Search Decisions

Decision Text

ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004099963C070208
Original file (2004099963C070208.doc) Auto-classification: Denied





                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


      IN THE CASE OF:


      BOARD DATE:             JUNE 24, 2004
      DOCKET NUMBER:     AR2004099963


      I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record
of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in
the case of the above-named individual.

|     |Mr. Carl W. S. Chun               |     |Director             |
|     |Mr. Luis Almodova                 |     |Analyst              |


  The following members, a quorum, were present:

|     |Mr. James Hise                    |     |Chairperson          |
|     |Mr. Stanley Kelley                |     |Member               |
|     |Mr. Hubert Fry                    |     |Member               |

      The applicant and counsel if any, did not appear before the Board.

      The Board considered the following evidence:

      Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records.

      Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion,
if any).

THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests, in effect, that the time he served as a cadet
at the United States Military Academy be added to his DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

2.  The applicant states, in effect, that he was on active duty as a cadet
at the United States Military Academy from 2 July 1990 to 28 May 1994 when
he graduated and received a commission.  His DD Form 214 does not reflect
his active duty service as a cadet.

3.  The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214; a copy of Orders 161-
001, published by TAEGU Transition Center, 19th TAACOM, dated 10 June 1999;
a statement addressed To Whom It May Concern, dated 21 October 2003; and a
copy of his United States Military Academy Transcript of Academic Record
dated 23 June 1994.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant is requesting correction of an alleged error, which
occurred on 30 June 1999.  The application submitted in this case is dated
29 October 2003.

2.  Title 10, U.S. Code, Section 1552(b), provides that applications for
correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery
of the alleged error or injustice.  This provision of law allows the Army
Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse failure to file
within the 3-year statute of limitation if the ABCMR determines that it
would be in the interest of justice to do so.  In this case, the ABCMR will
conduct a review of the merits of the case to determine if it would be in
the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file.

3.  The statement addressed To Whom It May Concern, dated 21 October 2003,
which the applicant provided with his application, prepared by the Office
of the Dean, United States Military Academy, West Point, New York,
certifies that he was a cadet for the period from 2 July 1990 through his
graduation date, 28 May 1994.

4.  The Transcript of Academic Record dated 23 June 1994, which the
applicant provided, shows that he entered the United States Military
Academy on 2 July 1990 and he graduated on 28 May 1994 with a Bachelor of
Science Degree with a major in History (International/Strategic).

5.  The DD Form 214 shows that the applicant entered active duty as a
Regular Army Commissioned Officer on 28 May 1994 and was honorably
discharged
under the provisions of Army Regulation 600-8-24, paragraph 3-5, for
miscellaneous/general reasons, on 30 June 1999.  On the date he was
discharged, the applicant had completed 5 years, 1 month, and 3 days,
active military service.

6.  Paragraph 010102 D.4. Department of Defense Financial Management
Regulation (DoDFMR), Volume 7A, states that "Service as a cadet or
midshipman at a military academy is always creditable service for an
enlisted member.  See Table 1-1 to determine whether such service is
creditable for commissioned and warrant officers."

7.  Table 1-1, DoDFMR, Volume 7A, Table 1-1, Service As Cadet or Midshipman
– Officers, shows that, When an officer has had service as a cadet or
midshipman in any of the military academies to which appointed and held no
concurrent enlisted and/or Reserve status, then the period involved is not
creditable.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant was a cadet at the United States Military Academy from 2
July 1990 through 28 May 1994.  On his graduation date, the applicant was
commissioned as an officer in the Regular Army.  He served on active duty
until 30 June 1999 when he was discharged from the Army for miscellaneous/
general reasons.

2.  There is no evidence, and the applicant provided none to show, that he
held concurrent enlisted and/or Reserve status at the time he was a cadet
at the United States Military Academy; therefore, this service is not
creditable and the service will not be added to his DD Form 214.

3.  Records show the applicant should have discovered the alleged error or
injustice now under consideration on 30 June 1999; therefore, the time for
the applicant to file a request for correction of any error or injustice
expired on 29 June 2002.  However, the applicant did not file within the 3-
year statute of limitations and has not provided a compelling explanation
or evidence to show that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
failure to timely file in this case.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT RELIEF

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

jh______  hf  ______  sk______  DENY APPLICATION
BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

1.  The Board determined that the evidence presented does not demonstrate
the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board
determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis
for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

2.  As a result, the Board further determined that there is no evidence
provided which shows that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse
the applicant's failure to timely file this application within the 3-year
statute of limitations prescribed by law.  Therefore, there is insufficient
basis to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing or for
correction of the records of the individual concerned.




