Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022584
Original file (AR20120022584.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:  	

      BOARD DATE:  	 22 May 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20120022584
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.





      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to honorable.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that she was going through difficult times and now has a son 
she must care for.  She would like the opportunity to make her life better.

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		10 December 2012
b. Discharge received:			Uncharacterized
c. Date of Discharge:			7 October 2010
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Physical Condition, Not a Disability, AR 635-200 						Chapter 5-17, JFV, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment:			HHC, 46th AG Bn, Fort Knox, KY
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:	30 August 2010, 4 years	
g. Current Enlistment Service:	0 years, 1 month, 8 days
h. Total Service:			0 years, 1 month, 8 days
i. Time Lost:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		None
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-3
l.  Military Occupational Specialty:	None
m. GT Score:				95
n. Education:				HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service:			None
p. Combat Service:			None
q. Decorations/Awards:		NDSM
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		Yes
u. Prior Board Review:			No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 30 August 2010, for a period of 4 years.  She was 19 years old at the time of entry and was a high school graduate.  Her record does not show any acts of valor or significant achievements.  At the time of her discharge she was serving at Fort Knox, KY.

SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

1.  The evidence contained in the applicant’s record indicates that on 27 September 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, not a disability, specifically for having been diagnosed by competent medical authority with schizophrenia, which was incompatible with military service.

2.  The unit commander recommended an entry level discharge with service uncharacterized and advised the applicant of her rights.

3.  On 27 September 2010, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement on her behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Service.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with an uncharacterized discharge.  

4.  On 4 October 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with an uncharacterized characterization of service.

5.  The applicant was discharged from the Army on 7 October 2010, with a characterization of service listed as uncharacterized.

6.  The applicant’s service record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.  

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD

1.  Mental Status Evaluations, dated 8 September 2010 and 24 September 2010, which indicate a diagnosis of schizophrenia and recommendation of separation.

2.  Three counseling statements dated 6 September 2010 (2), and 13 September 2010, for lack of motivation, disrespectful to Army core values, disobeying a lawful order from an NCO and initiation of separation proceedings.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT 

 The applicant did not provide any additional documents with the application.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

None provided with the application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY  

1.  Army Regulation (AR) 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty and requires that the diagnosis be so severe that the Soldier’s ability to function in the military environment is significantly impaired.  

2.  AR 635-200, paragraph 5-1, states that a Soldier being separated under this paragraph will be awarded a characterization of service of honorable, under honorable conditions, or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.  It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service.

3.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17 unless properly notified of the specific factors in the service that warrant such characterization.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of her discharge was carefully considered.  However, after a careful review of all the available records for the period of enlistment under review and the issues submitted with the application, there were insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
      
2.  The evidence of record shows the applicant, while in training status, was diagnosed by competent medical authority with schizophrenia, a condition which was incompatible with military service.  It was determined that this physical condition interfered with her ability to perform her duties and to function in the military environment.    
      
3.  The applicant’s service was uncharacterized because she was in entry-level status.  A Soldier is in entry-level status (ELS) for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.  The purpose of the entry-level status is to provide the Soldier a probationary period.  AR 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a Soldier’s service will be uncharacterized when the separation is initiated while the Soldier is in entry level status.  
      
4.  A general, under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions and an honorable discharge may be granted only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.  The applicant’s service record contains no such unusual circumstances were present and his service did not warrant an honorable discharge.  The record does not contain any evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command and it appears that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the applicant’s rights were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

5.  Further, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include medical and educational benefits under the Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.

6.  Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service being both proper and equitable, recommend the board deny relief. 

      
SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing: Records Review       Date:    22 May 2013	Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers: NA

Board Vote:
Character Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason Change:	0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:			No
Change Characterization to:		No Change
Change Reason to:				No Change
Change RE Code to:			No Change
Grade Restoration to:			NA
Change Authority for Separation:		No Change







































Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTH - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR 20120022584		

Page 5 of 5 pages



ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005664

    Original file (AR20130005664.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 4 October 2010, for a period of 4 years and 23 weeks. On 16 November 2010, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130000292

    Original file (AR20130000292.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve on 9 June 2009 for a period of 8 years, and reported to her active duty training on 28 December 2009. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130007904

    Original file (AR20130007904.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Prior Board Review: No SUMMARY OF SERVICE: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 31 July 2012, for a period of 3 years and 24 weeks. On 25 January 2013, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with an uncharacterized separation of service. It further states that a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008127

    Original file (AR20080008127.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013907

    Original file (AR20070013907.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 12 January 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-17, AR 635-200, by reason of other designated physical or mental condition, problems incompatible with military service, and recommended that she be discharged with an entry level uncharacterized separation of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015941

    Original file (AR20080015941.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130011179

    Original file (AR20130011179.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 27 March 2013, the separation authority directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of an uncharacterized discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a Soldier is in an entry-level status if the Soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action. An RE Code of 3 indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070011766

    Original file (AR20070011766.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 15, AR 635-200, by reason of homosexual conduct for making a statement admitting that she is bisexual and could not abide by the Army's homosexual policy, with an uncharacterized discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130004673

    Original file (AR20130004673.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of a change to the narrative reason of the applicant’s discharge to “Secretarial Authority,” under the provisions of Chapter 5-3, AR 635-200, with a corresponding SPD Code of “JFF,” and a reentry code (RE) of “1.” Presiding Officer I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case. On 12 March 2004, the separation authority approved the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130016363

    Original file (AR20130016363.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the applicant’s characterization of service was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. The record indicates the applicant was separated from the Army for homosexual admission, with an uncharacterized discharge. The service record indicates that on 16 June 2003, the unit commander...