Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600738
Original file (ND0600738.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied


DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
 DISCHARGE REVIEW
DECISIONAL DOCUMENT
FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

ex-AOAN, USN
Docket No. ND06-00738

Applicant’s Request
The application for discharge review was received on 20060509 . The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable . The Applicant requests a documentary record discharge review. The Applicant did not designate a representative on the DD Form 293.
Decision

A documentary discharge review was conducted in Washington, D.C. on 20070301 . After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the NDRB determined that the Applicant’s discharge was proper but the characterization of service was inequit able. The Board’s vote was unanimous that the characterization of service shall change to HONORABLE but the narrative reason for separation shall remain Convenience of the Government due to Parenthood or Custody of Minor Children.





PART I - ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION

Decisional Issues

         No decisional issues.

 Documentation
In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 1)
Applicant’s DD Form 214 (Member 4)
 GI Bill Application
 Evaluation Report & Counseling Record (2 pgs)

PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE

 Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge):
         Inactive: USNR (DEP)     20001027 - 20001127       COG
          Active: None

Period of Service Under Review :
Date of Enlistment: 20001128              Date of Discharge: 20030205

Length of Service (years, months, days):

          Active: 0 2 0 2 0 8
         Inactive: None

 Time Lost During This Period (days):
         Unauthorized absence: None
         Confinement:              None

Age at Entry: 2 1
Years Contracted: 4

Education Level: 09       (GED)                      AFQT: 57

Highest Rate: AOAA

Final Enlisted Performance Evaluation Averages (number of marks):

 Performance: 4 .0 ( 1 )              Behavior: 3 .0 ( 1 )                           OTA: 3 . 5 0
Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations, and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, (as listed on the DD Form 214): Sea Service Deployment Ribbon, National Defense Service Medal, Navy Unit Commendation Ribbon .


Character, Narrative Reason, and Authority of Discharge (at time of issuance):

GENERAL (UNDER HONORABLE CONDITIONS)/PARENTHOOD OR CUSTODY OF MINOR CHILDREN, authority: MILPERSMAN, Article 1910-124 (formerly 3620215).
Chronological Listing of Significant Service Events :

011104:  Applicant advised that she failed Physical Fitness Assessment.

0 20912 :  Family Care Plan Certificate: Applicant indicated that she is unable to comply with the Navy's policy for dependent care.

0210 2 8:  Retention Warning: Advised of deficiency (Navy Family Care Plan Certificate indicating you cannot comply with the provisions of the program), notified of corrective actions and assistance available, advised of consequences of further deficiencies, and issued discharge warning.
021120 :  Applicant notified of intended recommendation for discharge with the least favorable characterization of service as general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the government-parenthood.

0 2112 6 :  Applicant advised of rights and having elected not to consult with counsel , e lected to waive all rights except the right to obtain copies of the documents used to support the basis for the separation .
030102 :  Commanding Officer, USS JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN 74), recommended discharge with an H onorable by reason of convenience of the government-parenthood as evidenced by her failure to comply with the Navy’s Family Care Program .

030127:  CNPC directed the Applicant's discharge with type warranted by service record by reason of parenthood or custody of minor child.

PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW

Discussion
The Applicant was discharged on 20030205 by reason of convenience of the government due to parenthood or custody of minor children (A) with a service characterization of general (under honorable conditions). After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper but in equitable (B and C). The Board presumed regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs (D).
By regulation, a discharge shall be deemed proper, unless it is determined that an error of fact, law, procedure, or discretion has substantially prejudiced the rights of the Applicant. The record reveals that the Applicant was properly notified for separation by reason of convenience of the government – parenthood on 200 21120 with a least favorable characterization of general (under honorable conditions). On 200 30102 , the Commanding Officer, USS JOHN C. STENNIS , recommended that the Applicant be separated with a n Honorable discharge by reason of convenience of the government - parenthood . On 200 30127 , C NPC directed the Applicant’s discharge with a characterization warranted by service by reason of parenthood or custody of minor child . A review of the Applicant’s service record convinced the Board that a preponderance of evidence exists to support the Applicant’s basis for separation by virtue of her inability t o comply with the Navy’s policy for dependent care. However, her record did not document any record of nonjudicial punishments, disciplinary actions, or other significant negative aspects during her period of service. Additionally, her performance evaluation averages are sufficient to merit an honorable discharge. Based upon the above review, the Board unanimously concluded that the Applicant’s discharge shall change to Honorable by reason of parenthood or custody of minor children. Relief granted.

