion, considered your
Records, gitting in executive s¢
application on 19 August 2009.
injustice were reviewed in accordan
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, yeguiations
and policies.
consideration of the entire
e evidence submitted was
probable material
an the Navy on 10 September
valuation on 27 January 2007
ustment disorder with
lity traits. In addition,
had a history of suicidal ideation. On
discharged by reason of a condition, not
rformance of duty. You
mitted by regulatory
d that you enlisted
t psychiatric e
osis of an adj
derline persona
The Board foun
2003. You underwen
and were given a diagn.
depressed mood and bor
it was reported that you
29 January 2007 you were
a disability, that interfered with your Pe
were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, as per
guidance.
ssigned a reentry
ssigned to Sailors
e of a mental disorder, particularly in
£ suicidal ideation. The
those cases where there is a history ©
adjustment disorder does
fact that you no longer suffer from an
hat you should have received a more favorable
t of a different
who are discharged becaus
not establish t
reentry code in 2007, ox warrant the assignmen
code at this time. accordingly, your application has been
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
denied.
furnished upon request.
It 16 regretted thal the circumstances of y
favorable action cannot be. taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07494-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2009, Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board carefully considered the medical evidence you submitted in support of your application but found it insufficient to warrant corrective action in your case. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04945 12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 7O1S. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 March 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11189-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13798-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2011. after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error of injustice. Subsequently, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of convenience of the government due to your diagnosed depressive disorder,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02469-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 August 1999. The record reflects that on 30 June 1998 you were referred to a mental health unit because of suicidal ideation, inability to tolerate authority, and a prior undisclosed history of psychiatric treatment. Separation by erroneous entry is authorized when an enlistment would not have occurred if a disqualifying factor had been known prior to enlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06145-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 June 2012. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reentry code which was correctly assigned based on your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00140-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 May 2009. Accordingly, and as RE-3P is the most favorable reentry code that may be assigned to a Marine discharged by reason of a personality disorder, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01269-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0431 14
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered our application on 14 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes,. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official ‘Naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05443-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...