Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10633-06
Original file (10633-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAW ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


 LCC
 Docket No. 10633-06
24 Jan 07

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 U SC 1552.
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 January 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNC memorandum 1400/3 MNPR-2, 19 December 2006, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
 Acting Executive Director
 Enclosure








                                    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                                     HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS
                                    MANPOWER AND RESERVE AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT
 HARRY LEE HALL, 17 LEJEUNE ROAD       
        QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5104
I
         MMPR-2
          DEC 19 2006
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:    ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF

Ref: (a) BCNR Docket Number 10633-06 of 1 Dec 06
          (b) MCO Pl900.16F, MARCORSEPMAN
1 Per reference (a), requests a correction
to his DD Form 214, effective 20 August 2002 through 19 August
2006, to reflect the rank of sergeant (E-5) vice corporal (E-4)
2 A review of record verifies he was promoted to corporal on 1 September 2005. He was released from active duty on 19 August 2006. Per reference (b), the rank on the DD Form 214 will be the rank the Marine holds on the date of separation from active duty. Therefore, the DD Form 214 in question is correct with the rank o f corporal. On 20 August 2006 joined the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) and was subsequently promoted to sergeant effective 1 October 2006.
         
                  3.       Based on the foregoing, DD Form 214 in question is correct and does not require any further action.
•       


US Major, U.S. Marine Corps Head, Enlisted Promotion Section

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11287-06

    Original file (11287-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 29 January 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00688-06

    Original file (00688-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01535-06

    Original file (01535-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Per reference (a) , Sergeant requests a correction to his DD Form 214, effective 25 January 2000 through 24 January 2004, to reflect the rank of sergeant (E-5) vice corporal (F-A) 2. A review record verifies he was promoted to corporal on 1 January 2003.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 11289-06

    Original file (11289-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 MMPR-2, 29 January 2007, a copy of each is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 00110-08

    Original file (00110-08.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by MMPR-2 1400/3 of 14 Mar 08, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06960-06

    Original file (06960-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6960-06 1 Nov 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10364-05

    Original file (10364-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Additionally, the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) has not removed the administrative reduction from XXXX record. You requested we provide an advisory opinion on Corporal Ramirez’s (hereinafter “Applicant”) application to reinstate his previous rank of Sergeant (Applicant was administratively reduced to Corporal) -2. Applicant claims he was reduced to Private First Class (PFC), but there is no documented evidence in Applicant’s record stating this reduction took place.4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 10157-08

    Original file (10157-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 April 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum MMPR-2 1400/3 of 27 February 2009, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01049-06

    Original file (01049-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF In order to be promoted to lance corporal, a Marine must have at least eight months time in grade.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08002-06

    Original file (08002-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum 1400/3 1~4MPR-2, 11 October 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a) XXXX requestback pay from 1 April 2003 through 6 September 2003 due to a promotion to sergeants.2. Based on the...