Application Receipt Date: 061103
Prior Review Prior Review Date: None
I. Applicant Request
Request: Upgrade Reason Change RE Code Change
Issues: See enclosed DD Form 293 submitted by the Applicant
II. Were Proper Discharge and Separation Authority procedures followed?
Yes No Tender Offer:
See Attachments: Legal Medical Minority Opinion Exhibits
III. Original Character of Discharge
Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 060124
Discharge Received: Date: 060831
Chapter: 14-12B AR: 635-200
Reason: Pattern of misconduct
RE: SPD: JKA
Unit/Location: Illinois Army National Guard Recruiting and Retention Command, Springfield, IL
Time Lost: None
Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 051007, violated a lawful general regulation and provisions of the Privacy Act of 1974, by wrongfully gaining access to a copy of a physical exam (050514-050515), letter of admonishment filed in his file for 6 months (FG).
Court-Martials (Charges/Dates/Punishment): None
Counseling Records Available: Yes No
IV. Soldier's Overall Record
DOB: 831110
Current ENL Date: 040930 Current ENL Term: 03 Years
Current ENL Service: 01 Yrs, 11Mos, 01Days
Total Service: 05 Yrs, 8Mos, 02Days
Previous Discharges: USAR 001229-020530/NA
ADT 020531-020809/UNC
USAR 020810-040705/NA
ARNG 040706-040929/NA
Highest Grade: E-5
Performance Ratings Available: Yes No
MOS: 42A24 Human Resources Spec GT: 115 EDU: HS Grad Overseas: None Combat: None
Decorations/Awards: ARCOM, AAM, ARCAM, NDSM-2, GWOTSM, ASR, Military Outstanding Volunteer Service Medal
V. Post-Discharge Activity
Home of Record:
Current Address:
Post Service Accomplishments: None listed.
VI. Facts, Circumstances, and Legal Basis for Separation
a. Facts and Circumstances:
Evidence of record shows that on 24 January 2006, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for failure to disclose medical condition prior to entry on AGR; failure to disclose medical condition during periodic physical exam; and receiving a Field Grade Art 15 for violation of a lawful general regulation, with a general discharge. He was advised of his rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did submit a statement in his own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 12 September 2006, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of Under Honorable Conditions.
b. Legal Basis for Separation:
Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, and commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted.
c. Response to Issues, Recommendation and Rationale:
After a careful review of all the applicant's military records, and the independent evidence he submitted, the analyst recommends to the Board that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. This recommendation was made after full consideration of his faithful and honorable service, as well as his record of misconduct. The evidence in this case supports a conclusion that the applicant's characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst determined that the overall length and quality of the applicant's service mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Accordingly, the analyst recommends that the applicant's characterization of service be upgraded to fully honorable. However, the analyst found that the reason for discharge was fully supported by the record and therefore, remains both proper and equitable.
VII. Summary of Army Discharge Review Board Hearing
Type of Hearing: Date:
Location: Washington Dc
Did the Applicant Testify? Yes No
Counsel: NA
Witnesses/Observers: NA
Exhibits Submitted: NA
VIII. Board Decision
The discharge was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The characterization of service was: Proper Improper
Equitable Inequitable
The narrative reasons were: Equitable Inequitable
DRB voting record: Change No change - Character
Change No change - Reason
(Board member names available upon request)
IX. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation
Case report reviewed and verified by: Timon M. Oujiri, Examiner
X. Board Action Directed
No Change
Issue a new DD Form 214
Change Characterization to:
Change Reason to:
Other:
RE Code:
Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade:
XI. Certification Signature and Date
Approval Authority:
MARK E. COLLINS
Colonel, U.S. Army
President, Army Discharge Review Board
Official:
CHRISTINE U. MARTINSON DATE:
Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army
Chief, Secretary Recorder
ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE
Case Number AR20060015491
Applicant Name: Mr.
______________________________________________________________________
Page 1 of 4 pages
ARMY | DRB | CY2008 | AR20080009676
Applicant Name: ????? On 21 November 2007, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Action Directed President, Army Discharge Review Board Issue a new DD Form 214 Change Characterization to: Change Reason to: NA Other: NA RE Code: Grade Restoration: No Yes Grade: NA ARMY DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD - CASE REPORT AND DIRECTIVE Case Number...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016214
The separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh based on the overall...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060008183
The intermediate commander reviewed the proposed discharge action and recommended approval of the separation action with a honorable discharge. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was too harsh, and as a result it is inequitable. Certification Signature...
ARMY | DRB | CY2012 | AR20120009794
Applicant Name: ????? Discharge Under Review Unit CDR Recommended Discharge: Date: 091105 Discharge Received: Date: 100119 Chapter: 14-12c AR: 635-200 Reason: Misconduct (Serious Offense) RE: SPD: JKQ Unit/Location: Fort Huachuca, AZ Time Lost: None Article 15s (Charges/Dates/Punishment): 090811, failing to obey a lawful order and disrespect to an NCO, reduction from E-3 to E-1, extra duty for 45 days, restriction for 45 days, and an oral reprimand (FG). The applicant was discharged under...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060015176
Facts and Circumstances: Evidence of record shows that on 14 February 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for wrongfully using marijuana (041018-041218), with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. While the applicant's...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013567
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, unconditionally waived her right to an administrative separation board contingent upon receiving a general discharge, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. On 10 March 2004, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general under honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination,...
AF | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060016788
While the applicant's misconduct is not condoned, the analyst determined that the circumstances surrounding the applicant's discharge as established by his two immediate commanders' recommendations for retention mitigated the discrediting entries in his service record. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicant's record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analyst's recommendation and rationale, the...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011715
The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board, and did not submit a statement in his own behalf. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined that the characterization of service was...
ARMY | DRB | CY2006 | AR20060011666
Current ENL Service: 03 Yrs, 08 Mos, 28 Days ????? On 30 January 1996, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. Board Discussion, Determination, and Recommendation After carefully examining the applicants record of service during the period of enlistment under review and considering the analysts recommendation and rationale, the Board determined...
ARMY | DRB | CY2007 | AR20070013016
Facts and Circumstances: The evidence of record shows that on 14 July 2005, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter 14, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct for the wrongful use of cocaine (050411-050418), with a general under honorable conditions discharge. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in his own behalf. Accordingly, the analyst...