Upgrade.Vet

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400142

Original file (MD1400142.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

ex-, USMC

Current Discharge and Applicant’s Request

Application Received: 20131016

Characterization of Service Received:

Narrative Reason for Discharge:
Authority for Discharge: MARCORSEPMAN

Applicant’s Request:      Characterization change to:
         Narrative Reason change to:

Summary of Service

Prior Service:
Inactive:         USMCR (DEP)       20090502 - 20090526     Active:

Pre-Service Drug Waiver:

Period of Service Under Review:
Date of Current Enlistment: 20090527     Age at Enlistment:
Period of E nlistment : Years Months
Date of Discharge: 20120727      H ighest Rank:
Length of Service : Y ea rs M on ths 01 D a y
Education Level:        AFQT: 50
MOS: 0621
Proficiency/Conduct M arks (# of occasions): /          Fitness R eports:

Awards and Decorations ( per DD 214):      ACM ( 2 )

Periods of UA / CONF :

NJP:

- 20120430 :       Article (Failure to obey order or regulation , inhaled (huffed) “Dust-off” as a mind-altering substance on 27 October 2011 at 3d Bn, 10 ^th MarReg, 2d MarDiv, Clinic)
         Article (False official statements , knowingly provided a fals e statement to the investigatin g officer Camp Lejeune PMO on 27 October 2011 at 3d Bn, 10 ^th MarReg, 2d MarDiv, Clinic )
         Awarded: Suspended:

SCM: SPCM: CC: Retention Warning Counseling :

Administrative Corrections to the Applicant’s DD 214

The NDRB did note administrative error on the original DD Form 214:

         “ ”

The NDRB will recommend to the Commandant of the Marine Corps , MMSB-13, that the DD 214 be corrected as appropriate.

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewed

Related to Military Service:
         DD 214:          Service/ Medical Record:          Other Records:

Related to Post-Service Period:
         Employment:               Finances:                 Education/Training:
         Health/Medical Records:          Rehabilitation/Treatment:                  Criminal Records:
         Personal Documentation :          Community Service:                References:
         Department of VA letter:                  Oth er Documentation:
                  Additional Statements :
         From Applicant:          From /To Representation:          From /To Congress m ember :

Pertinent Regulation/Law

A. The Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual, (MCO P1900.16F), effective 1 September 2001 until Present, Paragraph 6210, MISCONDUCT .

B. Secretary of the Navy Instruction 5420.174D of 22 December 2004, Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) Procedures and Standards, Part II, Para 211, Regularity of Government Affairs , Part V, Para 502, Propriety and Para 503, Equity .

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB)
DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENT

Applicant’s Issues

1.       The Applicant seeks an upgrade to reenlist in the Armed Forces.
2.       The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident in 38 months of service with no other adverse action.
3.       The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants consideration for an upgrade.

Decision

Date: 20 1 4 0605          Location: Washington D.C .         R epresentation :

By a vote of the Characterization shall .
By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall .

Discussion

The NDRB, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the character of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of g overnment al a ffairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the Applicant. T he Board did complete a thorough review of the circumstances that led to discharge and the discharge process to ensure discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. The Applicant’s record of service included for o f the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ): Article (Failure to obey order or regulation) and Article 107 (False official statement). In accordance with Marine Corps Separation and Retirement Manual p aragraph 6210.5, processing for administ rative separation is mandatory for a violation of the drug policy . The NDRB did not have the Applicant’s administrative separation package to determine whether or not the Applicant waived rights to consult with a qualified coun sel and submit a written statement . The Separation Code HKK1 on the Applicant’s DD Form 214 indicates he waived his rig ht to an administrative board.

: (Nondecisional) The Applicant seeks an upgrade to reenlist in the Armed Forces. Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the B oard for Correction of Naval Records can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his discharge was based on an isolated incident in 38 months of service with no other adverse action. Certain serious offenses , even though isolated, warrant separation from the service to maintain proper order and discipline. Violation of the d rug p olicy is one such offense requiring mandatory processing for administrative separation regardless of grade , performance, or time in service. This usually results in an unfavorable characterization of discharge or, at a maximum, a punitive discharge and possible confinement if adjudicated and awarded as part of a sentence by a special or general court-martial. The command did not pursue a punitive discharge but opted instead for the more lenient administrative discharge. Relief denied.

