Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120022415
Original file (AR20120022415.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
      IN THE CASE OF:  

      BOARD DATE:  	3 May 2013

      CASE NUMBER:  	AR20120022415
___________________________________________________________________________

Board Determination and Directed Action

After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the Discussion and Recommendation which follows, the Board determined the discharge to be both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.





      
      Presiding Officer
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Department of the Army Discharge Review Board in this case.

THE APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND STATEMENT:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his uncharacterized discharge to general, under honorable conditions and a change to the narrative reason for the discharge.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he wants to rejoin the Army.  He spoke to an Army Recruiter and was told he would be eligible to reenlist in February of 2013.  He knows that he messed up when he was on active duty at Fort Leonard Wood but he has truly changed and promises he will never mess up again.  He believes he can make a difference in the Army and wants to make it his career.  

DISCHARGE UNDER REVIEW INFORMATION:

a. Application Receipt Date:		3 December 2012
b. Discharge received:			Uncharacterized
c. Date of Discharge:			16 August 2012
d. Reason/Authority/SPD/RE:		Entry Level Performance and Conduct, Chapter 11 						AR 635-200, JGA, RE-3
e. Unit of assignment:			Co C, 787th MP Bn, Fort Leonard Wood, MO
f. Current Enlistment Date/Term:  	24 July 2012, 5 years
g. Current Enlistment Service:  	0 years, 0 months, 23 days
h. Total Service:			0 years, 0 months, 23 days
i. Time Lost:				None
j. Previous Discharges:		None
k. Highest Grade Achieved:		E-3
l. Military Occupational Specialty:	None
m. GT Score:				NIF
n. Education:				HS Graduate
o. Overseas Service:			None
p. Combat Service:			None
q. Decorations/Awards:		None
r. Administrative Separation Board: 	No
s. Performance Ratings:		None
t. Counseling Statements:		None
u. Prior Board Review:			No
SUMMARY OF SERVICE:		
	
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 July 2012, for a period of 5 years.  He was 18 years old at the time of entry and was a high school graduate.  He was attending basic training at Fort Leonard Wood, MO when his separation was initiated.

SEPARATION FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES

1.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to the discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant’s signature.  

2.  The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, with the reason specified as entry level performance and conduct, and the characterization described as uncharacterized.  The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of JGA and a reentry (RE) code of 3.  

3.  The applicant’s record does not show any record of actions under the UCMJ or unauthorized absences or time lost.

4.  On 15 August 2012, HQDA USA Maneuver Support Center, Fort Leonard Wood, MO, Orders Number 228-1304, discharged the applicant from the Army effective 16 August 2012.

5.  The applicant’s record does not contain any evidence of unauthorized absences or time lost.  

EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD

There are no counseling statements or UCMJ actions in the record.

EVIDENCE SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT 

 The applicant provided no supporting documents with the application.

POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: 

None provided with the application.

REGULATORY AUTHORITY  

1.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 3-9 contains guidance on entry level separations.  It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service.

2.  Chapter 11 of Army Regulation 635-200 provides for the separation of personnel due to unsatisfactory performance, conduct, or both, while in an entry level status (ELS).  An uncharacterized service description is normally granted to Soldiers separating under this chapter.  

3.  A general discharge (GD) under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under ELS conditions and an honorable discharge (HD) is rarely ever granted.  An HD may be given only in cases which are clearly warranted by unusual circumstances involving outstanding personal conduct and/or performance of duty.

DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The applicant’s request for an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge and a change to the narrative reason was carefully considered.  However, after examining the applicant’s military records and the issue submitted with the application, there are insufficient mitigating factors to merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge or a change to the narrative reason for the separation.  

2.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events which led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and government regularity is presumed in the discharge process.  

3.  The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with a characterization of service described as uncharacterized.  Barring evidence to the contrary, it appears that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  

4.  The applicant contends that he would like an upgrade of his discharge to general, under honorable conditions to rejoin the Army and make it a career.  However, a general under honorable conditions discharge is not authorized under entry level status.  Moreover, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.  Based on AR 635-5-1 and the SPD Code/RE Code Cross Reference Table the applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3.  There are no basis upon which to grant a change to the reason or to the RE code.  An RE Code of 3 indicates the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist.  If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact a local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist.  Recruiters can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate. 

