DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX ‘
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 7502-09
29 September 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United .
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on’ 23 September 2009, Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was -
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 15 February
2007... On 10 August 2007 you were diagnosed with a psychotic
disorder that existed prior to your enlistment. Your were
separated from the Navy with an entry level separation on 12
September 2007, by reason of a condition, not a disability, which
interfered with your performance of duty. You were assigned a
reentry code of RE-4, as permitted by governing directives.
The Board was not persuaded that your reentry code was assigned
in error, or that its continued presence in your record is
unjust. Your belief that you were misdiagnosed is not probative
of the existence of material error or injustice in your naval
record, and does not provide a basis for granting your request.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Tt is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken, You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its: decision upon submission-of new and material ~
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
WH onc
W. DEAN PF F
Executive Dilrec
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04004-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval- Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 December 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08140-09
.Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Since you have been treated no differently than others in your situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of your reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 09137-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 08405-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 August 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official navai record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04549-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that it would not be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07580-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden*is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07027-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application ori 29 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05049-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 04394-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 June 2009. The Board was not persuaded that it would be in the interest of justice to assign you a more favorable reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11666-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...