Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10742-06
Original file (10742-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
Docket No. 10742-06
8 Feb 07
From:    Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:      Secretary of the Navy
Subj:    REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO

Ref:     (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
 End:     (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
         (2)      NAVSUPSYSCMD ltr 4050 Ser 53G/002, 8 Jan 07
         (3)      Subject’s naval record
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders issued by CONNAVPERSCOM extending Petitioner’s duty in Djibouti were issued in January 2006.
2. The Board, consisting of Mses. Gilbert, Humberd, and Mr. Dietrich, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 February 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
a.       Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
b.       In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.
CONCLUSION
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.









Docket No.. 10742-06

RECOMMENDAT ION:
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that:
a.       COMNAVPERSCOM Millington TN issued the orders extending Petitioner’s tour of duty in Djibouti on “11 January 2006” vice “14 November 2006”.
b.       On 12 January 2006 Petitioner executed the appropriate documents whereby he voluntarily elected to participate in the DITY Program to move his HHG: that by endorsement dated 11 January 2006 authority for him to participate in the DITY Program was granted by the appropriate authorities and the proper documents were prepared to show that government procured equipment for the DITY move was obtained through the appropriate naval authorities and used by the Petitioner vice that he personally obtained and used rental equipment and/or his personal vehicle.
c.       The auditors will calculate the member’s reimbursement per JFTR U5320-D2 for all allowable charges, based on total weight moved, not to exceed the Government constructed cost for the member’s maximum weight allowance.
(NOTE: A copy of all documents pertaining to moving the household goods and a copy of this letter will be mailed to Business Support Department, HHG Audit Team, Code 302, FISC, Norfolk, VA 23511-3392.)
d.       A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in Petitioner’s naval record.
4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN        WILLIAM J. HESS,
Recorder         Acting Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.


8 February 2007


                                                               W. DEAN PFIEFFER
                                                               Executive Director


2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09842-06

    Original file (09842-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his discharge orders were issued prior to 31 March 2006 and entitled to an incentive payment for moving his HHG under the provisions of the Do-It-Yourself (DITY) Program.2. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04941-06

    Original file (04941-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner submitted a request to extend her entitlement to ship household goods (HHG) at government expense beyond the 1-year period and shipment of HHG via the Do-It-Yourself...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 11964-08

    Original file (11964-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his retirement orders were issued prior to 6 April 2007 and he was entitled to an incentive payment for a Do-It-Yourself Move (DITY) for moving his household goods (HHG). The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06605-06

    Original file (06605-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner’s Permanent Change of Station orders were issued prior to 30 December 2004 and Petitioner was authorized to move his household goods (HHG) via the Do-It-Yourself (DITY) Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Haney, Pfeiffer, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner’s...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00011-08

    Original file (00011-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders reassigning Petitioner to VAQ 129, Whidbey Island, WA were issued prior to 10 August 2007 and entitled to an incentive payment for moving his household goods (HHG) under the Do-It-Yourself (DITY) Program.2. The Board, Consisting of Messrs. George, Pfeiffer, and Zsalman, reviewed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06141-00

    Original file (06141-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he is entitled to an incentive allowance for moving his household goods (HHGs) under the “Do-It-Yourself” (DITY) Program. The Board, consisting of Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 October 2000 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04843-00

    Original file (04843-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he is entitled to an incentive allowance for moving his household goods (HHGs) under the “Do-It-Yourself” (DITY) Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 12266-08

    Original file (12266-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Active Duty Special Work (ADSW) orders directing Petitioner to report to Port Hueneme, CA were issued prior to 19 September 2008 and authorize entitlement to an incentive...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02146-99

    Original file (02146-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the orders releasing Petitioner from active duty were issued 22 December 1997 and that he is entitled to an incentive allowance for moving his household goods (HHGs) under the “Do-It-Yourself” (DITY) Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Petitioner’s allegations of error and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04216-98

    Original file (04216-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAW ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 4216-98 1 April 1999 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, allegations of error and injustice on 30 March 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the...