AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016555
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 24 July 1996, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for having received three Article 15's and numerous counseling statements, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016556
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 15 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for operating a vehicle with a suspended license (051005) and for failure to report three times (051003, 051004, 051005) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016562
The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service. The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 4 December 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016564
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016568
On 13 September 1994, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016569
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-1b, states no Soldier will be awarded a character of service under honorable conditions under this chapter unless the Soldier is notified of the specific factors in her service record that warrants such a characterization, using the notification procedure. Board Discussion, Determination, and...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016571
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 September 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct for receiving numerous counseling statements (disobeying a commissioned officer, failure to report, and false official statements x 4) for which he received a Field Grade Article 15 on 16 June 2006; he was derelict in the performance of his duties...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016573
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016574
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016576
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 18 July 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for illegal use of a controlled substance (020304-020404) and for having been found guilty by a General Court Martial (010709) for larceny of computer equipment and for mailing stolen property, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 20 July 2002, the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016707
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 December 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016750
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived his right to an admininstrative separation board contingent upon receiving a general, under honorable condition discharge, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel,...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016752
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 15 September 2004, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst noted that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service to include his combat service, mitigated the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016756
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 6 June 2002, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for wrongfully using marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. ...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016773
On 24 October 2005, the separation authority approved the discharge with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016775
Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of JFW (i.e., failure to meet procurement medical fitness standards), with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of 3. The characterization of service for soldiers separated under this provision of regulation will normally be honorable, but will be uncharacterized if the soldier is in an entry-level status. The analyst determined that no such unusual circumstances were present in the applicant's record and his service did not warrant an...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016788
While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst determined that the circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge as established by his two immediate commanders' recommendations for retention mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016793
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 3 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct and commission of a serious offense for receiving a Field Grade Article 15 on (030204) and (040907) for wrongfully using marijuana; Battery Grade Article 15 on (041015) for multiple charges of failure to report; Field Grade Article 15 on (041216) for...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016801
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a genera, under honorable conditions discharge. On 3 January 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of genera, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016802
On 3 November 1992, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Accordingly, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to general, under honorable conditions. Board Decision The discharge was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The characterization of service was: Proper Improper Equitable Inequitable The narrative reasons were: Equitable...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016807
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 February 2005, the applicant was diagnosed by competent medical authority with a disorder of Axis I: Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood; Axis II: Personality Disorder Not Otherwise Specified with Cluster B Traits. The unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of AR 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-13, by reason of personality disorder, diagnosed by a...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016808
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016809
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions discharge. Furthermore, the analyst noted the applicant issue that his offenses were minor and isolated.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016814
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017133
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 11, AR 635-200, by reason of entry level performance and conduct with an uncharacterized separation of service. Army Regulation 635-200 also provides, except in cases of serious misconduct, that a soldier's service will be uncharacterized when his separation is initiated while the soldier is in entry level status. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017134
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 23 November 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for having received a Field Grade Article 15 for wrongful use of cocaine, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 23 November 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017135
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 3 June 1992, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for having received four Article 15's, for failure to pay debts, and for drug abuse, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017136
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 24 December 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 31 December 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions discharge. ...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017266
Current ENL Service: 0 Yrs, 10 Mos, 16 Days ????? The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, full relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable and a change to the narrative reason for separation to Secretarial Authority is recommended to the Board.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017299
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Original Character of Discharge Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 000503 Discharge Received: Date: 000920 Chapter: 10 AR: 635-200 Reason: In Lieu of Trial by Court-Martial RE: SPD: KFS Unit/Location: 403rd Transportation Company, Fort Bragg, NC Time Lost: Absent without leave for a total of 35 days (990706-990809). Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017302
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 05 Mos, 28 Days ????? The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individuals admission of guilt. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 15 October 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017526
