ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011752C070208
The DD Form 214 he was issued upon his discharge confirms he was separated under the provisions of paragraph 5-3, Army Regulation 635-200, by reason of personality disorder, and that his service was uncharacterized based on his ELS. The applicant’s record contains no information regarding his reenlistment processing in 1988, and the applicant has not provided any documentary evidence on this issue. Paragraph 5-13 of the separations regulation provides that a Soldier may be separated for...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011753C070208
The applicant authenticated this document with his signature indicating he was discharged under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, the character of service was Under Conditions Other Than Honorable and that the reason for discharge was Misconduct- frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil or military authorities. On 20 March 1980, the applicant was discharged after completing 1 year 9 months, and 16 days of active military service. Therefore, given...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011755C070208
He stated that sometime in 2002 or 2003, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) granted that all the NJPs be transferred to his Restricted Fiche. The evidence of record shows the Army Review Boards Agency in St. Louis transferred the applicant's Article 15 imposed on 17 October 1987 to the restricted portion of his OMPF without board action. There is no evidence of record which shows that any of the Article 15s were filed on his restricted fiche in error.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011763C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that his separation document (DD Form 214) be corrected by showing that he deployed and participated in Operation Iraqi Freedom, from 12 March 2003 through 30 August 2003. The applicant's DD Form 214, with an effective date of 31 October 2004, shows the applicant was honorably separated, by reason of completion of required active service, after completing 3 years of active military service. Item 12f of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows the applicant's...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011766C070208
The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, with an effective date of 27 January 2000; a copy of 18th Airborne Corps, Fort Bragg, North Carolina memorandum, subject: Award of the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for Operation Uphold Democracy - Haiti, dated 5 January 1995 with an enclosure; 37th Engineer Battalion (Combat) (Airborne), Fort Bragg memorandum, subject Award of the Award of the Expeditionary Medal for Operation Uphold Democracy - Haiti, dated 25 January 1995; a copy of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011767C070208
Richard T. Dunbar | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 12 February 1988, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he receive a Discharge Certificate Under Other Than Honorable Conditions. Therefore, given the circumstances in this case and his overall undistinguished record of service, there is insufficient evidence to support his request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011768C070208
The applicant states that there was a material error in her records when seen by the 1994 Captain Promotion Board, that her records did not contain her baccalaureate degree and she was nonselected for promotion. On 1 March 1994, the applicant was notified that she had been considered and nonselected for promotion by the 1994 Department of the Army Reserve Components Selection Board. Had that been the case, or as she contends the reason for her nonselection, it would not have been present...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011770C070208
LaVerne Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) be corrected by changing his separation code and the narrative reason for his separation. Pertinent Army regulations provide that prior to discharge or release from active duty, individuals will be assigned RE codes, based on their service records or the reason...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 20040011772C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Expert Infantryman Badge (EIB). Attendance at an infantry leadership school alone does not satisfy the prerequisites necessary to support award of the EIB. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004005715C070208
National Guard Bureau Federal Recognition Orders Number 27 AR, dated 4 February 2004, awarded the applicant permanent Federal Recognition for initial appointment to the grade of second lieutenant, effective 31 October 2003 with a date of rank of 1 September 2002. On 24 June 2005, the National Guard Bureau provided a two-page advisory opinion which essentially states: a. that NGB Personnel Policy and Readiness Division concurs that the applicant's date of rank needs to be adjusted due to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004007693C070208
The applicant’s military records are not available for review. Evidence of record shows the applicant's military service is within the required time frame for the award of the Army of Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp. Evidence of record shows the applicant's military record shows that while he was assigned to the 315th Infantry Regiment, his unit received campaign credit for the Ardennes-Alsace Campaign.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004009562C070208
James B. Gunlicks | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Combat Medical Badge (CMB). Documentation provided by the applicant also shows the request for award of the CMB to the applicant was coordinated by the CJTF180 CJ1 with Department of the Army, Military Awards Board, for review, clarification, and guidance.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004091940C070208
The applicant requests, in effect, that the Army Commendation Medal and two Army Achievement Medals be added to his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. This award order corresponds with the DA Form 4980, Certificate for Award of the Army Achievement Medal, dated 24 July 1991, the applicant provided with his application. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding the Good...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004095679C070208
The applicant requests that his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) rated disability for coronary heart disease be considered combat related. As such, without specific evidence that the applicant’s coronary artery disease was the direct, sole result of his diabetes, there is no basis for granting his request. The denial of the applicant’s request does not mean he will not be compensated for his service related disabilities.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004095887C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Counsel states, in effect, to please reconsider the applicant's record, together with the supporting evidence that is submitted to determine his eligibility for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. The applicant provided no conclusive evidence that while he served in Vietnam he was a Radio/Telephone Operator with the primary responsibility of accompanying infantry or infantry-type...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004096899C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Once the Department of the Air Force has authorized the Korean War Service Medal, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to have it added to his DD Form 214. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by awarding the applicant the Purple Heart for wounds sustained in action...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099890C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214, which was issued to the applicant at the expiration of his enlistment contract and on his release from active duty, on 27 January 1960, reflects the last name, "P----y, J—n J-----n." All documents on file in the applicant's service personnel records, to include those documents, which required his written signature, reflect the name "P----y, J—n J----- n." 6. A copy of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099892C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The applicant’s military records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army on 15 January 1976, was awarded the military occupational specialty of unit supply specialist, and was promoted to pay grade E-4.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099897C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 20 April 1984, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was initiating action to separate her under Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 13, for her recent acts of misconduct to include possession and use of a controlled substance, false swearing, and indecent acts with another female. On 31 May 1984, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of the above-cited regulation...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099898C070208
The applicant requests that his records be corrected to show that he was promoted to the pay grade of E-5. The applicant states, in effect, that he was unjustly not promoted to the pay grade of E-5 and that his promotions up to the pay grade of E-4 were unjustly delayed. Accordingly, there is no basis to promote him to that pay grade.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099899C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The separation packet which was prepared and which resulted in the applicant's separation is not on file in the applicant's service personnel record. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board during it 15-year statute of limitations for an upgrade of his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099900C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Once the award has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show his entitlement to the National Defense Service Medal and by issuing...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099901C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his records be corrected by upgrading his discharge, and by awarding him several months of back pay in the grade of E- 3. On 2 December 1985, the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his discharge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099910C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests, in effect, that he be allowed to execute a new Dental Additional Special Pay (DASP) contract effective from, in effect, 1 August 2002 through 31 July 2003 and that he be paid DASP for this period. The legal assistance attorney based his request on paragraph 14b of the Fiscal Year 2003 (FY03) dental special pay message (date time group R091206Z Sep 02/DA/DASG-PTZ)...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099916C070208
The record shows that neither the FSM nor the applicant took any action to request a change to the FSM’s SBP election to former spouse coverage within a year of the divorce decree being issued, as is required by law. On 10 November 2003, in letter response to a Congressional Inquiry, the DFAS indicated their records indicated the applicant did not request to change his SBP election to former spouse and that the applicant did not make a deemed election for former spouse coverage. The...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099918C070208
"; i. that on 30 September 2001, his [the applicant's] unit was activated under the provisions of Title 10 United States Code and that the AGR position held by Sergeant G was nullified; j. that another staff sergeant was promoted to sergeant first class/pay grade E-7 to replace the retiring sergeant first class and that this promotion created an available staff sergeant squad leader position in his unit; k. that there was a second staff sergeant/pay grade E-6 squad leader position available...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099920C070212
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resources Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 1993 criteria. The Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099920C070403
I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Based upon review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Army Human Resources Command, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered and is eligible for consideration for promotion to CW4 by a Special Selection Board (SSB) under the 1993 criteria. The Board...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099921C070208
On 20 September 1992, the applicant enlisted in the Army Reserve for 3 years. In November 2001, since the applicant had still not taken a physical examination, he was told by the HRC that they could no longer authorize an antedated reenlistment for him since it had been over 6 years since his discharge. As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file this...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099924C070208
On 15 October 1998, the applicant was notified that he would be released from active duty on 1 April 1999 and transferred to the USAR as a two time nonselection for promotion to major. The evidence of record shows the applicant was considered for promotion by the first available DA Reserve Components Selection Board and was selected for promotion to MAJ/04 on 19 July 2000. The evidence of record shows the applicant was serving on active duty when he met his 7 years time in grade under...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099925C070208
THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. Item #8 of his DD Form 149, dated 3 April 2003 should have read “Request issue of the Purple Heart due to shrapnel wounds sustained to my face and chin area on or about 3/17/1953 while injured in combat on Hill 355-Little Gibraltar. New evidence, not previously considered by the Board, requires reconsideration of the applicant’s request.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099937C070208
