AF | BCMR | CY2011 | 2009-03900
On 22 Jan 10, AFPC/DPAPP verified the applicant’s Foreign Service in Taiwan from 24 Feb 67 through 19 Mar 68 for a total of 1 year and 26 days. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Apr 10, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | 2010-00525
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial, stating that a review of the applicant’s military personnel records did not reflect that he served in Vietnam. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Aug 10, for review and comment...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | 2010-00761
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served temporary duty (TDY) in Thailand in 1963, and his records do not reflect any Foreign Service. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 Aug 10, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 00038 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00038 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO __________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect his Vietnam service. In his latest request, dated 28 Oct 11, the applicant submits a copy of his travel orders validated and stamped by the Customs 277th Air Police Squadron at Tan Son Nhut Airbase,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 00147
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00147 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to show award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM). In the original request, the applicant contended the AFCM was awarded to him on 29 Aug 67 but was not included on his DD Form 214. The facts and opinions stated...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 00202
Accordingly, we find the evidence presented sufficient to correct the record to show that on 31 Oct 99, (the date he completed 20 years of satisfactory service) the service member elected former spouse coverage under the RCSBP based on full retired pay, naming the APPLICANT as the former spouse beneficiary. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the SERVICE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 00249 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00249 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be upgraded. This is her second request, for the first request was denied just prior to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 00913
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00913 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to update his general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01111
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01111 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 20 percent disability rating for medical separation due to diabetes mellitus be changed to a 40 percent disability rating and he be given a medical retirement. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01180
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01180 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel record, the applicant was discharged for not making satisfactory progress in a required training program. We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01327
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOE recommends the applicants request for restoration of his rank to airman first class be time barred. DPSOE states the application was not filed within the three-year limitation imposed by Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, paragraph 3.5, 1 Mar 96. Regarding his request for upgrade of his discharge, although the applicant states...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01392
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01392 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01500
He was approved for Stop Loss payments from Apr 02 to 1 Oct 02 (his promotion date). On the date he was promoted, his AFSC was still on Stop Loss and he could not retire. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01509
In support of his request, the applicant submits copies of Special Order (SO) GB-130, a Unit Awards letter, his DD Form 214 and page two of his AF Form 1712, Uniform Military Personnel Record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01519
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01519 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry code (RE) of 4I (Serving on Control Roster) and his separation code (SPD) of JFT (Physical Standards) be changed to waiverable codes. A medical board determined he was fit for service; however, he was discharged for failing his physical...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01529
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01529 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01546
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01546 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. DPSOS notes had the Air Force known of the applicants condition at the time of her enlistment, she would have been denied entry in military service. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01604
In this respect, we note the AFCM certificate and citation, provided by the applicant, indicates the decoration was awarded to him on 1 Jul 1969 for meritorious service. Although the applicant has not provided a copy of the order awarding the AFCM, we find the documentation the applicant has provided sufficient to resolve any doubt in his favor. Therefore, we recommend his record be corrected as indicated below _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01653
On 3 Dec 09, the applicant requested a waiver to extend his MSD from 1 Mar 10 to 9 Aug 10, to allow him to complete a 2009 Retirement/Retention (R/R) year, be properly credited for 18 years of service and entry into retirement sanctuary. RGM/CC states service members must complete a minimum requirement of 50 points per R/R year to obtain retirement credit for a satisfactory year. Finally, the applicants counsel states that the applicant actually performed 18 years of service, yet was not...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01653 2
Counsel contends that the Air Force erred by failing to display the applicants national security clearance during the first half of Fiscal Year (FY) 2006, which prevented him from performing reserve duty and acquiring the 50 points required for a good year of service. In support of his request for reconsideration, the applicant secured a statement from his former military supervisor, who was personally aware of his security clearance issues and the unique time requirements for reservists...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01683
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01683 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of this application, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. Having found no...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01725
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01725 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited for pay and points for Unit Training Assemblies (UTAs) he completed during the months of Feb, Mar, Apr, and May 2008. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01777
Although the discharge was properly processed according to the applicable regulation, the applicant's discharge record indicates his discharge was based solely on DADT or a similar policy; however, there were aggravating factors. In a memorandum, dated 20 Sep 2011, the Under Secretary of Defense published guidance that Service Discharge Review Boards should normally grant requests to change the narrative reason for discharge, separation code, re-characterize the discharge to Honorable,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01785
We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01915
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01915 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO CONGRESSIONAL INTEREST: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 4L (separated commissioning program) be changed to RE-12 (recommended for reenlistment). Examiners Note: Code RE-12 is not an Air Force reenlistment eligibility code. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02151
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 4 Aug 09, he elected to transfer 18 months of his GI Bill eligibility to his dependents via the Veterans Affairs (VA) website. He did not provide evidence he submitted an application on or about 4 Aug 09. A1PA states the applicant has not provided evidence he intended to transfer benefits to his dependent children while on active duty.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02256
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02256 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be granted an additional increase of 10 percent in retirement pay due to extraordinary heroism in connection with the Bronze Star Medal with Valor (BSM w/V). AFI 36-3203, Service Retirements, paragraph 3.8.1, states since extraordinary heroism is...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02527
