ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010168
Based upon that review, the Department of the Army, US Army Physical Evaluation Board, (WRAMC), Washington, DC, found no basis for a change in its action in reference to the applicant's case and reaffirmed its previous findings, and forwarded the case to the US Army Physical Disability Agency for review. Furthermore, the Board affirmed the findings of the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) of October 7, 2005 and the United States Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) review of November 7,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010182
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was appropriately discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, with a characterization of service of fully honorable. With this type of discharge, the applicant would have been diagnosed with a personality disorder by competent medical authority prior to his separation from service. The analyst noted the applicant's issue, however, the narrative reason for separation is governed by specific...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010217
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 August 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 on 28 June 2005, for going AWOL (050509 to 050613), and the wrongful use of marijuana between (050327 and 050427), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010229
The evidence of record indicates that the applicant was adjudged guilty by a court-martial and that the sentence was approved by the convening authority. After a thorough review of the applicants record and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommend to the Board no clemency. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 31...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010230
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. The regulation also permitted the characterization of service as under honorable conditions, but did not authorize the characterization of service as honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 31 July 2008 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010404
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 14 September 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010405
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 December 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for receiving a Summarized Article 15 (930728) for disrespecting and disobeying a noncommissioned officer; a Company Grade Article 15 (931004), for FTR and disobeying a noncommissioned officer; being charged (931125) by the Kaisserslautern Military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010410
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010411
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service, a Separation Code of JDG (i.e., parenthood), and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." The narrative reason specified by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010419
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. On 7 April 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation/ASAP failure, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Army policy states that an honorable or general discharge is authorized depending on the applicants overall record of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010422
Applicant Name: ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5-17, by reason of physical condition, not a disability, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge and a Reentry Eligibility (RE) code of "3." Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010427
Applicant Name: ????? The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010431
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010433
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and documents submitted by the applicant. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010434
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Paragraph 5-17 specifically provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, which interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation under provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-17, by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010435aC071121
However, the evidence of record shows that on 1 September 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge, with an SPD Code of KFS, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "4." However, the applicant’s record does contain the separations's authority memorandum discharging him from the Active Army National Guard/Reserve. Procedurally, the applicant was required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010437
Applicant Name: ????? It indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 8-26e (2), NGR 600-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug abuse, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions and a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of "3." Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 15 July 2008 Lieutenant Colonel,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010439
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 February 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010441
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 May 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010442
Application Receipt Date: 070726 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. The evidence of record shows the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) with a punitive discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant's issue; however, at the time of discharge the applicant was appropriately assigned a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 4. An RE code of 4 can not be waived and the applicant is no longer eligible...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010443
Applicant Name: ????? The Board determined that the overall length and quality of the applicants service; to include his combat service, mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010444
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate and senior commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010445
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SPC/E-4 XI.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010446
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 07 Mos, 24Days ????? On 8 December 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010449
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 March 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs (wrongfully used cocaine while he was a noncommissioned officer), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010454
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010455
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The analyst recommends to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remain both proper and equitable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010457
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant states he was not convicted of a civilian conviction, which was dismissed, but was discharged from active duty two days prior to civlian action. The Applicant's DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010462
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 28 October 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the Applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010464
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See attached DD Form 293 and supporting document submitted by the Applicant. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010489
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the Applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010526
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 April 1994, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010683
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an Administrative Separation Board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 5 May 1999, the separation authority approved the unconditional waiver to an Administrative...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010684
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010685
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 May 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for failure to adapt to military life, refusal to participate in training, and for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010688
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010689
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010690
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 05 Days ????? On 15 March 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010692
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 01 Mos, 05Days ????? It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010693
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 December 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for consistently being late to formations, failed to conform to Army standards, continues to be a disruptive influence in the unit, his conduct was prejudicial to good order and discipline, and displays no potential to succeed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010694
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 December 1993, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for willful dereliction of duty X 2 (930821 and 930822), false statement X 4 (930822), assault consummated by battery (930902) and negligently discharging a firearm (930822), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010696
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for a total of four positive urinalysis tests, a Company Grade and a Field Grade Article 15, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010697
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010698
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 21 June 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance for AWOL (060326-060327), drunk and disorderly (060324), failure to report (060209), and left his appointed place of duty (060201), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant waived legal counsel, was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010699
The intermediate and senior commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 12 July, again the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority's documentation waiving further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010700
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of case by an administrative separation board, and did submit a statement in his own behalf, which was not found in the available records. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 31 October 2005, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010701
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03 Mos, 05 Days ?????
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010702
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 02 Mos, 10 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 28 January 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for being apprehended for driving under the influence and tested positive for cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 March 2003, the separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010703
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The board recommended that the applicant be separated from the service for his misconduct and issuance of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 8 May 2006, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010704
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached document submitted by the applicant. Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 27 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant...