NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00010-06
10-06 28 FEB 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OFNAVAL RECORD ICO—Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for NEC 5326.2. The reenlistment executed on or about 13 October 2000 is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00018-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This responds to your request (enclosure (1)) for comments and recommendation on subject Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) petition. Applicant indicates in enclosure (I) that decedent and she married 17 October 1955, decedent retired from Navy on 11 January 1974,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00033-06
A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00040-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100MEHDocket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “C” Location Selective Reenlistment Bonus (LSRB) for UIC 0763A.2 The Board consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00043-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 13 October 1969 at age 18. Subsequently, you were issued a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00067-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 22 May 1991 at age 18 and served for one year and six months without...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00082-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) 1450/2 (M1~4PR-2) letter dated 6 April 2005, Subject: Delay of Promotion in Case of Petitioner (copy at Tab A).2. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the CMC 1450/2 Mr4PR-2 letter dated 6 April 2005, Subject: Delay of Promotion in Case...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00083-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2007. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00096-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 28 February 1969. Although a phobia may render a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00099-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 14 July 1986 at. However, the Board assumed that the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00100-06
l00—06 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00112-06
112-06 8 Mar 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00142-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Marine Corps on 27 July 1967 at age 17. After returning to the United States,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00151-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincere1yW. Staff Sergeant XXXX applied for reenlistment into the Marine Corps Reserve on 8 January 2003 in the pay grade of E-6 b. Per paragraph 5104.2 of reference (c) if enlisting within 12 months after separation from the Marine Corps or Marine Corps Reserve, applicants will be reappointed to the grade held at the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00229-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NP~ memo of 3 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00244-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence Of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 29 August 2005 at age 18. On 28 November 2005, the separation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00274-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 15 March 1974 you enlisted in the Naval Reserve at age 20 and remained on inactive duty until...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00282-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulation 5 and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 26 October 2003 with about 16 years of active service from prior...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00307-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entwire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 18 March 2002. After review by the discharge...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00326-06
2 The Board consisting of Mr Mr Msreviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. This code will alert recruiters that there is a problem that must be resolved before enlistment should be authorized.The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner’s naval record so that all future...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00337-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed an application with this Board requesting a better characterization of service then the undesirable discharge issued on 30 July 1974.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Mr.and reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice 2 August 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00343-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00344-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 September 1975 at age 18. It is clear from the record that several...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00347-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she received a more favorable reentry code than RE-4.2. The Board, consistingofMessr5.~U~,~~an - reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 11 January 2007, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00383-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (b), an individual who was a Veterans Educational Assistance Program (VEAP) participant on or before 9 October 1996 and served continuously from that date through at least 1 April 2000 was allowed an opportunity to convert from VEAP to the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB) Program. We had other cases of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00387-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 19 February 1976. Although the request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00389-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing his failure of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2007 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so as to be considered by the selection board that next convenes to consider officers of his category for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel as an officer who has not failed to that grade.2. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00395-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by removing the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Routing Sheet (5211) dated 25 February 2003 with attachments, a copy of which is at Tab A. The Board, consisting of Messrs. leer and Mes and Ms. me reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 March 2007, and pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00410-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the BU rating. The 6 year reenlistment executed on or about 12 December 2002 is null and void. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00419-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 February 1985 at age 17. The Board also considered the statement...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00428-06
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner is entitled to reimbursement of travel for his dependent wife from Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bourgeois, Boyd, and J. Hicks, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00440-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 16 June 2005. Upon discharge from the VA...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00453-06
453-06 28 FEB 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICORef: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show she did not enroll her spouse in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP).2. The Board, consisting of ~ reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00471-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00472-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject’s case. Member is not entitled to active duty credit for her time spent at the USNA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00480-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that you served on active duty in the Navy from 13 August 1986 to 14 October 1987, when you were discharged by reason of physical disability due to a conversion disorder that was rated 10% disabling. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00494-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 26 June 1998 at age 18. In the evaluation for the period ending 11...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00510-06
510-06 10 May 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00515-06
After carefu and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board fo nd that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish th existence of probable material error or injustice. MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Per reference (b), the decision to disenroll is irrevocable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00557-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 March 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof; your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00568-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No 568-06 9 Feb 06 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00588-06
Applicant’s adverse fitness was entered into his official record while his record was before the calendar year Se1ectjon Board. On 28 May 2004, almost 4 years after his first non— selection, Applicant submitted a package to the Board for Correction Of Naval Records. Moreover, reference (b) requires due diligence to seek corrective action and remedial promotion.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00605-06
By correspondence dated 14 November 2003 (copy at Tab B), Petitioner was advised that his selection by the CY 2003 Gunnery Sergeant Selection Board had been revoked for unspecified “unprofessional conduct and poor judgment” exhibiting failure to maintain the high standards expected of a Marine Corps staff noncommissioned officer.e. Enclosure (7) documents that a member of the Board’s staff contacted the HQMC Enlisted Promotion Section and was informed that had Petitioner’s selection by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00607-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYBOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 Docket No: 607-061 March 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00610-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 January 2007. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Applicant fails to provide substantial evidence of probable material error or injustice in support of his application.3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00617-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICA QN IN THE CASE OF c. The petitioner does not provide any evidence that a failure to counsel him played any part in the incident that resulted in the adverse nature of the report. A review of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00625-06
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 19 January 2006, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00630-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00633-06
Petitioner contends the contested report, submitted on her detachment, violated the prohibitions in Chief of Naval Operations Instruction 6000.1B against adverse performance evaluations by reason of pregnancy or performance evaluation comments on pregnancy.d. e. Per enclosure (2), the uncorrected report in question was accepted as originally submitted to the member’s record, attached with an NAVPERS 1616/23 (Memo) over 9 months after the report had been issued to the member. The comments...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00644-06
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. For veterans and members like who entered during VEAP era and were not eligible for MGIB Program enrollment, we would not expect to find a CI Bill program document in their service record. If the member didn’t elect to enroll in VEAP initially, they had a second opportunity during the VEAP open enrollment...