            ____James Hise_____
                    CHAIRPERSON


                                    INDEX

|CASE ID                 |AR2004099963                            |
|SUFFIX                  |                                        |
|RECON                   |                                        |
|DATE BOARDED            |20040624                                |
|TYPE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DATE OF DISCHARGE       |                                        |
|DISCHARGE AUTHORITY     |                                        |
|DISCHARGE REASON        |                                        |
|BOARD DECISION          |DENY                                    |
|REVIEW AUTHORITY        |                                        |
|ISSUES         1.  303  |129.0100                                |
|2.                      |                                        |
|3.                      |                                        |
|4.                      |                                        |
|5.                      |                                        |
|6.                      |                                        |


Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002071761C070403

    Original file (2002071761C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. Further, that service as a cadet at the USMA under an appointment accepted after 25 June 1956 is not creditable service. Therefore, the Board finds the 3 rd and 4 th year of the applicant’s service as a cadet at the USMA cannot be legally credited as time in service.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050006417C070206

    Original file (20050006417C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his time in service for pay and retirement purposes be recalculated to include the time he spent as a cadet at the U. S. Military Academy (USMA). It states service as a cadet at a military service academy is always creditable service for an enlisted member. If the circumstances in those "precedent" cases had been similar to the applicant's (i.e., enlisted persons who attended the USMA during their initial enlistment, graduated from the USMA, served only...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002078008C070215

    Original file (2002078008C070215.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein. In accordance with the DODFMR, Volume 7B, Chapter 1, Table 1-5 service as a cadet or midshipman is creditable for basic pay purposes if you concurrently held an enlisted status in the Army on or after January 1, 1953. Other creditable service was added to the applicant’s record as basic pay.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2013 | 20130001519

    Original file (20130001519.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 to show he completed Air Assault School during the period he was a cadet. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. The evidence of record shows the applicant entered USMA as a cadet on 28 June 1989 and graduated on 29 May 1993.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100000688

    Original file (20100000688.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant contends that his request should be reconsidered in that his service at the USMA was active duty service authorized for inclusion in item 12c of his DD Form 214 because the U.S. Code states that the RA consists of persons whose continuous service on active duty in both peace and war includes cadets of the USMA. The evidence of record shows that: a. the U.S. Code provides that service as a cadet or midshipman may not be credited to any commissioned officer of the Army; b. the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.TXT) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050001028C070206

    Original file (20050001028C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant provides his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) for the period ending 28 June 1969; his DA Form 71 (Oath of Office – Military Personnel); a DAPC-PS Form 143 (Computation of Officer's Service); a DA Form 4187 (Personnel Action) dated 13 September 1999; an enlistment contract dated 29 June 1966; his DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record); his DA Form 66 (Officer Qualification Record); a DA Form 7301-R (Officer Service Computation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140019479

    Original file (20140019479.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests her time spent at the United States Military Academy (USMA) be added to her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) with a separation date of 16 October 2001. The applicant provides: * DD Form 214 * transcripts from the USMA CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Army Regulation 635-5 provides for entries on the DD Form 214 for a Soldier who is released in a cadet status prior to graduating from the USMA.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080010196

    Original file (20080010196.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Naval Academy, dated 7 May 2007; his AHRC [Army Human Resources Command] Form 606-E (Statement of Service with Retirement Points); his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty); his retirement Orders S28-19, dated 9 February 1984; and a supplemental letter, dated 23 October 2008. The applicant was released from active duty on 30 June 1984 after completing 24 years and 26 days of total active military service. It states that service as a cadet at a military service...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2008 | 20080009708

    Original file (20080009708.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant is confusing the service (i.e., 26 years, 4 months, and 12 days as shown on his corrected Chronological Statement of Retirement Points) he would have been credited with had he retired with an enlisted Reserve retirement at age 60 with the service he was eligible to be credited with as a commissioned officer who retired from active duty. For example, had the applicant retired with an enlisted Reserve retirement or even with an enlisted active duty retirement, all of his service...