Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110022259
Original file (AR20110022259.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/11/07	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, he is requesting a change to his discharge.  His  DD 214 currently states "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," but he was discharged for going AWOL with his wife who was in the Army also.  He failed a drug test previously for marijuana.  He did extra duty and completed a substance abuse class for that offense.  He is requesting his RE Code be changed for "4" to "3" so that  he can reenlist or find a job.  It has been 5 years since the incident and now he has two kids (one with a health condition).  He has been clean since and a changed man.  

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: NIF
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 070409   Chapter: 14-12c (2)       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct (Drug Abuse)	   RE:     SPD: JKK   Unit/Location: B Company, 187th Ordnance Battalion, Fort Jackson, SC  

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 070209, wrongfully used marijuana (061219-070104), forfeiture of $650.00x 2, extra duty and restriction for 45 days. (FG)

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  19
Current ENL Date: 060830    Current ENL Term: 04 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	00 Yrs, 07 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Total Service:  		00 Yrs, 07 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	None
Highest Grade: E-2		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: None   GT: 98   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: None   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed by the applicant

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  
       
       The applicant declined the opportunity to speak with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  
       
       The separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and the issue and documents submitted with the application, the analyst determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  The applicant, by violating the Army's policy not to possess or use illegal drugs, compromised the trust and confidence placed in a Soldier.  The applicant, as a Soldier, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies.  By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. 
       
       The applicant contends he is requesting a change to his discharge.  His  DD 214 currently states "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)," but he was discharged for going AWOL with his wife who was in the Army also.  A review of the record shows that he was separated under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200 with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)", and the separation code is "JKK."  Army Regulation 635-5, Separation Documents, governs preparation of the DD Form 214 and dictates that entry of the narrative reason for separation, entered in block 28 and separation code, entered in block 26 of the form, will be entered exactly as listed in tables 2-2 or 2-3 of AR 635-5-1, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Codes.  The regulation further stipulates that no deviation is authorized.  There is no provision for any other reason to be entered under this regulation.  Furthermore, a review of the commander's notification letter shows the applicant acknowledged that he was being discharged for commission of a serious offense (wrongfully using marijuana).  Therefore, the analyst found no evidence of arbitrary or capricious actions by the command.  The analyst was satisfied that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.   
       
             Further, the applicant is requesting his RE Code be changed from "4" to "3" so that  he can reenlist or find a job.  It has been 5 years since the incident and now he has two kids (one with a health condition).  The analyst noted the applicant's issues about his desire to rejoin the Service, to have better job opportunities and the benefits of the GI Bill.  However, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities.  At the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of “4.”  








An RE code of “4” cannot be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible for reenlistment.  Additionally, eligibility for veteran's benefits to include educational benefits under the Post-9/11 or Montgomery GI Bill does not fall within the purview of the Army Discharge Review Board.  Accordingly, the applicant should contact a local office of the Department of Veterans Affairs for further assistance.

       Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 2 May 2012         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, DD Form 214, and an Army Substance Abuse Program Certificate, 

VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 






























        
IX.  Board Decision						
Board Vote:
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)

X.  Board Action Directed
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to: 
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: NA

XI.  Certification Signature
Approval Authority:




EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board




BONITA E. TROTMAN
Lieutenant Colonel, U. S. Army
Secretary Recorder




















Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110022259
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 4 of 4 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090014689

    Original file (AR20090014689.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100017062

    Original file (AR20100017062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 5 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he wrongfully used marijuana on two separate occasions, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100011811

    Original file (AR20100011811.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c(2) by reason of misconduct abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge. The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c (2) by reason of misconduct abuse of illegal drugs, with a characterization of service of...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110012195

    Original file (AR20110012195.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 19 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for having wrongfully used marijuana between (070113 and 070213), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The analyst noted the applicant's issues of wanting to get back into the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | AR20110024331

    Original file (AR20110024331.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 13 September 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions . Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, dated (111125); Letter, University of Maine, dated (110803); and a Letter of Intent and Athletic Scholarship Agreement, dated (111103).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100019556

    Original file (AR20100019556.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? He has been sober of drugs and alcohol since the day he was discharged. On 28 February 2008, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008567

    Original file (AR20120008567.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 22 June 2004, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions. On 23 September 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of under other than...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100008623

    Original file (AR20100008623.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 10 June 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090005810

    Original file (AR20090005810.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 9 June 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, Paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongful use of marijuana (031202); the applicant was caught smoking marijuana and admitted to it during questioning by CID, and convicted by a Summary Court-Martial for this...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015316

    Original file (AR20080015316.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 17 November 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for having tested positive for wrongful use of marijuana (060826-060926), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Misconduct (Drug Abuse)",...