: (Decisional) ( ) . The Applicant contends his post-service conduct warrants consideration for an upgrade. The NDRB considers outstanding post-service conduct to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review. The Applicant provided a personal statement and three character references. The Applicant could have provided documentation as detailed in the Post-Service Conduct paragraph in the Addendum , however, completion of these items alone does not guarantee an upgrade from an unfavorable discharge as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case by case basis to determine if post-service conduct establishes that the in-service misconduct was an aberration. The Board determined the documentation submitted by the Applicant does not demonstrate if in-service misconduct was an aberration. The characterization of service received was appropriate considering the length of service and UCMJ violations. Relief denied.

Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries and discharge process, the Board found Therefore, the awarded characterization of service shall and the narrative reason for separation shall remain . The Applicant remains eligible for a personal appearance hearing for a period of fifteen years from the date of discharge. The Applicant is directed to the Addendum for additional information.

ADDENDUM: Information for the Applicant

Complaint Procedures : If you believe the decision in your case is unclear, not responsive to the issues you raised, or does not otherwise comport with the decisional document requirements of DoD Instruction 1332.28, you may submit a complaint in accordance with Enclosure (5) of that Instruction to the Joint Service Review Activity, OUSD (P&R) PI-LP, The Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301-4000. You should read Enclosure (5) of the Instruction before submitting such a complaint. The complaint procedure does not permit a challenge of the merits of the decision; it is designed solely to ensure that the decisional documents meet applicable requirements for clarity and responsiveness. You may view DoD Instruction 1332.28 and other Decisional Documents by going online at “ http://Boards.law.af.mil . ”

Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided the application is received at the NDRB within 15 years of the Applicant’s date of discharge. The Applicant can provide documentation to support any claims of post-service accomplishments or any additional evidence related to this discharge. Representation at a personal appearance hearing is recommended but not required. There are veterans organizations such as the American Legion and the Disable d American Veterans that are willing to provide guidance to former service members in their efforts to obtain a discharge upgrade. If a former member has been discharged for more than 15 years, has already been granted a personal appearance hearing or has otherwise exhausted their opportunities before the NDRB, the Applicant may petition the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR), 701 South Courthouse Road, Suite 1001, Arlington, VA 22204-2490 for further review.

Service Benefits: The U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) determines eligibility for post-service benefits, not the NDRB. There is no requirement or law that grants recharacterization solely on the issue of obtaining veterans benefits and this issue does not serve to provide a foundation upon which the Board can grant relief.

Employment/Educational Opportunities : The NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing employment or educational opportunities. Regulations limit the NDRB’s review to a determination of the propriety and equity of the discharge.

Reenlistment/RE-code: Since the NDRB has no jurisdiction over reenlistment, reentry, or reinstatement into the Navy, Marine Corps, or any other of the Armed Forces, the NDRB is not authorized to change a reenlistment code. Only the BCNR can make changes to reenlistment codes. Additionally, the NDRB has no authority to upgrade a discharge for the sole purpose of enhancing reenlistment opportunities. An unfavorable “RE” code is, in itself, not a bar to reenlistment. A request for a waiver can be submitted during the processing of a formal application for reenlistment through a recruiter.

Medical Conditions and Misconduct : DoD disability regulations do not preclude a disciplinary separation. Appropriate regulations stipulate that separations for misconduct take precedence over potential separations for other reasons. Whenever a member is being processed through the Physical Evaluation Board, and is processed subsequently for an administrative involuntary separation or is referred to a court martial for misconduct, the disability evaluation is suspended pending the outcome of the non-disability proceedings. If the action includes either a punitive or administrative discharge for misconduct or for any basis wherein an Other Than Honorable discharge is authorized, the medical board report is filed in the member’s terminated health record. Additionally, the NDRB does not have the authority to change a narrative reason for separation to one indicating a medical disability or other medical related reasons. Only the BCNR can grant this type of narrative reason change.

Automatic Upgrades - There is no law or regulation that provides for an unfavorable discharge to be upgraded based solely on the passage of time or good conduct subsequent to leaving naval service.

Post-Service Conduct : The NDRB is authorized to consider post-service factors in the recharacterization of a discharge. Outstanding post-service conduct, to the extent such matters provide a basis for a more thorough understanding of the Applicant’s performance and conduct during the period of service under review, is considered during Board reviews. Documentation to support a post-service conduct upgrade includes, but is not limited to: a verifiable continuous employment record; marriage and children’s birth certificates (if applicable); character witness statements; documentation of community or church service; certification of non-involvement with civil authorities; evidence of financial stability or letters of good standing from banks, credit card companies, or other financial institutions; attendance at or completion of higher education (official transcripts); and documentation of a drug-free lifestyle. The Applicant is advised that completion of these items alone does not guarantee the upgrade of an unfavorable discharge, as each discharge is reviewed by the Board on a case-by-case basis to determine if post-service accomplishments help demonstrate in-service misconduct was an aberration and not indicative of the member’s overall character.

