DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
CRS
Docket No: 10116-07
20 June 2008
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 June 2008. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy Reserve on 20
December 1990. You received nonjudicial punishment and were
convicted by a summary court-martial. Your offenses included
drunk and disorderly conduct on two occasions, hitting a Sailor
with your fists, and communicating a threat.
On 22 December 1991 your commanding officer recommended that you
be separated with a discharge under other than honorable
conditions by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious
offense. When informed of the recommendation for separation, you
waived the right to present your case to an administrative
discharge board. After review by the discharge authority, the
recommendation for separation was approved and on January 1992
you were separated with a discharge under other than honorable
conditions, and assigned a reentry code of RE-4.
Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reentry
code when an individual is discharged by reason of misconduct.
Since you have been treated no differently than others in your
Situation, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the
assignment of your reentry code. Accordingly, your application
has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel
will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
WwW
. DEAN PFE
Executive Dikdc
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 06353-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board carefully considered your contentions to the effect that your reentry code should be corrected because you were not afforded the right to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04482-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10381-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2008. After being informed of the recommendation for separation, you waived the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08455-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting executive session, considered ~OUT application on 28 November 2007. On 22 February 1995 an administrative discharge board recommended that you be separated with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct/commission of a serious offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08175-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2008. On 28 April 1988 your commanding officer recommended that you be separated from the Navy Reserve with a discharge under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense, i.e., the 47 seven day period of unauthorized absence. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4860-13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive. ‘Documentary : material considered by the Board consisted of your application, tegether with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05046-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. An RE-4 reentry code must be assigned to all Sailors discharged due to misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 00985-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 November 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, an RE-4 reentry code is appropriately assigned when an individual is discharged for misconduct and is not recommended for retention.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05457-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 February 2011. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regul@ions and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. However, the Board concluded that neither your reentry code nor your separation code should be changed due your NUP for larceny. The Board also noted that you were fortunate to receive a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4937 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 January 2014. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...