Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04346-06
Original file (04346-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                             2 NAVY ANNEX
                                                      WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100



                                                     
DJC
                                                                                          Docket No. 4346-06
                                                                                         
27 September 2006


From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy

Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. J552

End:     (1) JJD Form 149 w/attachrnents
(2)      NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/ 476 of 4 Aug 06
(3)      Subject’s naval record

1.       Pursuant to the provis io ns of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the Petitioner’s record and data files reflect an extended EAOS of 14 November 2007.

2.       The Board, consisting of Mr. Haney, Mr Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3.       The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.




Docket No. 4346-06
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:

a.       The Petitioner’s record and data files to reflect an extended EAOS of 14 November 2007.

b.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
        
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS, I II
Recorder         Acting Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



27 September 2006




                                                               W. DEAN PFEIFFER        
                                                               Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04766-06

    Original file (04766-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTT(9102) rating/NEC.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Dietrich, and Mr. Koman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 3 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03464-06

    Original file (03464-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The 20 month NAVPERS 1070/621 extension agreement, operative on or about 14 June 2006, is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00648-06

    Original file (00648-06.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to execute an extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Messrs, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and January 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06572-06

    Original file (06572-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice an 8 year term.2. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06579-06

    Original file (06579-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. Shy, and Ms. McCormick reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10167-06

    Original file (10167-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10151-06

    Original file (10151-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USN, vice USNR.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Hicks, J., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05325-06

    Original file (05325-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10159-06

    Original file (10159-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Geisler, Mr. George, and Mr. Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05954-06

    Original file (05954-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Frankfurt, Mr. Geisler, and Mr. Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...