5.  If the applicant desires a personal appearance hearing, it will be his responsibility to meet the burden of proof and provide the appropriate documents (i.e., the discharge packet) or other evidence sufficient to explain the facts, circumstances, and reasons underlying the separation action, for the Board’s consideration because they are not available in the official record.

6.  Therefore, based on the available evidence, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service appear to be proper and equitable, thus recommend the Board deny relief. 


SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING:

Type of Hearing: Records Review	Date: 3 May 2013	       Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  No 

Counsel:  None

Witnesses/Observers:  NA

Board Vote:
Character  	Change:  0	No Change:  5
Reason	Change:  0	No Change:  5
(Board member names available upon request)

Board Action Directed:
Issue a new DD Form 214:			No
Change Characterization to:		No Change
Change Reason to:				No Change
Change RE Code to:			No Change
Grade Restoration to:			NA
Change Authority for Separation:		No Change

























Legend:
AMHRR - Army Military Human Resource Record	FG - Field Grade	IADT – Initial Active Duty Training	 	RE - Reentry
AWOL - Absent Without Leave	GD - General Discharge	NA - Not applicable	SCM- Summary Court Martial
BCD - Bad Conduct Discharge	HS - High School	NIF - Not in File	SPCM - Special Court Martial
CG - Company Grade Article 15	HD - Honorable Discharge	OAD - Ordered to Active Duty	UNC - Uncharacterized Discharge  
CID - Criminal investigation Department	MP – Military Police	OMPF - Official Military Personnel File	UOTH - Under Other Than                           			               Honorable
ADRB Case Report and Directive (cont)		AR 20120022415		

5



ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (ADRB)

CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE



1


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2015 | AR20150001587

    Original file (AR20150001587.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Entry Level Performance and Conduct," and the separation code is "JGA." However, in review of the applicant’s available service record and the reasons for the discharge,...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003883

    Original file (AR20130003883.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was separated from the Army on 25 June 2012, with an uncharacterized discharge. POST-SERVICE ACTIVITY: The applicant did not provide any with his application. SUMMARY OF ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING: Type of Hearing: Records Review Date: 24 July 2013 Location: Washington, DC Did the Applicant Testify: No Counsel: NA Board Vote: Character Change: 0 No Change: 5 Reason Change: 0 No Change: 5 (Board member names available upon request) Board Action Directed: Issue a new...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130003974

    Original file (AR20130003974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests an upgrade of her discharge from uncharacterized to general under honorable conditions and a change to the narrative reason for separation to medical. It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130009818

    Original file (AR20130009818.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The evidence of record shows that on 8 March 2013, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for being evaluated by medical personnel for pain in her back. EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE APPLICANT'S RECORD The record contains three negative counseling statements, dated 27 February 2013; all of them were for being recommended for Chapter 11, entry level separation. ...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120010165

    Original file (AR20120010165.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review the issues, and documents submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130014659

    Original file (AR20130014659.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates that on 18 January 2002, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, with the reason specified as entry level performance and conduct and the characterization of service described as uncharacterized. Army Regulation 635-5-1 (Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes) provides the specific authorities (regulatory or directive), reasons for separating Soldiers from active duty, and the SPD codes to be entered on the DD Form 214. The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080017486

    Original file (AR20080017486.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Finally, the analyst determined that the applicant’s Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) does not contain all the specific documents that would indicate the reason for the separation action from the United States Army. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2013 | AR20130005502

    Original file (AR20130005502.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    It states a separation will be described as entry-level with service uncharacterized if, at the time separation action is initiated, the Soldier has less than 180 days of continuous active duty service. The separation authority approved the applicant's discharge as entry-level status, with the description of service as uncharacterized. However, Soldiers being processed for separation are assigned reentry codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120007596

    Original file (AR20120007596.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 25 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s separation from the Army with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issues and documents submitted with the application, the analyst noted from the evidence of record that the applicant received an uncharacterized separation while in an entry-level status (ELS). Army...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120004493

    Original file (AR20120004493.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Furthermore, he states he would like to further his education. Army Regulation 635-200 provides in pertinent part, that a Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty.