Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10732-06
Original file (10732-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
                           MEH
                                                                                          Docket No. 10732-06
                                                                                          26 Jun 07


This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 U SC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 June 2007. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered a recommendation made by the Navy Personnel command that your reasons for waiving the debt were not compelling in light of your record.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board found that you voluntarily resigned with the knowledge that your time already spent in service was not sufficient in length to fully repay your obligation for advanced education at the Naval Academy. The Board noted that your performance and conduct while on active duty did not measure up to the high standards expected of the officer corps as evidenced by your fitness reports and your non-judicial punishment. The Board found that your service to the National Guard, the Boy Scouts and your church are commendable, but that such service does not change the fact that your active service in the Navy did not fully repay your obligation for advanced education. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.






Docket No. 10732-06



consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFE IFFER
Executive Director
2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02031-01

    Original file (02031-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    effect, disenrolled yourself from the program by refusing to enroll in required Naval Science classes, and then attempted to procure a favorable separation for medical reasons. discharge for medical reasons. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04440-99

    Original file (04440-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In your application you are requesting that you not be required to repay the cost of your education at the USNA. further administrative consideration of your case by submitting your resignation, and you admitted guilt in your resignation letter. There is no evidence in the record, and you have However, you precluded any It is Concerning the decision to waive recoupment of educational costs for Mr. 0 in 1996 despite his use of LSD, the Board determined that this waiver action resulted from...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 04468-06

    Original file (04468-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    04468-06 2 November 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01004-06

    Original file (01004-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Delayed Entry Program of the Naval Reserve on 22 July 1997 and incurred an...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4153 13

    Original file (NR4153 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In essence, the Board felt you received payments for an obligation you did not fulfill and the Navy's action to make you repay the payments did not equate to material error or injustice. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07244-01

    Original file (07244-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 January 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS MARINE CORPS RECRUITING COMMAND 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00214-02

    Original file (00214-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board found that these factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your service on release from active duty, given your disciplinary record and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 07773-10

    Original file (07773-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On or about 13 March 2006, you appeared before a Performance Review Board {PRB} convened to inquire into your aptitude and performance. In the Board's view, your request to disenroll was a voluntary decision made of your own free will. Docket No._7773-10 were aware that you could continue in the NROTC program as well.?

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07450-06

    Original file (07450-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 June 1999 at age 18. You were honorably released from active duty, and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07857-09

    Original file (07857-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2010. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...