ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006048
He was confined by the military authorities for a total of 75 days from (031029-040113). On 30 January 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions discharge, and that the charges that formed the basis for this action will be withdrawn from trial and dismissed effective the date of discharge. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006054
Current ENL Service: 06 Yrs, 01 Mos, 08 Days ????? His NGB Form 22 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Appendix A, Paragraph 1-27(p), NGR 600-200, and AR 600-43, by reason of conscientious objection, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions, and a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of "4." Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006055
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 10 June 2004, the applicant again consulted with legal counsel, and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by a administrative separation board, contingent upon his receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006084
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 04 Mos, 09 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070307 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006225
On 14 May 1991, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with service uncharacterized. A soldier is in entry-level status for the first 180 days of continuous active duty. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 23 February 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006347
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 4...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006353
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 17 April 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (abuse of a illegal drug "marijuana" which he possessed, used, and introduced to the SHAPE Community, his attempt to commit assault and for committing adultery), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006354
He was sentenced to be discharged with a bad-conduct discharge and confinement for 12 months. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006356
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 25 April 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 13, AR 635-200, by reason of unsatisfactory performance (on numerous occasions failed to be at his appointed place of duty at the prescribed time, even after receiving counseling, corrective training, nonjudicial punishment, and being barred to reenlistment. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006358
On 22 November 2005, the applicant voluntarily tendered his resignation from the service under the provisions of Chapter 4, AR 600-8-24, resignation in lieu of elimination proceedings. On 8 February 2006, the Deputy Assistant Secretary (Army Review Boards) approved the recommendation of the Army Ad Hoc Review Board and directed that the applicant be separated with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006361
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 08Mos, 21Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 May 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense (testing positive for cocaine on 30 April 2003), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006362
On 8 February 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions and that he be reduced to the grade of private E-1. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006364
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Yes No Counsel: N/A Witnesses/Observers: N/A Exhibits Submitted: N/A VIII.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006365
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA XI. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070308 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006367
Paragraph 5-17 provides that a Soldier may be separated for other physical or mental conditions not amounting to a disability under Army Regulation 635-40, that interferes with assignment to or performance of duty. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006371
On 1 May 2000, the applicant was discharged. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200, provides that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006372
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 4 February 2000, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct, with an uncharacterized discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review, hearing his testimony, and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006375
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges are preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court martial. The evidence of record shows the applicant was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006376
On 27 February 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. A general, under honorable conditions discharge is normally inappropriate for individuals separated under the provisions of Chapter 5-17. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records for the period of enlistment under...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006377
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 8 July 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 7-11c1, AR 135-178, by reason of misconduct-abuse of illegal drugs (he tested positive for cocaine), with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 3 November 1994, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006378
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070307 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006381
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 070307 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006388
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. On 29 September 2004, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and change the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006391
On 13 May 1991, the separation authority approved the bar to reenlistment, and directed that the applicant be advised that should he feel he would be unable to overcome the bar to reenlistment, he may request immediate discharge under the provisions of Chapter 16, AR 635-200. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The analyst noted that the unit commander properly initiated separation action under the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006392
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 09Mos, 07Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (receiving a Article 15 for failing to go to his appointed place of duty on three occasions, and for receiving several negative counseling statements), with a general, under honorable conditions...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006393
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Procedurally, the applicant was required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in writing, request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006698
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 06Mos, 17Days ????? His NGB Form 22 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8-26q, NGR 600-200 by reason of unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006699
The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicants military records, the issue and documents he submitted, the analyst found several mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006701
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 2 Mos, 29 Days ????? Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 9 March 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20060006701 Applicant Name:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006702
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 30 March 1998, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (you were apprehended for shoplifting at the main post exchange, and apprehended for shoplifting at the Airborne post exchange), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 8 April 1998, the separation authority waived further...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006703
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006704
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 5 Mos, 20 Days ????? Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: ROBERT L. HOUSE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 7 December 2006 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number AR20060006704 Applicant...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006705
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006707
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductcommission of a serious offense/abuse of illegal drugs (positive urinalysis for marijuana), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 November 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006709
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and change the narrative reason for...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006710
The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006711
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board contingent upon him receiving a characterization of service no less favorable than a general, under honorable conditions discharge and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006712
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 February 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (Violations of the UCMJ), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 March 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006714
Current ENL Service: 1 Yrs, 1 Mos, 2 Days ????? Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 22 July 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (received a Company Grade Article 15 for larceny, received another Company Grade Article 15 for failing to be at your appointed place of duty and received several counseling statements for behavioral...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006716
The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006717
On 18 May 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006718
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 4 Mos, 25 Days ????? The intermediate commanders reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 9 March 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006719
Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed? Current ENL Service: 3 Yrs, 5 Mos, 26 Days The applicant was placed on excess leave for a total of 1, 016 days from (940401-970110). Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 9 March 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006720
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006721
Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 04Mos, 20Days ????? Legal Basis for Separation: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-178 govern procedures for the administrative separation of enlisted personnel of the Army National Guard and Army Reserve. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 9 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006753
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Procedurally, the applicant was required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in writing, request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006786
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 11 February 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006787
Application Receipt Date: 060511 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Army Regulation 635-200, provides that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the soldier has not completed more than 180 days of creditable continuous active duty prior to the initiation of separation action.
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006788
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293. Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: NIF Discharge Received: Date: 960202 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu Of Trial By Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: B Company 477th Signal Bn 15th Signal Bde Fort Gordon, GA 30905 Time Lost: AWOL-11 days (951222-951230) and (960103-960104) mode of return to military control NIF. Certification Signature and...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006789
Current ENL Service: 2 Yrs, 2 Mos, 18 Days ????? On 29 April 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 9 March 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...