ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022145
Applicant Name: ????? After he spoke with them, they didnt believe him because two NCOs had influenced them that he was a bad Soldier based on the counseling statements. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 May 2009, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for disobeying a lawful order (081103), was derelict in his duties...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022155
Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 16 November 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial/AR-635-200/ Chapter 10/KFS/RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: A Co, 1-12th Infantry Regt, Fort Carson, CO f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 30 December 2008, 6 years, 14 weeks g. Current Enlistment Service: 2 years, 6 months, 13 days h. Total Service: 4 years, 6 months, 29 days i. On 31 October 2011, the separation authority approved the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022183
The evidence of record shows that on 4 September 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022230
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 31 March 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022246
Applicant Name: ????? He wasn't as mentally messed up as he told some of the doctors but his chain of command was trying their hardest to get me kicked out dishonorably. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants available military records, the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicants discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022304
Applicant Name: ????? On 13 April 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting an honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022314
IN THE CASE OF: Mr. BOARD DATE: 7 June 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120022314 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and notwithstanding the Discussion and Recommendation that follows, the Board determined that the applicant's length and quality of his service including his combat service were not significantly...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022324
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 1 November 2001 after serving 2 years, 11 months, and 8 days in the United States Army Reserves. On 12 May 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022342
Discharge Received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 7 March 2001 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: Misconduct, AR 635-200, Chapter 14-12c(2), JKK RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: Headquarters and Headquarters Service Battery 2d Battalion, 20th Field Artillery, 4th Infantry Division (Mechanized), Fort Hood, Texas f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 8 May 2001, 4 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 10 months, 0 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 10 months, 0 days i. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022362
Applicant Name: ????? Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, dated 26 November 2012; DD Form 214 for current service under review.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022376
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The record shows the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 2 March 2010, for a period of 3 years and 16 weeks. On 26 April 2012, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. However, the Army Discharge Review Board considered the applicant for a possible upgrade as instructed by Department of Defense Instruction 1332.28 which...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022380
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army 26 January 2005, for a period of 3 years, 26 weeks. On 5 June 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022381
The record shows that on 20 February 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct - commission of serious offense, in that she received a field grade Article 15 for wrongfully using marijuana (061127), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 22 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022382
The applicant requests his under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Discharge Received: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 6 August 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial, AR 635-200 Chapter 10, KFS, RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: E Troop, 2d Sqdn, 11th ACR, Fort Irwin, CA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 9 February 2010, 5 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 11 months,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022400
Time Lost: 26 days. On 17 December 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant's record shows he was absent without leave (AWOL) during the following periods: a.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022402
On 17 April 2012, the commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14-12c(2), misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs; specifically for wrongfully using marijuana (111107 - 111207). Based on the above misconduct, the commander recommended a general, under honorable conditions discharge. It appears the urinalysis was properly coded RO, as such the Article 15 was improperly based on the limited use evidence.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022403
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 17 August 2011, the commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 13, Separation for Unsatisfactory Performance. On 7 October 2011, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022404
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 February 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for the use of methamphetamine x 4 (070619, 071116, 071226, and 080117), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 February 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022405
The applicant states, in effect, that that after being discharged from military service, he self-enrolled in a treatment program in October 2010 and completed the program 14 December 2010. POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: The applicant states, in effect, that he had self-enrolled and completed a treatment program. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022413
On 3 October 2011, the commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), commission of a serious offense, misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs. On 21 October 2011, the separation authority approved and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022415
It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with a characterization of service described as uncharacterized. If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022476
She was 18 years old at the time of entry and a high school graduate. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD: There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record. The applicants record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the former Soldiers discharge from the Army; however, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214, signed by the applicant, which indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022482
The counsel-authored statement provides that the general, under honorable conditions discharge with a separation code of JNC precludes the applicant from rejoining the Army or any other military service component, and that the appellant requests to evaluate his case and file, and upgrade his discharge to an honorable discharge and remove the JNC separation code based on his service record and achievements. AR 600-8-24, paragraph 1-22a, provides that an officer will normally receive an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022544
On 10 September 2003, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. f. Specification 5: Dishonorably failed to pay debt in the amount of $28,444.65, to Bank of America (020204-020701), Plea: Not Guilty. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022545
Given that he earned all of these awards, he doesnt feel a general under honorable conditions discharge is a fair characterization of his service which was honorable. Discharge received: General, Under Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 21 January 2003 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE: Other Designated Physical or Mental Conditions, AR 635-200, Chapter 5-17, JFV, RE-3 e. Unit of assignment: C Co, 2-27th Infantry Regiment, Schofield Barracks, HI f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 17...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022546
IN THE CASE OF: Ms. BOARD DATE: 17 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120022546 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022547
The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. Further, although the applicant indicated she was a victim of rape during her military service, there is no evidence in her military records and the applicant has not provided sufficient evidence supporting this contention. Therefore, based on the available evidence and the presumption of government regularity, based on the discharge order...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022548
IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 April 2013 CASE NUMBER: AR20120022548 ___________________________________________________________________________ Board Determination and Directed Action After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review, and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. The applicant requests his under other than...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022550
On 16 May 2006, the separation authority approved the applicants unconditional waiver to a hearing before an administrative separation board, waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for the commission of a serious offense. The applicant was separated on 23 May 2006, under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 14-12c for misconduct...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022551
The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, with the reason specified as entry level performance and conduct, and the characterization described as uncharacterized. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with a characterization of service described as uncharacterized. However, the Army Discharge Review Board considered...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022552
A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldiers separation specifically allows such characterization. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. The applicant contends that an upgrade of his discharge would allow educational benefits through the use of the GI Bill.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022553
He served for 2 years, 10 months and 2 days and was discharged for pattern of misconduct, specifically for multiple failures to report. The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 6 April 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200 by reason of pattern of misconduct for failure to report on multiple occasions. On 14 April 2011, the separation authority...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022554
Discharge Received: Under Other than Honorable c. Date of Discharge: 15 November 2012 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial / AR 635-200, Chapter 10, KFS / RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: 247th MP Detachment, U.S. Army Japan MP Bn (Provisional), Torii Station, Okinawa, Japan f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: NIF- record shows an ETS date of 24 October 2014 5 July 2006 / 4 years 20 weeks (initial enlistment) g. Current Enlistment Service: 6 years, 4 months, 11 days...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022555
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 15 January 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, her military records, and the issues submitted with the application, there are...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022556
The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents such as the discharge packet or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. Therefore, based on the available evidence, it appears the reason for discharge and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022557
The separation authority approved the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, the service record indicates that someone in the discharge process erroneously entered the reason for separation as pattern of misconduct, authority as AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, and SPD code of JKA. However, the separation authority approved the discharge under the provisions of AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c, for misconduct (serious offense).
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022558
The applicant was separated from the Army on 4 May 2011 with an uncharacterized discharge. EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT: The applicant provided a character reference letter, dated 3 March 2012 in addition to his application. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022559
On 19 November 2007, she submitted her request for voluntary separation under the provisions of Chapter 8, AR 635-200, by reason of pregnancy. On 19 November 2007, the separation authority approved the separation action with an honorable discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations in effect at the time for a discharge under this Chapter is "Pregnancy and the separation code is "KDF."
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022564
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 16 February 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs for the wrongful use of marijuana x 2 between (101010 and 101110 and 101201 and 110101). On 25 February 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022566
The applicant requests an upgrade of his discharge characterization from general, under honorable conditions to honorable and a change to the narrative reason for the discharge, and the SPD and RE codes. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The applicants statements alone do not overcome the governments presumption of regularity and no additional corroborating and supporting documentation or further evidence...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022567
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant's service record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 8 August 2006; he was 19 years old at the time and a high school graduate. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING: Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 1 May 2013 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify: No Counsel:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022571
The evidence contained in the applicants service record indicates that on 6 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 7, Section IV, paragraph 7-17, AR 635-200, for fraudulent entry, for entering a contract with the Army with false high school transcripts. On 20 March 2006, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. ...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022576
The evidence of record shows that on 27 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of physical condition, not a disability for being diagnosed by competent medical authority with a chronic mood and anxiety disorder. On 6 November 2003, the separation authority directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022579
The reasons for separation, including the specific circumstances that form the basis for the discharge are considered on the issue of characterization. The burden of proof remains with the applicant to provide the appropriate documents such as the discharge packet or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board's consideration. Therefore, based on the available evidence, it appears the reason for discharge and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022581
Applicant Name: ????? On 25 June 2009, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request and directed the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022584
Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. The evidence contained in the applicants record indicates that on 27 September 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, not a disability, specifically for having...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022586
The applicants service record shows that on 30 March 2011, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance specifically for: * failing two consecutive record APFTs (110202, 101104) * failure to report on 10 occasions (100722, 100726, 100805, 101115, 101117, 110118, 110302, 110307, 110308, and 110310) 2. The applicant was discharged from the Army on 10 May 2011, with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022592
Discharge Received: Under Other than Honorable Conditions c. Date of Discharge: 6 June 2003 d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE Code: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial / AR 635-200, Chapter 10 / KFS / RE-4 e. Unit of assignment: HHC, 3rd Bn, 69th Armor, Fort Stewart, GA f. Current Enlistment Date/Term: 4 October 2001/ 3 years g. Current Enlistment Service: 1 year, 7 months, 13 days h. Total Service: 1 year, 7 months, 13 days i. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022599
He served in Korea and completed 3 years, 4 months, and 27 days of active duty service. The separation authority approved the recommendation and directed the applicants discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. However, after examining the applicants record of service, his military records, the documents and the issues submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022602
Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 19 October 2010, for a period of four years. The record shows that on 3 May 2012, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct, for the following offenses: a. On 9 May 2012, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicants discharge with...