Applicant Name: ??
Application Receipt Date: 2010/02/12 Prior Review: Prior Review Date: 25 October 2010, denied.
I. Applicant Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: The applicant states, "When i was in the military, I was young, immature and really didn't know how to take things serious in life.I hooked up with the wrong crowd and I tried to be a follower and not a leader. 2 1/2 years later I realize that life wouldof been alot better if I stayed in. im married now and older and mature. My wife and I have been homless, in and out of shelters and on welfare. She's stayed by my side this whole time even though it has not been easy at all. My goal is to get back into the military and if the petition is granted, I will make this country proud. I will show up on time to work, Do my job to the best of my ability. The saying goes, You don't know what you've got till its gone. I had a good thing with the military. I'm just asking to get one more chance. I won't let you down."
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Tender Offer: NA
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 080508
Discharge Received: Date: 080604 Chapter: 14-12b AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of Misconduct RE: SPD: JKA Unit/Location: 590th Field Service Company, Ft. Drum, NY
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 080118, failed to go at the time prescribed to his designated place of duty on five occasions (between 071023-071113), willfully disobeyed a lawful order from a senior noncommissioned officer (071111); reduction to E1, forfeiture of $200 pay per month for two months, 45 days of restriction and extra duty, and an oral reprimand (FG).
071016, failed to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty (070930), reduction to E2, forfeiture of $340 pay per month for one month (suspended), 14 days of extra duty (CG).
Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Age at current enlistment: 20
Current ENL Date: 051031 Current ENL Term: 3 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 07Mos, 04Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 07Mos, 04Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E3 Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 92S10 Shower, Laundry and Clothing GT: 92 EDU: GED Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
City, State: Watertown, NY
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
The evidence of record shows that on 6 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12b, AR 635-200, by reason of pattern of misconduct for failing to report x 10 (070320, 070930, 071019, 071023, 071105, 071113, 071114, 071130, 071204, 080229) and for receiving a Company Grade Article 15 on (071016) and a Field Grade Article 15 on (080118), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights.
On 8 May 2008, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the Army and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.
The analyst determined that the applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of the former Soldiers service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.
The applicant contends that he was young and immature at the time he was discharged. However, the analyst noted that the applicant met entrance qualification standards to include age. There is no evidence that the applicant was any less mature than other Soldiers of the same age who successfully completed military service.
The analyst noted the applicant's issue concerning his strong desire to have one more chance and serve again. However, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. If reenlistment is desired, the applicant should contact the local recruiter to determine eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of reentry eligibility (RE) codes if appropriate.
Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 22 March 2012 Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: None
Witnesses/Observers: Applicant's spouse.
Exhibits Submitted: Four character reference letters, DD Form 214 and a copy of his OMPF
VIII. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
IX. Board Decision
XI. Certification Signature
Board Vote: Approval Authority:
Character - Change 0 No change 5
Reason - Change 0 No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
EDGAR J. YANGER
Colonel, U.S. Army
X. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
Legend:
AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial
BCD Bad Conduct Discharge GD General Discharge NIF Not in the file SPCM Special Court Martial
CG Company Grade Article 15 HD Honorable Discharge OAD Ordered to Active Duty UNC Uncharacterized Discharge
DD Dishonorable Discharge HS High School Graduate OMPF Official Military Personnel File UOTH Under Other Than Honorable
FG Field Grade Article 15 IADT Initial Active Duty Training RE Reentry Code Conditions
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20110005001
______________________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 3 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018039
Applicant Name: ????? Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293, Statement of support, NGB Form 22, and DD Form 214 for the period of service under review. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA Legend: AWOL Absent Without Leave GCM General Court Martial NA Not applicable SCM Summary Court Martial BCD Bad...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090015343
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 November 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c(2), AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs) for having tested positive for cocaine (071030), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007094
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 January 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (testing postive for methylendioxymethamphetamine (Ecstasy), disrespect to a noncommissioned officer, and drunk and disorderly on two occasions), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014153
Applicant Name: ????? Having examined the above documentation, the analyst determined that the applicant's discharge was not the result of any medical condition and that he was administratively discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200 by reason of misconduct- pattern of misconduct. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070016594
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 30 August 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct (drug abuse) for wrongful use of marijuana (060311-060410 and 060514-060614), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080012690
On 30 January 2008, the separation authority approved the discharge with with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted to deny relief. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080016148
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 20 August 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor being absent without official leave and on numerous occasions failing to be at her appointed place of duty, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090006365
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 13 May 2008, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12b, AR 635-200, by pattern of misconduct for derelict in his duty x2 on (060817 and 061018), disobeyed a lawful order x3 on (061024, 061013, and 080207) and failed to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty x3 (071210, 080205 and 080211) and operated a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018167
Applicant Name: ????? On 5 March 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090001569
Applicant Name: ????? On 3 August 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No Change Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...