Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00568-06
Original file (00568-06.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                                    LCC
                                                                    Docket
                                                 No 568-06
                                                                    9 Feb
                                                 06

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:   Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO


Ref:  (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:           (1)      DD Form 149 w/attachments
         2) Telecon w/Representative,
         3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting,
in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner
was advanced when first eligible.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of
error and injustice on 7 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on
the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the
Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

    a.     Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within
the Department of the Navy.

    b.     In a telephone conversation with a representative from the Exam
Center, the representative commented that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUS ION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially
in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of
an injustice warranting the following corrective action.










                                                    Docket No. 568-06
RECOMMENDAT ION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show
that:

      a.    Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 August 2004
and further corrected to show advanced to paygrade E-5 effective 16
December 2005.

      b.    A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.

4.    Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for
Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(c)) it is certified that quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.




Recorder

5.    Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of
the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32
Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.




      9 February 2006  W. DEAN PFIEFFER
            Executive








                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01384-06

    Original file (01384-06.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. The Board, consisting of Messrs. reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 February 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03674-06

    Original file (03674-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2037C>5100SRB Docket No: 3674-06 25 Oct 06From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: Ref. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, hat the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Upon review and consideration of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03259-06

    Original file (03259-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, hat the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 October 2006 and, pursuant t its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06557-06

    Original file (06557-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. reviewed Petitioner’~ llegations of erro and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, Pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Pursuant to the delegation of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06536-06

    Original file (06536-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03280-06

    Original file (03280-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2.The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt, Geisler, and Leeman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice On 24 October 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06328-06

    Original file (06328-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Koman, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 6 September 2006 and, pursuant to its regulations. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08653-05

    Original file (08653-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade.2. Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 08683-05

    Original file (08683-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in an advanced paygrade. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and warrants favorable action.CONCLUS IONUpon review and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07179-06

    Original file (07179-06.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Beckett, Dunn, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17...