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOE reviewed this application and recommends the request be time barred or denied based on its merits. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 30 Sep 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant for review and comment within 30 days. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02656
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02656 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Notwithstanding the above, sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice regarding the applicants request that he be provided an honorable discharge certificate for his initial period...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02660
The complete AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicants counsel states there is no evidence regarding DPSIDs claim that the TACON commander relinquished control to the ADCON commander to perform supervisory duties over the applicant. According to AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction Of Military Records, paragraph 4.1., an applicant has the burden of providing...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 02663
The PUC was presented to his unit for participation in the missile crisis. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 11 Sep 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. _______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03019
The applicant requests his SS be upgraded to the MOH; however, the letter provided requests the applicant be reconsidered for the MOH. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In a letter dated 10 Jan 14, the applicant states his Form 5, Pilot Individual Flight Record, shows he flew three combat missions on 25 Jun 64. Exhibit N. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Jun 14, w/atchs.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03032
Further, it must be noted that the service disability boards must rate disabilities based on the individual's condition at the time of evaluation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The evidence indicates at the time of the IPEB the applicant had not received a diagnosis for a personality disorder. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03202
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID verified foreign service in Darmstadt, Germany, from 7 March 1963 to 15 January 1965 and Peshawar, Pakistan from 27 March 1965 to 8 April 1966. The DPAPP complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03220
AFBCMR BC-2011-03220 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03236
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. At no time has anyone from the Air Force or the Air National Guard ever stated what that change was. While the Board notes the applicants contention that there was no significant change in his medical condition in Dec 10 and his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03307
Personnel were advised that submitting a request to the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records would restore their leave. IAW AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records, the applicant has the burden of providing sufficient evidence of material error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Dec 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03524
The applicant's initial DD Form 4 reflects Mentor, Minnesota as the city/state in which he lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout his military records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03584
He still felt pain in his left knee and the cool weather seemed to intensify the pain level. RMG/CC states, the applicants records indicate he was eligible for promotion with a 1 Jan 2011 effective date. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03833
He notes that almost seven years of his service was completed during the Post 9/11 era and he should be afforded the entitlement. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 11. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 28 Nov 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03890
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for award of the BSM w/1OLC, PH w/3OLCs, CIB, PUC w/2OLCs, PRPUC, APCM and Gold Star Lapel Ribbon On 5 Dec 13, the PH Review Board reviewed and approved the applicants request that his uncle be awarded the PH. While we have no documentary evidence that confirms, with any certainty, what period the former member was assigned to the 3rd...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04047
The applicant contends that she should be eligible for promotion consideration by a Special Selection Board based on precedent that has been established in similar cases decided by this Board in BC-1996- 01097 and the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) in AR20090011111 and AR20100025905. Although the applicant was eliminated from medical school on 25 Jun 10, she remained assigned to USUHS on active duty in a student status until such time as she was discharged. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04145 3
Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) case, Docket Number BC-2002- 02848 had similar facts wherein the PAFSC was not correct and negatively impacted the officer's promotion. The applicant also asserts, in essence, that based on the error with his PAFSC that his appeal is similar to AFBCMR BC-2002-02848 and that relief is warranted using the same rationale for an SSB. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04169
The applicant was awarded the DFC for extraordinary achievement on 5 Apr 71. The DFC may be awarded to any person who, after 6 Apr 17, while serving in any capacity with the US Armed Forces, distinguished themselves by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in aerial flight. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04310 2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2011-04310 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reserve retirement be changed to a disability retirement. The applicant disagreed with the IPEB decision; however there is no evidence to show she sought further appellate review of the IPEB findings and recommended disposition. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04726 2
The former service member also provided a statement requesting his former spouse be deemed his beneficiary under the SBP (Exhibit J). However, the service member, his current spouse, and the former spouse (applicant) have all provided notarized statements that are sufficient for us to conclude that there is not a competing beneficiary that would preclude this Board from recommending correction of the service members records to reflect he made a proper and timely election for former spouse...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04757
RESUME OF THE CASE: On 25 May 11, the Board considered and denied the applicants original request to make the same corrections to her records. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants original request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings (ROP) at Exhibit E. On 27 Feb 14, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration of her original application based upon clemency, and submitted two letters of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04923 2
As for the comments related to her fitness assessment in the contested referral EPR, the objectionable comments indicated the applicant received a does not meet standards rating on her fitness assessment (FA) because she failed to receive a passing score; however, said comments relate to a FA the applicant participated in after the close-out of the contested referral EPR. After a thorough review of the applicants complete submission, the evidence of record and the rebuttal, we find the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 04957
STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 12 June 2012, the Board considered and denied the applicants request that his uncharacterized service be changed to honorable. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. In an application dated 11 February 2014, the applicant seeks reconsideration of his earlier request. In addition, he request his RE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-1985-04145-3
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding his request, and the rationale for the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. The applicant submitted a DD Form 149, Application for Correction of Military Record, undated, requesting reconsideration of the Board’s prior decision denying upgrade of his undesirable discharge to honorable. Therefore, in view of the above and in the absence of new and relevant evidence, we find...