D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 N A W ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TRG
Docket No: 6170-98
20 August 1999
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 August 1999. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 2 June 1987
for two years. Subsequently, you extended that enlistment for
nine months for assignment to an "Avv school. At the time of your
reenlistment you had completed almost four years of active
service on a previous enlistment. The record shows that on 23
September 1988 your rating was changed to CT03.
On 23 September 1988 you signed an Administrative Remarks (page
13) entry in which you agreed to extend your enlistment in the
future in order to complete a three year tour at your next duty
station. The page 13 was required because you could not extend
or reenlist on 23 September 1988 because of a possible adverse
impact on the amount of a reenlistment bonus you could receive,
in the future. You acknowledged that if you did not reenlist or
extend as required, you would not be recommended for reenlistment
and assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
You reported to your next duty station on 19 November 1988.
Subsequently you declined to reenlist or extend your enlistment.
You were honorably discharged on 1 March 1990 at the expiration
of your enlistment as extended and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code. At that time you acknowledged that you were
not recommended for reenlistment because of your failure to
obligate for additional service.
In your application you state that you thought the page 13 entry
meant that you would negotiate extending your enlistment. You
also state that you elected to be discharged because you thought
you were going to be married.
In reaching its decision the Board noted that the page 13 entry
clearly states that your enlistment or extension was required.
The Board concluded that your failure to comply with the
agreement was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4
reenlistment code.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
Any adverse reenlistment code may be waived and reenlistment
authorized in the appropriate circumstances. However, whether a
waiver is granted is a matter solely within the discretion of
recruiting authorities.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08288-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 February 1985 you received your third N J P for a day of UA and two incidents of wrongful use of marijuana.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02643-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Any adverse reenlistment code may be waived and reenlistment or reserve affiliation authorized in the appropriate circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00580-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Navy on 23 February 1988 for three years. The Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code since you were treated no differently than others discharged under similar circumstances.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9807519
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 7519-98 14 July 1999 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 01912-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Cor ection of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, co sidered your application on 11 August 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all materqal submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 04067-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 May 1999. An RE-30 reenlistment code may be assigned to career Marines who receive PCS orders but refuse to extend or reenlist in order to obtain sufficient obligated service to carry out those orders. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | NC9808288
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Also during this period, your commanding officer noted, in part, as follows: .... (Member) exhibited no potential for future military service.......
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03300-01
recommended for advancement, an RE-4 reenlistment code was the only code that could be assigned. differently than others released from active duty under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 09391-97
The record also shows that during the period from 1 April 1986 to 30 November 1987 you received two consecutive adverse performance In the second evaluation for the period 1 April to evaluations. You were honorably discharged on 1 May 1990 However, you were assigned duties outside At that time you In reaching its decision the Board noted your disciplinary record, adverse performance evaluations and the fact that you elected separation prior to removal from quality control. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08314-98
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show continuous active service from 12 November 1982 until 24 June 1985. However, since the The Board believes the best way to implement this action is to correct the record to show that Petitioner...