Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060006788
Original file (AR20060006788.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 060511	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See DD Form 293.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:   ?????

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: NIF
Discharge Received:     Date: 960202   
Chapter: 10    AR: 635-200
Reason: In Lieu Of Trial By Court-Martial
RE:     SPD: KFS
Unit/Location: B Company 477th Signal Bn 15th Signal Bde Fort Gordon, GA 30905 

Time Lost: AWOL-11 days (951222-951230) and (960103-960104) mode of return to military control NIF.  Applicant was confined by military authorities for 9 days (960123-960202).

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF
______________________________________________________________________
The applicant received a General Officer's Memorandum of Reprimand for driving while intoxicated, (890918).

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): NIF

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier’s Overall Record
DOB:  640711  
Current ENL Date: 950222    Current ENL Term: 6 Years  ?????
Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 11Mos, 10Days ?????
Total Service:  14 Yrs, 01Mos, 20 Days ?????
Previous Discharges: USAR-811121-820713/NA
                                      RA-820714-850512/HD
                                      RA-850513-890927/HD
                                      RA-890728-920316/HD
                                      RA-920317-950221/HD
Highest Grade: E6
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 31R10 Multichannel Transmission System Opeator/Maintainer   GT: 100   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany   Combat: SWA (900830-910328)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, AGCM (4), NDSM, SWASM w/2 BSS, NCOPDR w/2, ASR, OSR (4)
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  However, the record does contain a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant's signature.  His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.  Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS ( i.e., for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3."  On 1 February 1996, DA, HQ, United States Army Signal Center, Fort Gordon, GA, discharged the applicant from the Regular Army, effective date:  2 February 1996.  The applicant was to be reduced to the lowest enlisted rank.     

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt.  Army policy states that although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.
      

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant’s available records for the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst recommend that relief be denied in this case.  The applicant’s record is void of the specific facts and circumstances concerning the events that led to his discharge from the Army.  The analyst noted that the applicant’s record contains a properly constituted DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), which was not authenticated by the applicant's signature.  This document identifies the reason and characterization of the discharge and the analyst is presumming Government regularity in the discharge process.  The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service-in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge.  In connection with such a discharge, the applicant was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), with a punitive discharge.  Procedurally, the applicant was required to consult with defense counsel and to voluntarily, and in writing, request separation from the Army in lieu of trial by court-martial.  In doing so, the applicant admitted guilt to the stipulated or lesser-included offenses under the UCMJ.  In the absence of information to the contrary, it is presumed that all requirements of law and regulation were met and the rights of the applicant were fully protected throughout the separation process.  It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant would have been aware of that prior to requesting discharge.  Therefore, the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable.
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
         

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 070307              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      	Change     No change    (Character)
		 			       	Change     No change    (Reason)
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale,  the Board determined that the discharge was too harsh and as a result it is now inequitable.  The Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct; however, determined that the the overall length and quality of the applicant’s service, to include his combat service, and the time that has elasped since his discharge mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions.  The Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted not to change it.  This action entails a restoration of grade to SSG/E6    















Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Kenneth McFarley, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: SSG/E6

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


MARY E. SHAW				DATE: 070308
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060006788

Applicant Name:  Mr.        
______________________________________________________________________


Page 6 of 6 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008507

    Original file (AR20060008507.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 11 Mos, 06 Days item 12c, on DD the Form 214, net active service this period is incorrect, should read 10 yrs, 07 mos, 12 days. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual’s admission of guilt. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: None Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: SSG/E6 XI.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060005749

    Original file (AR20060005749.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Application Receipt Date: 060421 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 00 Mos, 25 Days ????? Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014777

    Original file (AR20060014777.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. The Board found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include his combat service, the circumstances surrounding the discharge, and his post service accomplishments, mitigated the...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060000121C080324

    Original file (AR20060000121C080324.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The entire chain of command recommended approval of the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial with an other than honorable conditions discharge. On 9 August 2005, the separation authority approved the applicant's request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial and directed he be discharged from the Army with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012032

    Original file (AR20060012032.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD Form 293 and attached documents. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review, the issues and documents she submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009220

    Original file (AR20060009220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 30 June 1994, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011520

    Original file (AR20060011520.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current ENL Service: 04 Yrs, 00 Mos, 19 Days ????? The unit and intermediate commanders recommended approval of the request for discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board does not condone the applicant’s...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008501

    Original file (AR20060008501.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060012268

    Original file (AR20060012268.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 10, AR 635-200, in lieu of trial by court-martial with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., in lieu of trial by court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4."

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009255

    Original file (AR20060009255.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Records show the applicant chain of command reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of an under other than honorable conditions discharge . It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. The Board found that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service, to include his combat service, the...