Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110003663
Original file (AR20110003663.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Applicant Name:  ?????

Application Receipt Date: 2011/02/22	Prior Review:     Prior Review Date: NA     

I.  Applicant Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he was discharged from the Army in January under honorable conditions and he would like an opportunity to succeed in life and get a better job.  He has been out for ten years and wants to do something better for his family. He applied for a few jobs and they asked him for an honorable discharge.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?	     
Tender Offer:   NA

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Discharge Under Review
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: 	   Date: 001219
Discharge Received: 			   Date: 010105   Chapter: 14-12c       AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct	   RE:     SPD: JKQ   Unit/Location: Battery A, Personnel and Support Battalion, US Army Field Artillery Center, Fort Sill, OK 

Time Lost: AWOL x 1 from (000616-000715) for 30 days.  The mode of return is unknown.  Military confinement from (000929-001211) for 73 days; as part of his punishment imposed from a General Court-Martial.

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 000607, wrongfully used cocaine between (000324-000327), reduction to SPC/(E-4), forfeiture of $748.00 pay per month for two months, extra duty and restriction for 45 days (FG).

Courts-Martial (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 000929, General Court-Martial for being absent without leave and wrongfully using cocaine.  He was sentenced to reduction to the grade of Private (E-1), forfeiture of $500.00 pay per month for 3 months and to be confined for 100 days.  However, the convening authority agreed to disapprove any confinement in excess of 3 months, and indicated that all other lawfully adjudged punishment may be approved.  

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
Age at current enlistment:  25
Current ENL Date: Reenl/991025    Current ENL Term: 5 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 	0 Yrs, 10 Mos, 27 Days ?????
Total Service:  		4 Yrs, 5 Mos, 6 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: 	USAR 960314-960501/NA
                                       RA      960502-991024/HD
Highest Grade: E-5		Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 14T10 Patriot Launching Station Enhanced Oper Maint   GT: 118   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Saudi Arabia (980215-980615)   Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, GCMDL, AFEMDL, ASR

V.  Post-Discharge Activity
City, State:  ?????
Post Service Accomplishments: None submitted by the applicant.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

       a.  Facts and Circumstances:
       The evidence of record shows that on 19 December 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense; in that he was absent without leave on or about (000616) and wrongfully used cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  On 19 December 2000, the applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  On 20 December 2000, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

       b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
       Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 14 of this regulation establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct.  Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave.  Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed.  Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate; however, a general, under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.   

       c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
       After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no mitigating factors which would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge.  
       
       The analyst determined that the applicant’s discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel.  By the misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.  
       
       The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicant’s service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance.  
       
       The analyst noted the applicant's issue that he was discharged from the Army under honorable conditions and would like an opportunity to succeed in life and get a better job.  The analyst considered the applicant’s quality of service during the initial portion of the enlistment under review.  However, this service was determined not to be sufficiently meritorious to warrant an upgrade to the characterization of discharge.  Further, the Board does not grant relief solely for the purpose of gaining employment or enhancing employment opportunities. 
       
       Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing

Type of Hearing: 		Date: 21 September 2011         Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: None

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 15 February 2011.





VIII.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. 
        
IX.  Board Decision						
	XI.  Certification Signature
Board Vote:  							          Approval Authority:	
Character - Change 0    No change 5
Reason -     Change 0    No change 5
(Board member names available upon request)
								         EDGAR J. YANGER			 
								         Colonel, U.S. Army
X.  Board Action Directed					         President, Army Discharge Review Board
Issue a new DD Form 214  					
Change Characterization to: 			         
Change Reason to: No Change
Other: No Change										
RE Code: 
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes   Grade: No Change





























Legend:
AWOL    	Absent Without Leave		GCM   General Court Martial	NA   Not applicable			SCM	Summary Court Martial
BCD   	Bad Conduct Discharge	GD      General Discharge	NIF   Not in the file			SPCM	Special Court Martial
CG 	Company Grade Article 15	HD      Honorable Discharge	OAD   Ordered to Active Duty		UNC	Uncharacterized Discharge  
DD 	Dishonorable Discharge	HS       High School Graduate	OMPF   Official Military Personnel File	UOTH  	Under Other Than Honorable 
FG	Field Grade Article 15		IADT   Initial Active Duty Training	RE     Reentry Code				Conditions 

ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20110003663
______________________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 3 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120008019

    Original file (AR20120008019.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 7 November 2011, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100018469

    Original file (AR20100018469.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 29 April 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120006787

    Original file (AR20120006787.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? There is no evidence in the record, nor has the applicant produced any evidence, to support the contention that being discharged was not her fault. Yes No Counsel: NA Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 149, dated (120323); Letter, Richland County Veterans Services Commission, dated (120326); and a DD Form 214, dated (070928).

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120001780

    Original file (AR20120001780.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2010, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using illegal drugs, he tested positive for cocaine and marijuana at a unit urinalysis (090911) for which he received a field grade Article 15, with a general, under honorable...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2011 | AR20110006744

    Original file (AR20110006744.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DD Form 214 indicates the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 14-12c by reason of misconduct, commission of a serious offense with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Yes No Counsel: None Witnesses/Observers: NA Exhibits Submitted: DD Form 293 dated 26 February 2011. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: No...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090010510

    Original file (AR20090010510.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 Sept 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for illegal use of drugs, cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 Sept 2005 the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submited a statement in...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2010 | AR20100007957

    Original file (AR20100007957.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant was discharged from the Army with a Bad Conduct Discharge and reduced to the lowest enlisted grade. After a thorough review of the applicant’s record and the issue submitted with the application, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommends to the Board to deny clemency.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080015861

    Original file (AR20080015861.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 2 October 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—for wrongful use of cocaine, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120003528

    Original file (AR20120003528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed action and recommended approval of the separation with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 September 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitation and directed the applicant’s discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | AR20090020958

    Original file (AR20090020958.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? On 14 July 2008, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both...