NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07198-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07203-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Upon review, the dishonorable discharge was mitigated to a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07208-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting in effect, that the DD Form 214 and associated service pages be corrected to show her current name and sex. served in the Naval Reserve from 21 August to 10 December 1967, in the Navy from 11 December 1967 to 10 December 1973, and in the Naval Reserve from 3 January 1974 to 2 January 1978. That a Statement of Service be prepared for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07273-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "C" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MA rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07364-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07365-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to convert from the VEAP to the MGIB Program during the open conversion period in 1996. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Rothlein, Zsalman, and Ms. Hardbower, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07442-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 7442-00 27 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07468-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE N A V Y B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH : ddj Docket No: 7468-00 13 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (I) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07469-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 29 November 2000 and 2 January 2001, copies of which are attached. 2 Subj: ~ GUNNERY SERGEANT U~IIIIhIUBCR f. Gunnery Sergean rovides a statement in support of his request for removal of’ ‘the page 11 entry. g. Gunnery Sergean rovides documentation, a copy of a personal award, the Navy and Marine Corps Achievement Medal he received to support his request for removal of the page 11 entry.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07510-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 75 10-00 15 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show enlistment in paygrade...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07532-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone " A " Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the PC rating. TheBoard, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07547-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Rothlein, Zsalman, and Ms. Hardbower, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07603-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7603-00 13 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07679-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a reason for discharge other than fraudulent enlistment. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment instead of fraudulent enlistment. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07681-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "C" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the OS rating (NEC 0304). Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07733-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. A review of his service and medical records, and the records at this Headquarters fails to reveal any documentation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07751-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone "B" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the CTR rating (NEC 9147). Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07754-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion" furnished by the Awards and Special Projects Branch in the Office of the Chief of Na-1 February 2002, a copy of which is attached Operations (OP09B13), dated 19 After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 I N R E P L Y R E F E R TO Ser 09B 131A2U5 1548 1 19 February...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07806-00
On 12 February 1976 you submitted a written request for an u desirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court—martial f r an unauthorized absence of 410 days. Further, the Board concluded that you recei ed the benefit of your bargain when yur request for discharge wa granted and should not be permitted to change it now. Consequently, when applyng for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable ma erial error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07909-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone "A" Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ABF rating. Shy, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 27 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07985-00
I~o~veves, cvcnt that the Secretnry considers a product to represent the most appr-opriate countermeasure for diseases endemic to the area of operations or to protect against possible chemical, biological, or- radiological weapons, but the product has not yet been approved by the FDA for its intended use, the product may, under certain circumstances and strict controls, be administered to provide potential protection for the health and well-being of deployed military personnel in order to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08063-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE—4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a diagnosed personality disorder, and such a code is normally assigned when an individual is considered at risk to harm himself or others. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08102-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 26 May 1989. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that she was not discharged on 20 May 1989 but continued to serve on active duty until 22 September 1989 when she was released from active duty with her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08166-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2001. The record does not reflect the disciplinary action taken, if any, for this period of UA. However, the Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant a change in the characterization of your service because of your frequent misconduct, which resulted in six disciplinary actions, and since your conduct average...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08182-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone ‘A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the MR rating. Entitlements should be deducted from the zone “A” member originally received from the 13 December 1985 reenlistment. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08217-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 8217-00 27 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he elected not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08242-00
1552 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Encl: (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's Naval Record 1. The DJMS Procedures Training Guide states that an individual separated by reason of secretarial authority, with separation code JFF, is entitled to full separation pay. However, neither DODINST 1332.29 nor SECNAVINST 1900.7G states that individuals separated by reason of secretarial authority are ineligible for separation pay.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08262-00
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2001. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three NJPs and special court—martial conviction, and the fact that you accepted discharge rather than face trial by court-martial for two prolonged periods of UA totalling nearly a year. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08266-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08348-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08397-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2001. During the period from 16 March to 1 September 1965 you received NJP on four more occasions for two periods of unauthorized absence (UA) totalling 11 days, disobedience, wrongful possession of an altered identification card, two periods of absence from your appointed place of duty, and sleeping on watch. Subsequently, the discharge authority directed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08472-00
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08558-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Your performance evaluation for the period from 1 December 1987 to 13 April 1988 reflects a nonrecommendation for continued service or reenlistment because you were not a positive contributor to the Navy. However, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reenlistment code given your substandard performance and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08680-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 08710-00
The fitness report in question is a Periodic/Regular report. The fitness report itself represents the opinions of the reporting senior. Chief as petitioned for advancement to Senior Chief Petty Officer due to a Fitness Report he believes to be unjust.