Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04281-06
Original file (04281-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



 DJC
 Docket No. 4281-06
7 Nov 06


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 U SC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, si t ting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP Memo 1530 Ser N133D/ dtd 2 Nov 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
                                             Sincerely

W.       DEAN PFEFFER
Executive Di rector



Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
CHIEF OF NAVAL PERSONNEL
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20370-5000

         IN REPLY REFER TO
1530
                                                                                          SER N133D/

         From:    Deputy Chief of Naval Operations (MPT&E) (N133D)
          To:      Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR)
        
         Sub j:     ____
        Ref:      (a) NAVADMIN 125/06 DTG 022150 NAY 06
1.       has requested via the BCNR, to cancel his extension dated 21 April 2006 and be allowed to reenlist under Enlisted Supervisory Retention Pay (ESRP) program.
2.       After a complete review of his request, it is forwarded recommending no action.
3.       Although ESRP was in place at the time, Zone D covering years 16 to 20 did not become part of the program until May 06 (ref a) . Ref a (3) specifically states that the effective date of the new ESRP zone 0 is the date of the NAVADMIN (02 May 06) . The members extension became operative before the program was available and therefore will not be able to receive bonus money for the amount of time that the extension covers.
-
                                                       Nuclear Enlisted Community Manager

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09122-05

    Original file (09122-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9122-05 7 Nov 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 November 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05465-06

    Original file (05465-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO 1530 Ser N133D/313 dtd 04 Octp 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09253-09

    Original file (09253-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to, the provisions of reference (a} Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. g. The Petitioner was discharged on 30 November 2006...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07496-09

    Original file (07496-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1} with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected. The Petitioner executed a 12 month agreement to extend enlistment, (NAVPERS 1070/621) operative on or about 2¢ August 2008. c. The Petitioner executed a 23 month agreement to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05931-10

    Original file (05931-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Enlisted Supervisor Retention Program (ESRP) bonus. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03545-07

    Original file (03545-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    3545-07 31 October 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Enlisted Supervisor Retention Pay (ESRP) Program.2. Shy, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11826 14

    Original file (NR11826 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an immediate reenlistment contract. reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 25 November 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 01007-09

    Original file (01007-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    ' DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "C” Enlisted Supervisor Retention Program ({ESRP). CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10458-08

    Original file (10458-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 November 2009. However, there is no entitlement to the unpaid portion of the bonus which has not yet been paid or earned. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06563-06

    Original file (06563-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 4811/561 dtd 21 Sep 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...