Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00807-09
Original file (00807-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX TRG

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 807-09
17 March 2009

 

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 3 March 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You were released from active duty and transferred to the Navy
Reserve on 13 February 1968 with three years and 19 days of
active service. The anniversary year ending on 13 February 1969
is qualifying for reserve retirement. On 14 April 1971 you
reenlisted in the Navy Reserve and then earned 15 qualifying
years for reserve retirement. On 10 November 1985 you were
transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve because of
unsatisfactory participation. You were honorably discharged on 3
April 1991 at the expiration of your last enlistment. Therefore,
your record shows 18 years and 19 days of qualifying service for
reserve retirement.

You became 60 years of age on 11 February 2007 and in January
2009 you applied to the Board requesting various corrections to
your record so that you would be eligible for reserve retirement.
You point out that you first entered the Navy on a minority
enlistment which allowed four years credit in the computation of
service needed to transfer to the Fleet Reserve and if you were

credited with this service you would have |}? years of qualifying
service. You then requested that you be given credit for a
period of | ime when you worked for the Navy as a civilian

employee.

Regulations in effect at the time allowed jor crediting of four
years service for transfer of active duty members to the Fleet
Reserve of members on a minority enlistment who served less than
four years. However, the law only allows for crediting of the
actual active duty time served for the computation of reserve
retirement. Finally periods of time served as a civilian
employee are not creditable. It appears that you were eligible
to reenlist in April 1991 but did not do, so for some unknown

reason. Given the passage of time no other information is
available.

Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely, \

\ Sak

W. DEAN PF
Executive Di ¢

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09850-06

    Original file (09850-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    References (b) through (d), in effect at the time of Petitioner’s transfer, reference the plenary authority of the Secretary of the Navy to transfer a member to the Fleet Reserve in a reduced paygrade. Regulations in effect at the time of Petitioner’s transfer reference the plenary authority of SECNAV to transfer a member to the Fleet Reserve in a reduced paygrade. On 7 January 2004, Petitioner, a chief petty officer (E-7), was authorized by ASN(M&RA) to transfer to the Fleet Reserve,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07087-11

    Original file (07087-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    d. The Petitioner filed a Complaint of Wrongs regarding his denial of retention on active duty and being discharged from the Navy. In other words, JAG/AL specifically recommended that - ASN(M&RA), acting for the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV), make the determination to correct the record, vice this Board, if warranted. On 15 July 2011, after review of the Complaint of Wrongs by ASN(M&RA), the Board was directed to review the Complaint of Wrongs and provide a recommendation to correct the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 04118-10

    Original file (04118-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A Navy medical record dated 23 October 2000 (AR 352) indicates that you “recently retired”. In addition, your name and Fleet Reserve status would have been listed in the DEERS database, which is consulted by medical personnel when there is a question concerning a patient’s right to medical care at a military medical treatment facility. A service member does not enter on active duty and/or become entitled to active duty pay simply because a Department of the Navy officer or employee orally...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140015803

    Original file (20140015803.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He is requesting to be properly credited with all Reserve service performed specifically from 7 February 1991 through 27 December 1994, to indicate that this service was performed as an USAR Warrant Officer aviator on AD during the mobilization in support of the Active Army Requirements for Desert Shield/Storm. He requested voluntary AD retirement and was retired on 31 October 1999. d. The law is clear at the time the applicant was separated in 1996 and 1999 in order to qualify for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10286-02

    Original file (10286-02.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    104—450, see 1996 U.S. Code Cong.and Adm. News, p. 238.House Report No. (b)(1) as so designated, substituted “under this section” for “under this chapter”, and added subsecs. Amendment to this section by section 635(b) of Pub.L.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02277-00

    Original file (02277-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 2277-00 20 February 2001 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD 0 (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Petitioner had been retained on active duty as required by law, Since an she would have completed her service and been retired. This is consistent with the However, the Board notes .that if Board- § 1176 were applicable The Board notes the Therefore,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090018942

    Original file (20090018942.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged on 31 August 1994 as a result of being “medically unfit for retention standards.” At the time of discharge, he had completed 14 years, 8 months, and 2 days of service for non-regular retirement. The applicant should be placed on the retired list in his retired rank/grade of SGT/E-5, effective 12 March 2009, the date he turned 60, and paid all retired pay due as of this date. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02064-00

    Original file (02064-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record , From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps submitted an application to this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 15 April 1998 but was retained in the Marine Corps until he qualified to retire. "has an alternate weight standard The fitness report 68" At that time, he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08299-00

    Original file (08299-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested correction of your record to show your voluntary resignation from the Naval Reserve on 30 June 1991, rather than involuntary discharge on 31 December 1994 by reason of two failures of selection to lieutenant commander. his in All members of the Ready Reserve, including IRR members, are 4. required by law to be considered by promotion selection boards, whether or not they are actively participating. It was during this time that he stopped active participation with his unit,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01832-02

    Original file (01832-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Specifically, Petitioner requests to be retired (b) requires TO years active commissioned service Reference 2. to retire as an officer. request was erroneously processed through PERS-822; while correcting that error, Navy as an officer while a member of the Fleet Reserve and only served 5 years, service. If I indeed do not have the 10 years required to retired as an officer, I certainly have the more than thirty years total active and inactive service to allow me retirement at the highest...