AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015152
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. The applicant, as a NCO, had the duty to support and abide by the Army's drug policies. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE: 14 December 2007 Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015157
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015159
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 01 May 1995, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for failure to report, disobeying a lawful regulation, writing bad checks, failure to obey lawful orders and indebtedness, with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 5 May 1995, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015160
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 March 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-Commission of a Serious Offense for having been convicted by a Summary Court Martial for wrongfully use of marijuana X2, with a general, under honorable condition discharge. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015161
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 25 June 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable condition discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Accordingly, the Board voted to change the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015162
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015163
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: The applicant requests an upgrade in his discharge so that he would be eligible to re-enlist, and properly serve his country. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015164
On 27 August 2003, the separation authority approved the discharge with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015167
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined that the reason for discharge and the characterization...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015169
Application Receipt Date: 061026 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. On 16 July 2001 the applicant consulted with legal counsel and voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, contingent upon his receiving a characterization of service of no less favorable than honorable. On 24 September 2001, the separation authority approved the recommendation of the administrative separation board and directed that the applicant be discharged with a...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015171
Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the applicant's overall length and quality of his service to include his combat service and as a result it is inequitable. Board Action Directed No Change Issue a new DD Form 214 Change...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015172
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 18 November 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015173
After a thorough review of the applicant's record and the issue he submitted, the analyst found no cause for clemency and therefore recommend to the Board no clemency. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and voted to deny relief. Certification...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015176
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongfully using marijuana (041018-041218), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. While the applicant's...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015179
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 16-8, AR 635-200, by reason of reduction in force, with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 provides the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015303
Her DD Form 214 indicates that she was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 5-13, AR 635-200 by reason of personality disorder, with an honorable discharge. The narrative reason specified by Army Regulations for a discharge under this paragraph is "Personality Disorder", and the separation code is "JFX." Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE:...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015406
Application Receipt Date: 061031 Prior Review Prior Review Date: None I. Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 31 October 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 12-1, AR135-178, and paragraph 8-26f, NGR 600-200, by reason of misconduct-acts or patterns of misconduct for self-indentifying to the use of THC (marijuana) on (051019) , with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. ...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015407
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 5 March 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015408
An enlisted member separated for misconduct which includes unsatisfactory participation will normally be furnished a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions, but characterization as general, under honorable conditions may be warranted under the guidelines in chapter 2, section III in accordance with Army Regulation 135-178. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's available military records for the period...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015409
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 2 April 1992, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for receiving two Field Grade article 15s for wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. ...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015412
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable b. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015421
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015422
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. The request may be submitted at any time after charges have been preferred and must include the individual's admission of guilt. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015429
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 21 July 1998, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015431
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. On 24 March 2003, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015432
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. It is also noted that the characterization of service for this type of discharge is normally under other than honorable conditions and that the applicant was aware of that prior to requesting discharge. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE:...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015433
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015438
Applicant Request Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change Issues: See DD 293 and attached documents submitted by the applicant. Furthermore, the DD Form 214 shows a Separation Code of KFS (i.e., for the good of the service-in lieu of court-martial) with a reentry eligibility (RE) code of "4." The applicable Army regulation states that there are circumstances in which the conduct or performance of duty reflected by a single incident provides the basis for a characterization.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015439
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015440
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 10 March 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense for illegal use of marijuana (041204 and 050103), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015443
Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation a. His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a characterization of service of fully honorable. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 9, AR 635-200, by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure, with a characterization of service of fully honorable.
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015444
On 20 December 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the discharge was both proper and equitable and...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015459
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 16 March 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for patterns of misconduct for receiving three Field Grade Art 15s, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 13 April 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015460
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 07 December 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct - for receiving a field grade article 15 for disrespect to a NCO as well as numerous counseling statements highlighting a lack of self discipline which has resulted in an overall disruptive influence to the unit, with a general discharge. The intermediate commander...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015462
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015483
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015486
His DD Form 214 indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c(1) by reason of misconduct, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. That DD Form 214 indicates that the applicant was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, paragraph 12c by reason of misconduct-commission of a serious offense, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Certification...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015487
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 20 January 2004, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 7, AR 635-200, by reason of fraudulent entry, by having a minor dependant, which she had custody of by court order, the applicant arranged for temporary care of the child with the intent to regain custody at her duty station, with an general, under honorable conditions discharge. The intermediate commander...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015488
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 19 August 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of patterns of misconduct-for two Article 15s (990929, 990712) and numerous other negative counseling statements, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015491
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale: After a careful review of all the applicant's military records, and the independent evidence he submitted, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015521
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 21 March 1997, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for wrongful use of marijuana, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 10 April 1997, the separation authority...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015663
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. On 17 July 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015807
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 08 April 2003, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongfully using marijuana and being arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol (020718), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. On 16 April 2003, the applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action,...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015809
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 3 May 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for wrongfully using cocaine with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. On 2 June 2005, the separation authority waived...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015810
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 31 May 2005, after careful consideration of medical records, laboratory findings, and medical examinations, the Physical Evaluation Board (EPSB) found that the applicant was medically unfit for enlistment in accordance with current medical fitness standards and in the opinion of the evaluating physicians the conditions(s) existed prior to service. Army Regulation 635-200 states that a soldier is in an entry-level status if the...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015811
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived his right to an administrative separation board, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. On 10 January 2005, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honor conditions. Certification Signature and Date Approval Authority: MARK E. COLLINS Colonel, U.S....
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015814
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for a discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015817
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 28 September 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct commission of a serious offense for wrongful use of marijuana (050503-050602), with an honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015818
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 5 May 1994, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct-for conviction by a civil court, with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. On 29 June 1994, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015820
Legal Basis for Separation: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Therefore, the analyst determined the reason for discharge and the characterization of service were both proper and equitable and recommends to the Board to deny relief. Yes No Counsel: Witnesses/Observers: Exhibits Submitted: VIII.