Applicant Name: ?????
Application Receipt Date: 070802
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 050225
Discharge Received: Date: 030516
Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct
RE: SPD: JKK
Unit/Location: D Co, 204th MI Bn, Fort Bliss, TX 79918
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 030127, wrongfully used cocaine between (030106-030109), reduction to E-1, forfeiture of $575 x 2 (suspended), extra duty for 45 days and restriction for 45 days (FG).
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
Year/Month: 8104
HOR City, State: East St. Louis, IL
Current ENL Date: 000307 Current ENL Term: 4 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 02 Mos, 10 Days ?????
Total Service: 03 Yrs, 02Mos, 10 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E-4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 96D10 Imagery Specialist GT: 117 EDU: 12 Years Overseas: None Combat: Combat
Decorations/Awards: ASR
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
Evidence of record shows that on 28 January 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for being apprehended for driving under the influence and tested positive for cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than general, under honorable conditions, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 10 March 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
The applicant's record contains an Administrative Memorandum of Reprimand dated 5 December 2002, for driving while intoxicated .
The applicant's record contains a Military Police report dated 12 November 2002.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period od enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 25 July 2008
Location: Washington, DC
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change 0 No change 5 - Character
Change 0 No change 5 - Reason
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief.
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: None
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 28 July 2008
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20070010702
______________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 5 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006031
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 28 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs, wrongful use of cocaine on divers occasions 1 December 2004-16 January 2005, wrongful possession of cocaine 13 January 2005, and conspiracy to wrongfully possess a controlled substance 13 January 2005), with an under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009445
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, requested consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008160
On 14 October 1997, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged from the service with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is now...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013016
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for the wrongful use of cocaine (050411-050418), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060005710
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 4 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (abuse of illegal drugs "cocaine"), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070018916
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016236
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for having received a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongful use of cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 18 December 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008508
On 24 February 2005, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The unit commander's recommendation and the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to include his combat service mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011666
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 08 Mos, 28 Days ????? On 30 January 1996, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011546
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...