Upgrade.Vet

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500211

Original file (ND1500211.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-AOAN, USN

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20141021

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:

Authority for Discharge: MILPERSMAN 1910-124 [PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR
CHILDREN]

Applicant’s Request:     Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:        USNR (DEP)       20040929 - 20041115     Active:

Period of Service Under Review:

Date of Current Enlistment: 20041116    Age at Enlistment:
Period of Enlistment: Years Extension
Date of Discharge: 20080428     Highest Rank/Rate: AOAN
Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 12 Day(s)
Education Level:        AFQT: 42
Evaluation Marks:        Performance: 4.0 (1)     Behavior: 4.0 (1)       OTA: 3.67

Awards and Decorations (per DD 214):

Periods of UA/CONF:

NJP:

- 20050504:      Article (Larceny and wrongful appropriation)
         Article (General article)
         Awarded: Suspended:

- 20060517:      Article (Failure to obey order or regulation)
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM:

SPCM:

CC:

Retention Warning Counseling:

- 20050504:      For CO’s non-judicial punishment on 4 May 2005 for VUCMJ ART 121, Larceny and wrongful appropriation and ART 134, False or unauthorized pass offenses.

- 20060508:      For my alcohol-related incident, specifically suspected DUI (BAC unknown) on 060507.

- 20080312:      For not being able to comply with a Family Care Plan.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                 Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation:          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Other Documentation:
                  Additional Statements:
         From Applicant:          From/To Representation:          From/To Congress member:

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, Change 14, effective 29 March 2006 until 3 August 2010, Article 1910-124, SEPARATION BY REASON OF CONVENIENCE OF THE GOVERNMENT - PARENTHOOD.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part IV, Para 403m(7)(b), Presumption Concerning Court-Martial Specifications.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1. The Applicant contends that he had no misconduct or significant negative aspects to justify a GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) discharge after his wife died and he separated with a hardship discharge for parenthood.

Decision

Date: 20150225 Location: Washington D.C. Representation:

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. The Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included NAVPERS 1070/613 (Page 13) warnings, for of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article 92 (Failure to obey order or regulation), Article 121 (Larceny and wrongful appropriation), and Article 134 (General article). Based on the Applicant’s inability to maintain a family care plan, command administratively processed for separation. When notified of administrative separation processing using the procedure, the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified counsel, submit a written statement, and request a General Court-Martial Convening Authority review.

: (Decisional) () . The Applicant contends that he had no misconduct or significant negative aspects to justify a GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS) discharge after his wife died and he separated with a hardship discharge for parenthood. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, NDRB discerned no impropriety in the discharge action but did discern an inequity in the characterization of the Applicant’s service. The NDRB voted unanimously to upgrade the characterization of service to HONORABLE based on the absence of misconduct from approximately the time of his wife’s terminal diagnosis to his becoming unable to comply with the Navy Family Care Plan Policy approximately 16 months after his wife’s unfortunate passing. The record shows he exhausted all options in maintaining an adequate Family Care Plan and that his overall performance as reflected in his overall trait average was sufficient to rate an Honorable characterization had he been discharge at his end of obligated service. Relief granted.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN.

The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disabled American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000058

Original file (ND1000058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Issue 2: (Decisional) () The NDRB did review this Issue, but since the NDRB granted full relief based on Issue 1, no further response is required.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN. ” Additional Reviews : After a...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1001335

Original file (ND1001335.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues Decisional issue: The Applicant contends that her characterization of service at discharge was inequitable as it was based on one isolated incident in over 35 months of otherwise honorable service, she was discharged due to parenthood - not for misconduct, and her performance and conduct of record warrant a characterization of Honorable. The Applicant’s service record documents...
NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600738

Original file (ND0600738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The record reveals that the Applicant was properly notified for separation by reason of convenience of the government – parenthood on 20021120 with a least favorable characterization of general (under honorable conditions). You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .The names and votes of the...
NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00404

Original file (ND02-00404.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ND02-00404 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 020215, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable and the reenlistment code change from RE-4 to RE-1. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant's DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301058

Original file (ND1301058.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HARDSHIP/DEPENDENCY Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20030730 - 20040322Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20040323Age at Enlistment:Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20051014Highest Rank/Rate:SNLength of Service:Year(s)Month(s) 22 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 82EvaluationMarks:Performance:4.0(2)Behavior:4.0(2)OTA: 3.50Awards and Decorations (per...
NAVY | DRB | 2009_Navy | ND0900050

Original file (ND0900050.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214: Service/Medical Record: Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Substance Abuse: Criminal Records: Family/Personal Status: Community Service: References: Additional Statements: From Applicant: From Representation:From Congress member: Other Documentation: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301903

Original file (ND1301903.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
NAVY | DRB | 2010_Navy | ND1000177

Original file (ND1000177.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 20 August 2001, the Separation Authority approved the recommendation for administrative separation and the Applicant was discharged under Honorable conditions with a re-enlistment code of RE-3B (Parenthood or custody of minor children a member is unable to perform prescribed duties, or unable to comply with family care plan requirements-Ineligible to reenlist without a Commander, Navy Recruiting Command waiver). Pursuant to the Commanding Officer’s recommendation for administrative...
NAVY | DRB | 2013_Navy | ND1301682

Original file (ND1301682.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to:Narrative Reason change to:HARDSHIP Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USNR (DEP)20040830 - 20050720Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20050721Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: YearsExtensionDate of Discharge:20080408Highest Rank/Rate: FC3Length of Service: Year(s) Month(s) 19 Day(s)Education Level:AFQT: 62EvaluationMarks:Performance:3.0(1)Behavior:3.5(2)OTA: 3.17Awards and Decorations (per DD...
NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0501283

Original file (ND0501283.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s issues, as stated on the attached letter: “At the time of my separation process, I assumed that it was for parenthood reasons. 980922: Counseling following Applicant’s unauthorized absence from 0645 until 0900 as a result of non-availability of childcare.981014: Counseled for performance, behavior, duties and responsibilities. The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (E).A finding of misconduct due to the commission of a serious offense requires only...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2015_Navy | ND1500211

Similar Decisions