Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00100-06
Original file (00100-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-51 00


 MEH
 Docket No. l00—06
28 February 2006





This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. As noted in paragraph 2b of the advisory opinion you may terminate your SBP coverage, with your spouse’s concurrence, during the 24th through 36th month after receiving retired pay. A form has been enclosed should you wish to take advantage of this option. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is also important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
                                                              
                                                               W. DEAN PFEIFFER
          Executive Director       

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00229-06

    Original file (00229-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NP~ memo of 3 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09419-05

    Original file (09419-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NP~ memo of 2 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10436-05

    Original file (10436-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    10436-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 10390-05

    Original file (10390-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 1160 Ser 4811/111 of 15 Feb 06, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, a majority of the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09310-05

    Original file (09310-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9310-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 Usc1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse’s naval record and applicable statutes,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 09709-05

    Original file (09709-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9709-05 28 February 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your deceased former spouse’s naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your former spouse’s naval record and applicable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01382-06

    Original file (01382-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    01382-0628 February 2006-This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested that your minimum service obligation be reduced from eight to seven years, or that you be released from active duty effective February 2006. As indicated in the enclosed letter dated 2 February 2006, your case was administratively closed, pending exhaustion of the administrative remedy of submitting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06849-06

    Original file (06849-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    6849-06 25 Oct 06This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 usc 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. ...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01135-06

    Original file (01135-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100BJG Docket No: 1135-06 19 December 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested, in effect, that your naval record be corrected to show that you were not removed from the Fiscal Year 2003 or 2004 Lieutenant All Fully Qualified Officers Promotion List and that you were...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09941-06

    Original file (09941-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9941-067 February 2007This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...