NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10536-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the petitioner elected to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Ivins, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10546-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and ‘policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 7 October 1965 you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 17 with parental consent. On 9 February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10548-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to payment of per diem in excess of 179 days.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Ivins, Pfeiffer, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10555-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2007. As you did not exhaust an available administrative remedy by applying to the Naval Discharge Review Board for upgrade of your discharge, the Board’s review was limited to your request for a more favorable reentry code and the expunction of the diagnosis of a personality disorder from your record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10558-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafterreferred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Boardrequesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be correctedto show the petitioner enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent24 month extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr. Hicks, J., reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10569-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 10569-06 17 July 2007 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF 3_gyieinsiaiiiiieigialaamia Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10574-06
10574-06 31 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 2336.2. The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10583-06
Your previous case, docket number 7199-06, was denied on 7 September 2006. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10597-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 27 August 1974 at age 18. You began appellate leave on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10601-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by memorandum 1070 MNSB-13, 27 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10603-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he received a reentry code of RE-i. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on ii January 2007, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. That Petitioner’s naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10607-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10611-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes., regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entirerecord, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 22 May 1987 you enlisted in the Navy at age 18. In connection with this processing, you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10625-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 6 September 1984 you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 19. On 9 July 1985 you were counseled...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10626-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enrollment in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB)2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Rothlein, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 June 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10633-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNC memorandum 1400/3 MNPR-2, 19 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10635-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After Careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 13 August 1992 at age 18 and served without incident until 2 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10646-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Public Law 105-85 enacted on 18 November 1997, authorized SBP participants to voluntarily discontinue SBP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10654-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submittzed in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10658-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 25 August 1995 you reenlisted in the Navy at age 25 after a prior period of honorable service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10667-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memo 7220 N13OD1/Ser 07U0146 of 16 Feb 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10671-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 19 February 2002 you enlisted in the Navy at age 22. However, both evaluations recommended your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10677-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the petitioner “USNR”, vice “USN”.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUS IONUpon review and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10678-06
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo dtd 13 Apr 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10679-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he enlisted for a 4 year term, with a concurrent 24 months extension, vice a 6 year term.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Ivins, Mr. Pfeiffer, and Ms. Countryman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 27 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10681-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(FTS), vice USN.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Ballinger, Mr. Mann, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 1 May 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10687-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he is entitled to separation pay, was retired by reason of physical disability, and is not required to repay the unearned portion of his selective reenlistment bonus. On 21 December 2005, Petitioner was advised that he could be subject to administrative separation action unless he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10695-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he terminated his insurable interest coverage and enrolled his spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Leeman, and Mr. Chapman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10703-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 21 July 2000 at age 18. On 11 August 2000, during a psychiatric...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10705-06
10705-06 22 February 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus(SRB).2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Bourgeois, Mr. Boyd, and Mr....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10706-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlisted in higher paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10714-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by cMc memorandum 1400/3 NMPR-2, 19 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10719-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 August 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Of ficeof theChief of Naval Operations dated 5 March 2007 with enclosures, a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10732-06
10732-06 26 Jun 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10742-06
In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUSIONUpon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.Docket No.. 10742-06RECOMMENDAT ION:That Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10755-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to the Loan Repayment Program (LRP)2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dawson, Ms. Countryman, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 August 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10772-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10778-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 24 February 1986 you reenlisted in the Navy at age 26 after two prior periods of honorable service....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10793-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to Board Certified Pay (BCP).2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Leeman, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10795-06
10795-06 28 March 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) 0369.2. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10797-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 6 January 1970 at age 19. After you were notified of this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10798-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following documents are recommended: Original VA Rating Decision discussing why the VA...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10803-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Gilbert, Wilcher, and Mr. Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10812-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. Gilbert, Wilcher, and Mr. Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on13 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10842-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100DJCDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the petitioner elected to participate in the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Ms. Gilbert, and Ms. Wilcher,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10858-06
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Reference (b) is the performance evaluation directive governing submission of the report.2. Concerning the petitioner’s allegation that this report is biased because he requested mast, the Board could find no evidence to support his contention.c.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10859-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1780 Ser 352/80 dtd 30 Jan 07, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10861-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10862-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Mann Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 20 No mber 2006, a copy of which is attached. In this conction, the Board substantially concurred with the comments cont ned in the report of the PERB, except it...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10863-06
The Board was likewise unable to find the reporting senior lacked sufficient basis for his finding that you had engaged in “inappropriate conduct.” On the contrary, your statement in reply to the contested fitness report revealed that the reporting senior had “received a letter from a woman [you] had been dating alleging harassment.” In view of the above, your application has been denied.The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. “Recently counseled for...