 The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided an application is received, at the NDRB, within 15 years from the date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support post-service accomplishments or any other evidence related to the discharge at that time. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required.

Pertinent Regulation/Law (at time of discharge)

 A. The Naval Military Personnel Manual, (NAVPERS 15560C, re-issued October 2002, effective 22 Aug 2002 until present, Article 1910-124 (previously 3620215), Separation by reason of Convenience of the Government - Parenthood.

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 502, Propriety .

 C. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part V, Para 503, Equity .

 D. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs .


PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT
If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction . You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil ” .
The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

                  Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
                   Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
                   720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
                  Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023


Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600019

    Original file (ND0600019.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. The discharge shall change to Honorable by reason of convenience of the government due to parenthood or custody of minor children. The Applicant contends her narrative reason should be characterized as convenience of the Government or hardship.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500491

    Original file (ND0500491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. “Enlisted under a five year enlistment, with an honorable discharged and reenlisted and received general under honorable. 020730: CNPC directed the Applicant's discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the Government due to parenthood or custody of minor children.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00207

    Original file (ND04-00207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 PART II - SUMMARY OF SERVICE Prior Service (component, dates of service, type of discharge): Inactive: None Active: None Period of Service Under Review :Date of Enlistment: 971202 Date of Discharge: 000815 Length of Service...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00475

    Original file (ND04-00475.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND04-00475 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20040128. 001122: Commanding Officer recommended discharge with an honorable by reason of commission of a serious offense and convenience of the Government due to parenthood or custody of minor children. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).Issue 1: The Applicant...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2006_Navy | ND0600923

    Original file (ND0600923.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the Discharge Characterization of Service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. PART IV - INFORMATION FOR THE APPLICANT If you believe that the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction. The names, and votes of the members of the Board...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500028

    Original file (ND0500028.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable. Based on enclosures (2) through (7), I conclude that ET2 V_ cannot make adequate family care arrangements between her or her husband’s (EM2 A_ T. V_) next of kin and, therefore recommend she be separated from the naval service with a discharge characterized as Honorable.”030701: CNMPC directed the Applicant's discharge with characterization of type warranted by service record by...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00570

    Original file (ND01-00570.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The applicant was discharged on 000718 with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the Government due to parenthood or custody of minor children (A). The applicant requested a discharge upgrade in order to obtain GI Bill benefits. Relief denied.Although the applicant had no other issues, after careful review of the applicant’s service record, the Board determined that the applicant was...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00440

    Original file (ND03-00440.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    011121: Commanding Officer recommended discharge with a general (under honorable conditions) by reason of convenience of the Government due to parenthood or custody of minor children. Commanding Officer’s comments (verbatim): [AZ2 C_ (Applicant) reported to HS-5 on 15 February 2001 for her first sea duty assignment. ]020322: CNPC directed the Applicant's discharge by reason of convenience of the Government due to parenthood or custody of minor children with a characterization of type...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-01451

    Original file (ND03-01451.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, I have directed that SM3 S_ (Applicant) be separated from the naval service with a general discharge (under honorable conditions) for convenience of the government due to parenthood. The Applicant’s service record is marred by award of non-judicial punishment (NJP) on two separate occasions for violating the UCMJ, Article 86, thus substantiating the misconduct.The Applicant’s conduct, which forms the primary basis for determining the character of her service, reflects her...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-01067

    Original file (ND01-01067.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper and equitable (C and D).The applicant requested a change in the character of her discharge in order to secure veteran’s benefits. The following is provided for the benefit of the applicant. The applicant did not provide any of these documents.