NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 00892-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 9 October 1950 you appeared before a board of officers in BUPERS which recommended that your commission be revoked and that your service be characterized as being under conditions other than honorable. However, the Board found that these factors and contentions were not sufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 01156-00
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 8 February 2001, a copy of which is attached. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. The petitioner offers matters in extenuation and mitigation of his failures of the physical fitness test (PET).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 01854-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting in effect, that the DD Form 214 and associated service pages be corrected to show her current name and sex. However, the Board also believes that a correction to Petitioner's DD Form 214, or any other parts of the service record, would be inappropriate since those records correctly show that a man named Chalmer R. Messer served in the Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 02329-00
The discharge authority approved the ADB recommendation and directed discharge under other than honorable conditions. -- -- h. On 8 March 1990, Petitioner appeared with counsel before the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) . The NDRB found Petitioner to be credible and candid in his testimony and believed the circumstances described by Petitioner had occurred.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 02387-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 14 August 1975 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court—martial for an unauthorized absence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03056-00
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps dated 3 1 January and 9 July 2001, copies of which are attached. Specifically, we are asked to address the following: (1) the alleged difference between the Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps (ACMC) Memorandum to the Secretary of the Navy (SecNav) and the Navy Inspector General's (Navy IG) report as to the facts of Petitioner's misconduct; (2) the allegation that the regulations relied on by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03431-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicdnt to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03499-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. ( 1 ) OASTF~ESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE, 53081 (2) HYPERTENSION, 4019 (3) HYPERCHOLESTEROLEMIA, 2720 (4) CHRONIC HEADACHES, 7840 (5) IRRITABLE BOWEL.SYNDROME, 5641 (6) GENERALIZED ANXIETY DISORDER, 30002 (7) HISTORY OF ALCOHOL ABUSE, 3039 ON 29 JANUARY 1996, THE RECORD REVIEW PANEL OF THE PHYSICAL EVALUATION BOARD...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03548-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03714-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Pursuant to reference (a) a review of enclosure (1) was conducted to form opinions about the subject petitioner's claims that he suffered fiom Post Traumatic Stress Disorder at the time of his service and that this was a significant contributing factor to the misconduct that lead to his discharge. The misconduct that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 03853-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 04281-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The following comments are provided: As shown in enclosure (1), Corpora1~ was off contract from the Marine Corps...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 04455-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 04516-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 04670-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 30 June 2000, a copy of which is attached. To support her appeal, the petitioner furnishes copies of her Request Mast Application of 26 November 1997, her...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 04812-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 April 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05006-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In reviewing all the information in this case, the following are the results~ (1) Mr. is not eligible for the Purple...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05016-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05070-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 May 2001. The VA rated that condition at 30% by analogy to an un-repaired fistula, even though the fistual had been repaired. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05317-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to that he elected to sell a total of 60 days of Lump Sum Leave (LSL) in conjunction with his reenlistment of 26 May 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Dunn, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2001 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05329-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 April 2001. In this rcgard, the Board noted that in order for a service member to qualify for disability retirement, he must be found unfit to perform the duties of his office, grade, rank or rating by reason of physical disability ratable at or above 30% disabling. The VA assigns disability ratings without regard to the issue of fitness for military duty.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05577-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. c. In reviewing petitions that question the exercise of the reporting senior's evaluation responsibilities, we must determine if the reporting senior abused hidher discretionary authority. e. The fact that the performance evaluations for the two previous periods from the same reporting...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05630-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 30 October 2000, a copy of which is attached. The members requests the removal or change her performance evaluation to NOB for the period 2 April 1999 to 15 July 1999.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05664-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. We can not administratively make the changes the member request on a fitness report.. Only the reporting senior who signed the original report...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05689-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05769-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 26 April 1994 you were notified of proposed administrative separation action by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure due to your refusal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 05864-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy T JR Docket No: 5864-00 12 March 2001 Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of his discharge be changed. The Board's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06134-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. * You were advanced to RM3 (E-4), extended your enlistment for an additional period of four months, and served without further incident until 15 March 1982, when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for use of marijuana. Counsel also noted that the senior member of the ADB was not an 0-4 line officer.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06216-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2001. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterizatiofl of your discharge, given the seriousness of the civil conviction and the unauthorized absences totalling more than eleven months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06231-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 March 2001. However, the facts and circumstances surrounding the special court-martial conviction are not filefin the service record. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06297-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 February 2001. The Board concluded that the foregoing factors and contention were insufficient to warrant recharacteri- zation of your discharge given your record of three NJPs and special court-martial conviction, and your failure to achieve the required averages in military behavior and overall traits. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06312-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve applied to this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the separation under honorable conditions and that her reenlistment code be changed. The majority notes that there are no performance evaluations in the record after 31 January 1995. In addition, the Board notes that she was not discharged on 9 January 1997 as is usually...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06321-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06487-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 MEH:ddj Docket No: 6487-00 8 May 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy End: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) BUPERS memorandum of 12 April 2001 (3) Subject’s naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject’s spouse, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06519-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Your military record shows that you submitted a written request for a discharge under other than honorable conditions in order to avoid trial by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06556-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Based on this evaluation, you were processed for an administrative separation.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06600-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 31 August. In this regard, the majority notes that his conduct mark average was sufficient for an honorable discharge, despite his four disciplinary actions. MINORITY CONCLUSION: Mr. Beckett disagrees with the majority and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06666-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, on 18 March 1959, you waived your right to request restoration to duty and requested that the bad conduct discharge be executed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06694-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed. Analysis a. Petitioner argues that it was unjust to hold his NJP at the battalion level and that the punishment he received was disproportionate to the offense committed.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06703-00
A three—member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 May 2001. The record reflects that you were advanced to SA (E-2) and received the Korean Service Medal for service on board USS JUNEAU (CLkA-119) from 5 September to 17 October 1952. On 18 June 1954 the commanding officer recommended discharge by reason of unfitness and stated that on 7 June 1954 an administrative discharge board (ADB) had thoroughly reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06817-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 8 January 1993. The Board, consisting of Mr. Zsalman, Mr. Dunn and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 24 April 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06868-00
In the case of disability, the DD 214 will show active duty for only the period for which the member was ordered to active duty for training. The DD 214 will be issued to: (1) Personnel Released from Active Duty. The form will be prepared for personnel being separated from a period of active du* for training, full-time training duty, or active duty for special wo&k when the period of service was 90 days or more.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06894-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6894-00 13 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06951-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code be changed. The petty officer filled out some paperwork for him to see a psychiatrist and told him to tell the psychiatrist that he was depressed and suicidal, and had attempted suicide at an early age. MAJORITY RECOMMENDATION: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06967-00
PERS-832C states that he “was, in fact, convicted of DUI under a Deferred Prosecution agreement and his command had every right to document that event in his service record.” They further state “The fact that he met the required obligations, applied for and received a court dismissal of the charge two years later does not negate the incident.” They conclude that documentation supporting that significant event should remain in the record; and that maintaining such documents is essential to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 06969-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07064-00
A three—member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 May 2001. consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2. Review of available Navy medical records revealed: a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07146-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 7146-00 27 February 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07150-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Subsequently, the award recommendation was referred to the Navy Department Board of Decorations and Medals for final review.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07188-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...