Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016569
Original file (AR20060016569.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
Application Receipt Date: 061130	

Prior Review    Prior Review Date: None

I.  Applicant Request
Request:  Upgrade     Reason Change     RE Code Change    

Issues: See enclosed D Form 293 submitted by the applicant.

II.  Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?  
Yes    No        Tender Offer:        

See Attachments:  Legal     Medical     Minority Opinion     Exhibits 

III.  Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge:    Date: 041022
Discharge Received:     Date: 050204   
Chapter: 5-8    AR: 635-200
Reason: Parenthood
RE:     SPD: JDG
Unit/Location: HHC, 2-327 IN, Fort Campbell, KY 

Time Lost: None

Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None

Counseling Records Available: Yes    No 

IV.  Soldier's Overall Record
DOB:  730604  
Current ENL Date: 010815    Current ENL Term: 4 Years       
Current ENL Service: 03  Yrs, 05 Mos, 20 Days      
Total Service:  13  Yrs, 02 Mos, 23 Days      
Previous Discharges: RA-911112-950404/HD
                                      RA-950405-971020/HD
                                      RA-971021-990516/HD
                                      RA-990517-000531/HD
                                      RA-000601-010814/HD
Highest Grade: E5
Performance Ratings Available: Yes    No 
MOS: 92A10 Automated Logistics Spec   GT: 91   EDU: HS Grad   Overseas: Germany/Korea/Kosovo   Combat: Kuwait/Iraq (030228-040220)
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM-3, AGCM-3, NDSM-2, KCM, GWOTEM, GWOTSM, KDSM, NCOPDR, NM (Koso), ASR, OSR-2 
V.  Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record: 
Current Address: 
Post Service Accomplishments: The applicant states he is enrolled in college and is employed as an Army contractor for Sikorsky Support Services, Inc at Fort Benning, GA.

VI.  Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation

      a.  Facts and Circumstances:
      The evidence of record shows that on 22 October 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of involuntary separation due to parenthood; for failure to provide an adequate family care plan, with an honorable discharge.  He was advised of his rights.  The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf.  The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts.  The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge.  The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. 

      b.  Legal Basis for Separation:  
      Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Paragraph 5-8 provides that a soldier may be separated when parental obligations interfere with fulfillment of military responsibilities.  Specific reasons for separation because of parenthood include inability to perform prescribed duties satisfactorily, repeated absenteeism, late for work, inability to participate in field training exercises or perform special duties such as CQ and Staff Duty NCO, and non-availability for worldwide assignment or deployment according to the needs of the Army.  Unless reason for separation requires a specific characterization, a Soldier being separated for the convenience of the government will be awarded a character of service of honorable, under honorable conditions or an uncharacterized description of service if in entry-level status.

      c.  Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:  
      After a careful review of all the applicant's military records for the period of enlistment under review and the issues he submitted, the analyst determined that the characterization of service was improper.  Army Regulation 635-200, Chapter 5, paragraph 5-1b, states no Soldier will be awarded a character of service under honorable conditions under this chapter unless the Soldier is notified of the specific factors in her service record that warrants such a characterization, using the notification procedure.  In view of the aforementioned, the analyst recommends to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the applicant's characterization of service to fully honorable.  However, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable. 

VII.  Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing 

Type of Hearing: 			Date: 21 December 2007              
Location: Washington, DC

Did the Applicant Testify?  Yes     No  

Counsel: NA

Witnesses/Observers: NA 

Exhibits Submitted: NA




VIII.  Board Decision
The discharge was:			Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The characterization of service was:   Proper	 	Improper	
				                 	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

The narrative reasons were: 	       	Equitable	 	Inequitable	

DRB voting record:  		      Change 5    No change 0   - Character
		 			      Change 0    No change 5   - Reason
					      (Board member names available upon request)

IX.  Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was improper.  Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of the characterization of service to fully honorable.  However, the Board determined that the reason for discharge was both proper and equitable, and voted not to change it.

Case report reviewed and verified by: Mr. Kenneth McFarley, Examiner									        
X.  Board Action Directed
No Change 
Issue a new DD Form 214  
Change Characterization to:    
Change Reason to: None
Other: NA
RE Code:  
Grade Restoration:   No   Yes  Grade: None

XI.  Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority: 

MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board

Official: 


CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON			DATE:      
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE

Case Number AR20060016569

Applicant Name:  Mr.        
______________________________________________________________________


Page 1 of 5 pages

Similar Decisions

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008231

    Original file (AR20060008231.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 03Mos, 26Days ????? Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 4 May 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008220

    Original file (AR20060008220.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 23 December 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of involuntary separation due to parenthood (in addition to having been AWOL from 14-17 March 2003, failure to be at her appointed place of duty on two occasions and for making a false statement regarding her marital status) with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060009782

    Original file (AR20060009782.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s available military records during the period of enlistment under review, and the issues he submitted, the analyst recommends that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060007409

    Original file (AR20060007409.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Current ENL Service: 00 Yrs, 09Mos, 04Days ????? His DD Form 214 indicates that he was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: MARY E. SHAW DATE: 2 April 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060013007

    Original file (AR20060013007.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See applicant's attached DD Form 293. Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was released from active duty under the provisions of Chapter 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with a general, under honorable conditions characterization of service. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 2...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070010411

    Original file (AR20070010411.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged from active duty under the provisions of Paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service. The evidence of record shows the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Paragraph 5-8, AR 635-200, by reason of parenthood, with an honorable characterization of service, a Separation Code of JDG (i.e., parenthood), and a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "3." The narrative reason specified by...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080000253

    Original file (AR20080000253.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant Name: ????? The applicant waived her right to consult with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant’s military records, and the independent evidence she submitted, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant’s characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable.

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060014943

    Original file (AR20060014943.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant waived legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in her own behalf. On 27 February 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080014067

    Original file (AR20080014067.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant Name: ????? Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst’s recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the applicant was not properly notified as to the reasons why he would not get an honorable discharge as specified in paragraph 5-1b, AR 635-200. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form...

  • ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080008015

    Original file (AR20080008015.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in her own behalf. No soldier will be awarded a characterization of service under honorable conditions under this chapter unless the soldier is notified of the specific factors in her service record that warrant such a characterization, using the notification procedure. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...