DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
JRE
Docket No:
6 September 2002
795-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application
on:22 August 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your
naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
Boars
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
Board found that the
You were
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Naval Reserve on 7 June 1985.
discharged by reason of misconduct on 21 September 1990, while in an unauthorized absence
status, with a discharge under other than honorable conditions. That characterization was
based on your extensive disciplinary record, which included repeated absences without
authority, missing the movement of vessels on numerous occasions, and dereliction of duty.
In addition, the Board noted that your service during that enlistment, apart from your
disciplinary problems, was substandard.
and psychological complaints during your enlistment, none of them rendered you unfit for
duty, or significantly extenuated or mitigated your repeated acts of misconduct. In the
absence of evidence which demonstrates that your discharge by reason of misconduct was
erroneous or unjust, and establishes that you were unfit to perform your duties by reason of
physical disability, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
panel will be furnished upon&quest.
Although you suffered from a number of physical
The names and votes of the members of the
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be
taken. You are entitled to have the
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
In this regard, it is
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00595-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative' regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your record reflects that on 25 October 1956 you were convicted by summary court-martial (SCM) of a two day period of unauthorized absence You were sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 15 days and a $30 forfeiture...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09002-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07141-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. There is another period of unauthorized absence of about one day After the ADB and prior to discharge, you received Your offenses were possession of a false The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07898-09
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6929 13
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After waiving your procedural rights, your commanding officer recommended discharge under honorable conditions by reason of unfitness due to frequent involvement of a discreditable nature with military authorities. The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03142-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this material considered by the Board consisted of Board. paygrade E-l, restriction and extra The On 16 August 1999 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00101-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 01587-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 8 September 2004. You were examined on 18 July...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05484 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, Sailors with a record of misconduct such as yours who are discharged by reason of unfitness normally receive undesirable discharges, and as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04717-00
You requested that your record be corrected to show that you were separated from the Marine Corps Discharge under Honorable Conditions ”. with a “Medical A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 January 2002. After consulting with counsel, you waived your right to consideration of your case by an administrative discharge board.