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 04 Mos, 00 Days ????? The senior intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 12 January 2005, the separation authority approved the administrative separation board waiver and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060017784
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 18 April 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-pattern of misconduct (violated Article 128 (Assault) on two separate occasions), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 1 June 2006, the separation authority directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2003-00281
MD 20762-1002 I (EF-V2) P r e v i o u s edition will be u s e d AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2003-00281 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the reason and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. The records indicated the applicant received an Article 15 and a Vacation for misconduct. In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00052
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) .--------------------. If she can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising her right to make a personal appearance before the Board. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH SRA) 1.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00081
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD 7 GRADE 1 AB I I . CONCLUSIONS: The Discharge Review Board concluded that the applicant's punitive discharge by Special Court-Martial is appropriate undcr the facts and circumstances of this case and there is insufficient basis, as an act of clemency, for change of discharge. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) MISSING MEDICAL RECORDS 1.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00087
Although these disciplinary actions were not basis for applicant's discharge the Board took these into account when reviewing the applicant's service record. 'The applicant's record supports the fact that the applicant failed to progress satisfactorily in her 5-level upgrade training, therefore the Board concluded that the characterization and reason of the discharge received by the applicant to be appropriate. You show a lack in progress on your upgrade training, as evidenced by AF Form...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00103
IAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (I.AST, FIRST M1DDI.E INITIAL) GRADE AFSNISSAN AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD PERSONAL APPEARANCE I 1 X I RECORD REVIEW I L..-....-....-..-. If he can provide additional documented information to substantiate an issue, the applicant should consider exercising his right to make a personal appearance before the Board. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00144
L AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD - . TX 781504712 SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COIlNClL ALR FORCE DJSCHARCE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND D R EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, ~ ~ ' 2 0 7 6 2 - 7 0 0 2 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00144 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable. Copies of the documents to be forwarded to the separation...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00199
Applicant's Issues. c. You did, at or near Sheppard AFB TX, on or about 23 Jun 03, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: physical conditioning. For t h s misconduct and subparagraph "g" below you received an LOR on 3 Jun 03. g. You did, at or near Sheppard AFB TX, on or about 3 Jun 03, without authority, fail to go at the time prescribed to your appointed place of duty, to wit: morning formation.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00272
3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 10762.7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2004-00272 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change tl~c reasoil and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code. Appeals for Honorable Discharge, and to Change the RE Code, Reason and Authority for Discharge. (Change Discharge to Honorable, and Change the RE Code,...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00283
ee ANDORSEMENT DATE: 1262006 a nna i en a pene s SAF/MRBR SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 550.C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7002 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used CASE NUMBER AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE FD-2004-00283 GENERAL: The applicant appeals for an upgrade of his discharge to honorable. Therefore, with the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00459
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD -- -'---r a n i n n # I? In addition, because the commander recommended the applicant's separation with a general discharge, the applicant was not a noncommissioned officer, and the applicant had not served more than six years, he had no discharge board entitlement. (Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO B R I E F .
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2004-00489
This is Government Card Services knows this as mentioned in the I should have been notified of all punitive UCMJ action being considered against me IAW FM 27-1, FM 2701, and Article 1 3 8 ~ . You are eligible for an administrative discharge board. Information is provided at Attachment 7. regarding an administrative discharge board 5.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00042
ISSUE: Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct--Commission of a Serious Offense Issue 1 : Applicant contends that he was young and immature. Attachment: Examiner's Brief DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD (Former AB) (HGH AlC) 1. I have been out of the United States Air Force for roughly thirteen years, but not a day goes by that I do not think about the good memories, and childish mistakes that I made.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00052
(Change Discharge to Honorable) ISSUES ATTACHED TO BRIEF. Can p u please consider upgrading his discharge status to a General Discharge? In addition to military counsel, you have the right to consult civilian counsel at your own expense.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00069
You, on or about 19 April 2004, failed to comply with a medical waiver in violation of Article 92, as evidenced by Letter of Reprimand, dated 28 April 2004. c. You, on or about 28 April 2004, were disorderly in violation of Article 134, as evidenced by AF Form 3070, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment Proceedings, dated 19 May 2004. e. You, on or about 16 July 2004, were disorderly violation of Article 134, as ,evidenced by AF Form 174, Record of Individual Counseling, dated 21 July 2004. d....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00083
- - - - AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAI.) SIJITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742 AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00 INDORSEMENT w DATE: 1 If 16J2006 FROM: SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD 1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING,3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7w2 I (EF-V2) Previous edition will be used 1 1 1 I 1 I I AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE CASE NUMBER FD-2005-00083 GENERAL:...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00086
AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) .--------------------------------- :....-..-....-..-..---------------' TYPE HON PERSONAL APPEARANCE X NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION GRADE AMN AFSNISSAN I - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ...............: RECORD REVIEW ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION O F COUNSEL YES No X I I MEMBER SITTING HON I VOTE OF THE BOARD GEN UOTHC I OTHER I DENY 1 I I 1 I I ISSUES A94.05 I INDEX NUMBER A67.50 - - -...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00106
The applicant consulted legal counsel and this was not an issue the applicant made at the time of her discharge. The Board concluded the discharge was appropriate for the reasons which were the basis for this case and that the characterization of the applicant's discharge was appropriate due to the misconduct. TYPE OF REVIEW REQUESTED (X one) v 1 CONDUCT A RECORD REVIEW OF MY DISCHARGE BASED ON MY MILITARY PERSONNEL FILE AND ANY ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION " [ SUBMITTED BY ME.