DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG
Docket No: 6008-08
11 May 2009
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
. States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 6 May 2009. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with ali material submitted in support
- thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After. careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 21 May 2002. At the end of
your first anniversary year on 20 May 2003 you were credited with
105 retirement points. In the next anniversary year, you were
only credited with 45 retirement points. The record shows no
further reserve participation. In April 2005 you were sent a
Notification of Separation Processing by registered - mail to the
address on file at the reserve center... You were never responded.
On 21 May 2005 the discharge authority directed a general
discharge due to unsatisfactory participation and the assignment
of an RE-4 reenlistment code.
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your initial period of
good reserve service and contention that you had moved and that a
reserve unit close to your new home did not send a transfer
request to your old unit as you had requested. You desire a
change in the reenlistment code so that you can reenter the Navy.
However, it is clear from the record that you had no
participation in the Navy Reserve for nearly a year and that you
did not respond to the notification of your discharge processing.
This was certainly. your last and best opportunity to present your
version of events. Since you apparently never contacted your
service unit concerning your situation, the Board concluded that
your discharge and reenlistment code were proper.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. -
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of régularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
Rank D [a
ROBERT D.~ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06872-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 28 February 2008 you were sent a notification of separation processing due to unsatisfactory participation by registered mail. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02912-97
PRIMUS Every Naval Reservist received an Annual Retirement Point Record from the Naval Reserve Personnel Center which specifically delineates how many points were earned and what type of drill/duty was performed during the member's anniversary year. COMNA..SFORINST Navy. With this change, Petitioner 6 months and 17 days of He will be eligible nonpay retirement points in Therefore, The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02243-01
~ l l members of the Ready Reserve (including the Individual Ready Reserve) are required by law to be considered by promotion boards, whether or not they are actively participating. Per Title 10, U.S. Code, Chapter 1407, a lieutenant commander who has at least twice failed of selection and has completed 20 years of commissioned service must transfer to the Retired Reserve, if eligible, or be discharged. 0 was notified, per reference (c) , that he had become subject to the attrition...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09584-05
Docttmentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable ~tatutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Army on 23 July 1968 and served on active duty until you were honorably...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11329-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMS Docket No: 11329-08 16 January 2009 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05507-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. The Board noted that there are many individuals in the reserve component that have missed qualifying years by a few points who have had to serve additionai years in order to qualify for Since you can remain a member of the Marine Corps retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07390-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. However, at the end of your anniversary year, on 10 October 1968, you were only credited with 37 retirement points. Therefore, at the end of the 10 October 1970 anniversary year you were only credited with 19 retirement points.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03670-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 January 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10453-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 May 2009. You state in your application that it was the intent of the Marine Corps to retire you as a colonel effective on 1 October 1996. Since you agreed to retire on 1 October 1996 and did not, the Board concludes that the record should not be corrected to show that you retired as a colonel on 1 August 1997.
CG | BCMR | Other Cases | 2009-054
SUMMARY OF THE RECORD On September 8, 1986, the applicant enlisted in the Coast Guard Reserve for eight years. The applicant stated that she was transferred to the IRR because of downsizing and unit disbandment and that the letter she received dated November 21, 1995, “said it all and it should be considered.” The letter told her that she would receive more information soon, but she did not. The letter dated November 21, 1995, however, supports the applicant’s contention that she was...