The applicant provides the following documents in support of her application: Leave and Earning Statements (LESs) for the period March 2000- February 2001, minus the month of June 2000; Divorce Decree, dated 25 October 1996; UCCI Letter with Reimbursement Check for Overpayment of Premiums, dated 10 June 2002; and UCCI Dental Premium Rate Change Notice, dated 4 February 2002. The evidence confirms the applicant was eligible to be enrolled in the TDP at the single enrollment rate of $7.63 per...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099942C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. On 27 October 1969, the separation authority approved the applicant’s request for discharge and directed that he be issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged with an undesirable discharge on 1 November 1969 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099943C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Even if he had not been recommended for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14, there appears to have been no basis for a medical discharge. Evidence of record shows the same SSN was used at the time of the applicant's enlistment and his discharge from the Army.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099948C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 29 April 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004099948 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his pay grade as...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099950C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. This document indicates that the applicant admitted to having difficulty in the military service and the applicant had numerous criticisms as to the way the Army was run. This DD Form 214 confirms that the applicant was separated under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-208, by reason of unfitness, and received an UD on 31 May 1963.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099951C070208
The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge in 2003, which was past that board's 15-year statute of limitations. The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Shirley L. Powell ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX |CASE ID |AR2004099951 | |SUFFIX | | |RECON | | |DATE BOARDED |20040817 | |TYPE OF DISCHARGE |(UD) | |DATE OF DISCHARGE |19700610 | |DISCHARGE AUTHORITY...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099952C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The application submitted in this case is dated 21 October 2003. A condition of submitting such a request is that the individual concerned must indicate that they have been briefed and understand the consequences of such a request as well as the discharge they might receive.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099953C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 May 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004099053 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of item 12h (Effective Date of Pay Grade) on his DD Form 214 (Certificate of...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099959C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. He further stated that affected individuals would be advised they could seek relief from the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) which could adjust DOR’s for those who were first-time considered and selected for promotion to captain, after having served more than 7 combined MYIG as a lieutenant. In view of the circumstances in this case, the applicant is entitled...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099963C070208
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: JUNE 24, 2004 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2004099963 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The DD Form 214 shows that the applicant entered active duty as a Regular Army Commissioned Officer on 28 May 1994...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099969C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. e. Soldier has an approved retirement. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099972C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant states that his records now show his rank as PFC/E-3, but they should show it as SP4/E-4. The evidence of record shows the applicant's rank as PFC/E-3 and SP4/E- 4 on several different documents prior to being released from active duty.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099973C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record shows that on 14 January 1972, the applicant consulted with counsel and submitted a request for discharge from the service under chapter 10, AR 635-200, for the good of the service. The evidence shows that the applicant was aware, before requesting discharge, that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally Under Other Than Honorable...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099980C070208
Records show the Military Awards Branch advised the Member of Congress by letter, dated 16 May 1997, that the Army Decorations Board, acting on behalf of the Secretary of the Army, had determined the degree of heroism for award of the Silver Star did not merit approval of award of the Distinguished Service Cross or the Medal of Honor. [Soldier's name omitted] distinguished himself while serving as commanding officer, Company D, on a reconnaissance-in-force mission against enemy forces near...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099981C070208
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099992C070208
Therefore, there are no Army records that can be corrected that would allow the repayment of the applicant's loans under the LRP. In doing so, the applicant’s military records may be corrected to show his DA Form 3286-66 was amended to include the sentence “If a student loan is accepted by the official processing you for enlistment as payable under the LRP and the government fails to verify that the student loan accepted actually is eligible under the Higher Education Act of 1965 and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100001C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general discharge. The application submitted in this case is dated 12 August 2003.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100005C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show he was assigned to the 50th Signal Battalion (Airborne Corps) in item 12 (Last Duty Assignment and Major Command). These orders show he was a member of the 206th Signal Company on the date he was awarded this badge.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004100006C070208
The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. Once the Korean War Service Medal has been authorized by the Department of the Air Force, the applicant may apply to the Army Board for Correction of Military Records to add this foreign award to his DD Form 214.