NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06012-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade E-2, vice E-1. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 October 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06017-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2009. Unfortunately you only served for a little less than one year and three months and were separated with an other than honorable discharge (OTH) due to frequent disciplinary actions. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06025-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 May 2009. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 23 July and 5 September 2008, copies of which are attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06026-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 18 February 1983, you were so discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06027-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DJC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. George, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06032-08
6032-08 26 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO ner eee Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “aA” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06036-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100CRG Docket No: 6036-08 29 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: FORMER @ii-erweee REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting his naval record be corrected by changing the reentry code he was assigned on 14 February 1994. On 27 January 1994...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06042-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely election of the REDUX Retired Pay Plan with a lump sum payment of the Career Status Bonus (CSB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Boyd, Mr. W. Hicks, and Ms....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06045-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06046-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06049-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2008. Dotumentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence|of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06050-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06051-08
of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06052-09
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 November 2009. Therefore, on 24 August 2009, you were separated with an honorable discharge and an RE-4 reenlistment code due to a personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06054-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The evaluation concluded by recommending discharge due to your diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06055-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 July 2009. Because a mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable discharge you In its review of your application the Board concluded that in view of your frequent acts of misconduct and failure to attain a mark of 4.0 in military behavior your discharge was proper as issued and should not be changed now as a matter of clemency. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06056-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by setting-aside the nonjudicial punishment imposed on him on 3 November 2005. and 2. c. On 22 August 2008 an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps opined that the punishment imposed on Petitioner was disproportionate to the offense committed. Accordingly, the opinion recommended that Petitioner’s request for relief be granted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06061-08
This is e naval rec A three-mé Records, applicatid injustice regulation Board. Your allegations of error and were reviewed in accordance with administrative S and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this cumentary material considered by the Board consisted plication, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. tly, when applying for a correction of an official ord, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06062-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for his prior duty. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06067-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2009. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was : insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06068-08
6068-08 15 September 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USN vice USNR(FTS) . The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Exnicios, and Mr. Butherus, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06069-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 May 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06070-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06071-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner applied to this Board requesting her naval: records be corrected by changing the reentry code she was assigned on 20 May 2008. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 July 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. On 20 May 2008, she was separated from the Navy with an entry level separation by reason of her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06074-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner applied for and received an extension of the 180- day period in which to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense incident to her release from active duty. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06077-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable Statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06078-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06080-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As you have not demonstrated that you were discharged in error, and as your present reentry code is the most favorable code authorized for Sailors discharged by reason of physical disability, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06084-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your record shows that you served on active duty in the Navy from 13 January 1987 until 12 January 1989 when you were honorably discharged.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06085-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX TRG WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 6085-08 1 May 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF %%& —pe Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former member of the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he qualified for reserve...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06087-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06090-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06093-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 September 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06094-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. 6094-08 14 Oct 08 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO —-— or, ‘ Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06099-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January ‘2009. The Board did not consider whether your characterization of service or reason for separation should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06101-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Regulations authorize assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to members who are discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder and are considered a potential risk to harm themselves or others if retained. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06115-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) as he was not married and had no eligible beneficiary. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06118-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 February 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 7 June 1966 the command recommended you for an undesirable discharge due to the civil conviction but also recommended that the discharge be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06121-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting inlexecutive session, considered your application on 8 Septembey 2008. Documentary material considered lby the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable |statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applilcant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06128-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06130-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 2 September 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06138-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 29 August 1984, you were also counseled regarding your misconduct, informed where substance abuse assistance was available, and warned that further infractions could result in disciplinary action or an other than honorable (OTH) discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06139-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 April 2009. In addition, the Board considered the decision of the Navy Discharge Review Board (NDRB) dated 28 April 2008, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06146-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06151-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06160-08
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject enrolled his spouse in the Reserve Component Survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) prior to his retirement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 August 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06162-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. During the period 4 April to 10 August 1978, you were in a UA status, a period of about 128 days. On 15 August 1979, the separation authority approved the recommendation and directed an OTH discharge by reason of misconduct due to frequent discreditable involvement.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06163-08
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board did not consider whether your reason for separation Should be changed, since you have not exhausted your administrative remedies by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB). Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06165-08
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) program. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06172-08
06172-08 25 August 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject’s widow, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Subject enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) pursuant to the BARBER decision. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and...