Application Receipt Date: 060505
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293 and attached documents.
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer: ?????
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 030409
Discharge Received: Date: 030501
Chapter: 14 AR: 635-200
Reason: Misconduct
RE: SPD: JKA
Unit/Location: Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 3d Battalion, 325th Airborne Infantry Regiment, 82d Airborne Division, Fort Bragg, NC
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 030311/Failure to go to his appointed place of duty on or about 030218, 030219, and 030220/(Company Grade)
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldiers Overall Record
DOB: 801101
Current ENL Date: 000725 Current ENL Term: 03 Years ?????
Current ENL Service: 02 Yrs, 09Mos, 07Days ?????
Total Service: 02 Yrs, 09Mos, 07Days ?????
Previous Discharges: None
Highest Grade: E4
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 11B1P (Infantryman) GT: 117 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: NDSM, ASR, Parachutist Badge
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None Listed
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
Evidence of record shows that on 9 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (receiving a Article 15 for failing to go to his appointed place of duty on three occasions, and for receiving several negative counseling statements), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 15 April 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicants military records during the period of enlistment under review and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no mitigating factors that would merit an upgrade of the applicant's discharge. The applicants discharge was appropriate because the quality of his service was not consistent with the Army's standards for acceptable personal conduct and performance of duty by military personnel. By his misconduct, the applicant diminished the quality of his service below that meriting a fully honorable discharge. The applicant provided no independent corroborating evidence demonstrating that either the command's action was erroneous or that the applicants service mitigated the misconduct or poor duty performance. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service remains both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date: 11 June 2007
Location: Atlanta
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change 0 No change 5 - Character
Change 0 No change 5 - Reason
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted not to change it.
Case report reviewed and verified by: Eric S. Moore, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to: NA
Other: NA
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
MARY E. SHAW DATE: 25 June 2007
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20060006392
Applicant Name: Mr.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 5 of 5 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060010978
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Therefore, it is recommended to the Board that the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 21 June 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007486
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 09Mos, 07Days ????? The NGB Form 22 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8, paragraph 8-26j(1), NGR 600-200, by reason of medically unfit for retention per Army Regulation 40-501, with service characterized as Honorable, and a re-entry eligibility (RE) code of '3'. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review,...
ARMY | DRB | CY2009 | ar20090007532
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 1 March 2007, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, paragraph 14-12c, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for committing violation of Article 86 (AWOL), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007483
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 29 March 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (he pleaded guility in Magistrate's Court to the offenses of DUI and leaving the scene of an accident, he also unlawfully entered a female barracks room, and received negative counseling statements for disobeying NCO's), with a general, under honorable...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008492
On 23 January 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant partial relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE:...
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080003730
Applicant Name: ????? Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record indicates that on 20 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure, his continued use of alcohol rendered him a failure, and further efforts to rehabilitate him were not practical, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Board Action Directed President, Army...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060004883
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. Certification Signature...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016565
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 22 August 2006, the applicant was charged with one specification of leaving his appointed place of duty on or about 3 August 2006; two specifications of willfully disobeying a lawful order from a superior noncommissioned officer on or about 29 July 2006 and on or about 3 August 2006; two specifications of disrespect towards superior noncommissioned officers, on or about 29 July 2006 and on or about 3 August 2006. The analyst...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015482
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 20 January 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconductpattern of misconduct (disrespected a noncommissioned officer X 3, on or about (040416, 050128, 050503); disrespected and disobeyed a noncommissioned officer on or about (050128); left her place of duty, and disobeyed a noncommissioned officer on or about (051011)), with...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015176
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongfully using marijuana (041018-041218), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. While the applicant's...