NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05857-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05859-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 13 June 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05860-08
A three~member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05865-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05867-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05868-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 BAN Docket No. 05868-08 18 August 2008 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05871-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered a letter furnished by the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) dated 27 November 2007, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05874-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 duly 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05884-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Z2salman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1i August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05886-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your deceased husband's naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Per reference (a), recommend BCNR not correct record to reflect that he enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05888-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 13 June 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05889-08
1552 Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record i. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a}, Petitioner, a former member of the Navy Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged: on 25 January 2007. The DD Form 214 issued at that time shows that he was a petty officer first class, but the pay grade was entered as E-5, d. On release from active duty,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05892-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 13 June 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05894-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application om 20 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found no merit in your request for removal of the nonjudicial punishment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05895-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 March 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. You had prior naval service from 1972 to 1987, and received honorable discharges and were recommended for reenlistment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05904-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. Shortly thereafter, you had the following NJP’s: on 26 November 1980, for UA; on 5 October 1982, for UA and missing ship’s movement; and on 3 February 1983 for the illegal use of a controlled substance (marijuana). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05907-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. We have carefully reviewed case and provide the following comments.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05909-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05919-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "B"” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05920-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2009. However, on 17 February 1989, your suspended reduction was vacated due to further misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05921-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a member of the United States Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting that an entry showing that he received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) on 19 January 2002 be removed from the Marine Corps Total Force System (MCTFS). ceviewed Petitioner's allegation error and injustice on 5 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05923-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that as a result of your prior periods of honorable service, you may be eligible for veterans’ benefits.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05930-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potential mitigation, such as your youth, regret for your misconduct, substance abuse, and period of honorable service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05934-08
— A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05936-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05941-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05944-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05946-08
You requested, in effect, that the fitness report for 9 June to 25 August 2006 be modified, in accordance with the reporting (RS’s) letter dated 2 June 2008, by raising the marks senior’s in sections D.1 (“Performance”), D.2 (“Proficiency”), F.2 (“Developing Subordinates”), F.4 (‘Ensuring Well-being of Subordinates”) and G.2 (“Decision Making Ability”) from “D” (fourth best of seven possible marks) to “E” (third best); and section G.1 (“Professional Military Education”) from “E” to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05951-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2009. The Board did not consider the issue of your entitlement to a disability rating from the Department of Veterans Affairs {VA) for a back condition in addition to the 40% rating you receive for the residuals of the gunshot wound to your buttocks, as that issue is within the purview of the VA rather than the Department of the Navy. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05952-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify and cancel an extension, and cancel and execute a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05953-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05954-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05958-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 26370-5100 Docket. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Record, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2009. Your request must include newly discovered relevant evidence which was not reasonably available to you when you submitted your application.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05961-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regarding your contentions, there is no evidence in the record to show that you ever requested or were denied treatment for alcohol abuse, but...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05965-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05966-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05967-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05970-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05975-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05976-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 July 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05980-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 June 1978, you requested an OTH discharge for the good of the service to avoid trial by court-martial for the 298 day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05981-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JSR Docket No: 5981-98 14 August 2008 ion, considered your Your allegations of error and dance with administrative , your naval reco , the Board considered the quarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 18 June 2008, a copy of which is attached. , the Board substantially contained in the report of the PERB. Accordingly, your application has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05992-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05993-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 September 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05995-08
The Board, consisting of Ms. Humphrey and Messrs. W. Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05996-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2008 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06002-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 23 August 2006 you received an entry level separation by reason of your failure to meet medical/physical procurement standards, and were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, The Board noted that applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry code to Sailors who are...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06004-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, gitting in executive session, considered your applicatidn on 4 September 2008. your allegations of error and injustice |were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application. Those regulations are not arbitrary; rather, they are rationally related to furthering the Navy’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06008-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with ali material submitted in support - thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, it is clear from the record that you had no participation in the Navy Reserve for nearly a year and that you did not respond to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06010-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 September 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. VEAP era Service members were allowed to convert and contribute to the MGIB program during two conversion periods in 1996 and 2001, if they opened and made contributions to...