NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 007176-0
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00721-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00726-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when tirst eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Paitling, and Ms. McCor~nick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and itilustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, deterniined that the corrective action indicated below slio~~ltl be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00728-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AE rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Cooper, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and illjustice on 30 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, deterniined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00731-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00734-01
OPSUBPAY is payable to active duty naval service officers and enlisted personnel when assigned to and serving in a submarine when CONSUBPAY eligibility criteria, paragraph 4, ‘are not met (see enclosure (2)). a. OPSUBPAY when attached for duty (ACC 100) to a submarine command staff: OPSUBPAY is payable on a month-to-month basis to individuals qualified in submarines while attached for duty (ACC 100) to submarine command staffs (enclosure (8)) provide&that . To satisfy ride time...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00742-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 742-02 10 April 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey , Paul i ng, and Ms. McCor~nick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and illjustice on 9 April 2002 and, ~~i~rsuant determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00743-02
1552 Encl : (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) (3) NPC memorandum 1 160 Ser 8 1 Sul3_ject’s naval record l/O27 of 4 April 2002 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be I. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for NEC 3384. He was discharged and reenlisted on 2/3 June 2001 (E4 over two years). Pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00744-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOh4 copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00750-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy, and Silberman, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 March 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00760-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 April 2002. You completed an application for enlistment on that date in which you falsely denied having been previously discharged from the Armed Forces by reason of physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00762-02
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the rationale of the hearing panel of the Physical Evaluation Board which considered your case on 14 March 2002, a copy of which is attached. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. It is important to note, contdined in Exhibit for the period March 1999 to March 2000. that this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00768-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00773-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully considered all mitigating factors, such as your youth and your contention that and immaturity, post service conduct, you sought other avenues so that you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00775-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your conduct average was 3.6. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00780-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by changing his date of rank from 1 January 1998 to January 1996. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Taylor and Zsalman and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 29 March 2001, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00784-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00785-02
ti1nely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse Sub_ject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken available evidence of record. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00787-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief, Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 8 April 2002, a copy of which is attached, and your letters dated 26 February and 17 May 2002, each with enclosure. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00788-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures ,applicable to the proceedings of this Board. dereliction in the performance of your duties and were awarded a $300 forfeiture of pay and reduction t paygrade E-l. Again, you were warned that further misconduct could result in an other than honorable discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00795-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on:22 August 2002. In the absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge by reason of misconduct was erroneous or unjust, and establishes that you were unfit to perform your duties by reason of physical disability, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00799-02
A medical board was prepared in January 1998 and PEB's Record Review Panel In June, 1998, the forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) for consideration. Lumbar Decompression and Low Back Pain Status Post Fusion (72420) The Record Review Panel found the member unfit for duty under VA Code 5295, rated his condition at 10% disability and separation pay. However, Therefore, after careful consideration of all relevant medical evidence, viewed in a .light most favorable to the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00804-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Aviator Career Continuation Pay (ACCP) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Brezna, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 5 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00805-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to entitlement to Aviator Career Continuation Pay (ACCP) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Brezna, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 5 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00806-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to Aviator Career Continuation Pay (ACCP) when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Brezna, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 5 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00808-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. discharged for misconduct a correction of the record to show transfer to the Retired Reserve was not warranted. It is clear from the record that you used cocaine, The Board was aware that although you have The Board found...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00816-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:dd_j Docket No: 30 April 2002 y/6 M-02 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC memorandum Subject’s naval record 1 160 Pers 8 1 1 /013 of 2 April 2002 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00817-02
In atldition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or In this connection, the Board substantially conct~rrec-1 with the co~ii~nents contained in injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable niaterial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00836-02
Not withstanding the requirement to report the petitioner's unfortunate failing, of his overall performance and with a most positive "word picture" in Section I. nothing in this process was a quick the report appears to be a fair evaluation Contrary to the Both officers and failing to properly execute that bf enclosure (6) to reference (a), In paragraph seven I MEF clearly holds the petitioner responsible toward C . The petitioner is correct that paragraph 5005 of reference (a) requires the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00838-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed written application, enclosure (1), with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness report for 1 October 1999 to 30 September 2000. He alleges that when he discussed the report with the reporting senior, the reporting senior “gave no justification for the downgrade,” but indicated only that the promotion recommendation “‘.. .was the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00839-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 839-02 25 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed the requested correction of Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00841-02
Specifically, Petitioner told the investigating officer, “I am uncertain to which people were in my car, but I think it was LCpl, Cpl and a girl named To my knowledge, no one in my car exposed themselves to anyone at anytime.” c. On 2 March 2001, charges were preferred against Petitioner alleging dereliction of duty1, false official statement, disorderly conduct, and an indecent act, in violation of Articles 92(3), 107, and 134 of the. Subj: BOARD FOR CORRECTION O~ NAVAL RECORDS (BCNR)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00842-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memorandum 1 160 Pers 8 1 (3) Subject ’s naval record l/O13 of 2 April 2002 From To: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for NEC 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to establish entitlement to a zone 5323. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00848-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 June 2002. On 10 October 1991 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of defective enlistment and induction due to erroneous enlistment, as evidenced by the diagnosis of enuresis. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00852-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:yrj Docket No: 852-02 18 June 2002 This is i n reference to your application for correction of your naval record pilrsuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. Documentary material cunsitleretl by the Board consisted of your application, together with all nlaterial si~b~nitted applicable statutes,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00860-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 April 200 1. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board: Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00863-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with, this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for designated location of dependents. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00864-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 March 2002. You enlisted in the Navy on 7 May 1991. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-01
870-01 24 January 2002 Dear Mr.- This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 16 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00870-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum 1 133 Ser of which is attached. Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00873-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was retained on active duty until he qualified for retirement, vice being released from active duty on 24 August 1999. Petitioner, a LTCOL (O-5) in the Marine Corps Reserve, was issued Active Duty for Special Work (ADSW) orders...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00874-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Cooper, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00877-02
’s naval record A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your spouse and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Chief Petty enrolled Ms. (SBP) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00880-00
Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director -- Enclosure i RATIONALE ON 13 SEPTEMBER 1996, A MEDICAL BOARD WAS CONVENED AT THE NAVAL HOSPITAL, CAMP LEJEUNE, NORTH CAROLINA IN THE CASE OF THIS 28 YEAR OLD MEMBER WITH THE FOLLOWING DIAGNOSES: (1) CHRONIC INSTABILITY LEFT SHOULDER, 71881 (2) CHRONIC MECHANICAL LOW BACK PAIN, 7242 (3) CHRONIC DEGENERATIVE ARTHRITIS LEFT KNEE, 71598 (4) SUBLUXATION SPONTANEOUS MANDIBLE, 8300 -- THE RECORD REVIEW PANEL OF THE PHYSICAL ON 15 JANUARY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00888-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Sul>ject hereinat'ter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure ( I ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that tlie applicable naval record be corrected to show promotion to a higher paygrade. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Milner, and Cooper, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, deterniined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00896-01
CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial The Board believes that it would be appropriate to relief. Board also believes that a correction to Petitioner's DD Form 214, or any other parts of the service record, would be inappropriate since those records correctly show that a man named Steven M. Pierce served in the Navy from 16 February 1978 to 15 October 1985 and in the Naval Reserve from 16...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00899-02
The Board also considered your letter dated 4 October 2002 with enclosures. The member requests the removal of his fitness report for the 2. The fitness report itself represents the opinion of the reporting senior.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00909-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. day period of UA that was not terminated until you were apprehended on 29 September 1976. submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for the two periods of UA totalling...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00914-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00914-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 9 14-02 22 August 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show promoted when first eligible. ...