ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009643
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 07 Mos, 11 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 2006, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor displaying a pattern of misconduct consisting of serious disciplinary infractions, for having received Article 15s for positive urinalysis (040624) and failure to report (051206), with a general under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009644
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander and intermediate commanders recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 30 November 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009648
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on or about 8 September 1993, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, specifically for having been sentenced to 7 years, 4 years to serve and 3 years on probation for the civilian conviction of possession of cocaine, with an other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 November 1993, the separation...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009650
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 April 2006, the unit commander notified the Applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of cocaine on or about 6 January 2006, with an under other that honorable conditions discharge. On 15 August 2006, the separation authority approved the conditional waiver request, waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009651
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 2 April 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009653
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waiving further rehabilitative efforts and directing that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions, documentation is not part of the available record, and the analyst presumed government regularity in the discharge process. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009654
Applicant Name: ????? On 9 July 2002, the separation authority approved the Chapter 10 request with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009655
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009656
Applicant Name: ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 29 January 2001, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009658
Applicant Name: ????? Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 03Mos, 17Days ????? A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the soldier for entry into the military service had it been detected at that time, and the medical condition does not disqualify the soldier...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009659
Applicant Name: ????? The unit commander's documentation recommending approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge is not part of the available record and the analyst presumed Government regularity in the discharge process. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009661
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 8, NGR 600-200, paragraph 8-260 (5), by reason of unsatisfactory performance for failure of two consecutive Army Physical Fitness Tests (APFT) (931107) and 940514), with an honorable discharge. Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve when it is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009663
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 May 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct for lack of motivation, with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review documents, and the issues...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009664
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009666
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. A Soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 18 July 2008 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009668
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 April 2001, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol or other drug rehabilitation failure, with a honorable discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this chapter is "Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure", and the separation code is "JPD."
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009669
Applicant Name: ????? Chapter 8-26d of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, discharge and separation of enlisted personnel Army Regulation 135-178 provides for the separation of members of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve when it is determined that a service member is unqualified for further military service by reason of unsatisfactory performance. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009670
Applicant Name: ????? On 14 November 2002, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. By abusing illegal drugs, the applicant knowingly risked a military career and diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009671
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 7 December 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009734
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicants characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009805
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 July 1993, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009811
The applicant was directed to show cause for substandard duty performance and misconduct. The board recommended that the applicant be issued an honorable discharge. (5), and (11) by reason of substandard performance with an honorable characterization of service.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009922
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 214 submitted by the applicant. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009923
Applicant Name: ????? Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 060522 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: Co B, Installation Spt Bn, Fort Dix, NJ Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF Counseling Records Available: Yes No IV. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., for the good of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009927
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that he wants his reentry code changed from 3 To 1B or any code which allows him to join now. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009928
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant states, in effect, that Under the provisions of AR 635-200, he was only to receive a General under Honorable Conditions discharge if he had been convicted of an offense by a general courts-martial or more than one special courts-martial during my enlistment period. On 11 May 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-17,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009929
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 28 January 1998, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Army Regulation 635-200 provides that a soldier is in an...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009933
Applicant Name: ????? On 24 October 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009936
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 13 January 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense abuse of illegal drugs, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009948
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009949
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 18 April 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductfor being confined on 30 January 2006 at the Hoke County Dentention Center for First Degree Burglary, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 May 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009952
Applicant Name: ????? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an Administrative Separation Board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009953
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009954aC071121
On 24 November 2006, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009955
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., in lieu of trial by court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009956
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. A medical proceeding, regardless of the date completed, must establish that a medical condition was identified by appropriate medical authority within six months of the Soldiers initial entrance on active duty, that the condition would have permanently or temporarily disqualified the Soldier for entry into the military service had it been...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009958
Applicant Name: ????? Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009962
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 27 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for failure to obey lawful general orders and regulations, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009967
Applicant Name: ????? On 11 June 1999, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 080718 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009968
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the applicant. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009971
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for being convicted in a Summary Court-Martial (060215) for wrongful use of cocaine, and receiving a Field Grade Article 15 (051215) for wrongful use of methamhetamines and ecstacy, with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009974
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 3 May 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for a positive urinalysis for marijuana; receiving two Field Grade Article 15's; repeated AWOL's, and failure to obey a lawful order, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009976
Applicant Name: ????? Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. However, in review of the applicants entire service record, the analyst found that these accomplishments did not overcome the reason for discharge and characterization of service granted.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009991
Applicant Name: ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009992
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 June 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 (050323) for the wrongful use of cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The Board found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009993
The memorandum further indicates that the applicant's request was disapproved, and his defense counsel requested reconsideration of the applicant's request for separation in lieu of courts-martial. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070009995
Applicant Name: ????? That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of drug rehabilitation failure, with a characterization of service of honorable. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this Chapter is "Drug Rehabilitation Failure", and the separation code is "JPC."
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010002
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf, which was not found in the available records. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 30 April 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010081
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 February 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for abuse of illegal drugs, and AWOL (030104-030107), with an uncharacterized discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010128
With this type of discharge, the applicant would have been diagnosed with a personality disorder by competent medical authority prior to his separation from service. The analyst noted the applicant's issue, however, the narrative reason for separation is governed by specific directives. Additionally, the analyst noted the applicant's other issues concerning his time spent in Iraq, and his enlistment date in the Army, however, the Army Discharge Review Board is not empowered to make these...