Issues Concerning Bad-Conduct Discharges (BCD ): Because relevant and material facts stated in a court-martial specification are presumed by the NDRB to be established facts, issues relating to the Applicant’s innocence of charges for which he was found guilty cannot form a basis for relief. With respect to a discharge adjudged by a special court-martial, the action of the NDRB is restricted to upgrades based on clemency. Clemency is an act of leniency that reduces the severity of the punishment imposed. The NDRB does not have the jurisdictional authority to review a discharge or dismissal resulting from a general court-martial.

Board Membership: The names and votes of the members of the NDRB Board are recorded on the original of this document and may be obtained from the service records by writing to:

Secretary of the Navy Council of Review Boards
Attn: Naval Discharge Review Board
720 Kennon Street SE Rm 309
Washington Navy Yard DC 20374-5023

Similar Decisions

USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701104

Original file (MD0701104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

The Applicant was processed and received a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service and therefore Administrative Board was not required. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)20011010 - 20011210Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of...
USMC | DRB | 2011_Marine | MD1101544

Original file (MD1101544.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Types of Documents Submitted/reviewedRelated to Military Service: DD 214:Service/Medical Record:Other Records: Related to Post-Service Period: Employment: Finances: Education/Training: Health/Medical Records: Rehabilitation/Treatment: Criminal Records: Personal Documentation: Community Service: References: Department of VA letter: Other Documentation: Additional Statements:From Applicant: From/To Representation:From/ToCongress member: DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0701168

Original file (MD0701168.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

20051205 Rights Elected at Notification: Consult with Counsel Obtain Copies of Documents Submit Statement(s) (date) Not Submitted Administrative Board Commanding Officer Recommendation (date): (20060202) SJA review (date): (20060223) Separation Authority (date): CG, 1 st MARDIV (20060226) Basis for discharge directed: DUE TO Characterization directed: Date Applicant Discharged: 20060324 Types of Documents Submitted by Applicant and Considered By BoardRelated to Military Service: Service...
USMC | DRB | 2013_Marine | MD1300504

Original file (MD1300504.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Applicant’s Request:Characterization change to: Narrative Reason change to:COMPLETION OF REQUIRED ACTIVE SERVICE Summary of Service Prior Service: Inactive:USMCR (DEP)20100402 - 20101128Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Current Enlistment: 20101129Age at Enlistment: Period of Enlistment: Years MonthsDate of Discharge:20120824Highest Rank:Length of Service: Year(s)Month(s)26 Day(s)Education Level: AFQT:34MOS: 0311Proficiency/Conduct Marks (# of occasions):()/()Fitness Reports:...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700962

Original file (MD0700962.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Post Service DecisionBy a vote of the Characterization shall .By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT-PATTERN OF MISCONDUCT Date:20Location:Washington D.C.Representation: Discussion Issue 1: ().The Applicant contends that his problems are attributed to his personal issues the resulted in one incident in 42 months of service. After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700883

Original file (MD0700883.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s Summary of Service, Medical and Service Record Entries, Discharge Process and evidence submitted by the Applicant, the Board found that Summary of ServicePrior Service: Inactive: USMCR (DEP)19950627 - 19950724Active: Period of Service Under Review: Date of Enlistment: 19950725Years Contracted:; Extension: Date of Discharge:19971218Length of Service: 2 Yrs 4Mths23 DysLost Time:Days UA: Days Confined: Education...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601104

Original file (MD0601104.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: YESComplete Discharge Package: YESRegarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: EQUITABLE By a vote of the Characterization shall By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall remain CONDUCT TRIABLE BY COURT-MARTIAL (REQUEST FOR DISCHARGE FOR THE GOOD OF THE SERVICE)Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board: 1. Summary of Service:Prior Service: Inactive: NONEActive: 19900102 –...
USMC | DRB | 2006_Marine | MD0601156

Original file (MD0601156.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Complete Service Record: YES Complete Medical Record: YESComplete Discharge Package: YESRegarding propriety, the Board found the discharge: PROPER Regarding equity, the Board found the discharge: EQUITABLE By a vote of the Characterization shall UNDER OTHER THAN HONORABLE CONDITIONS By a vote of the Narrative Reason shall MISCONDUCT Applicant’s Issues, as summarized by the Board: 1. Elements of Discharge: [INVOLUNTARY] Date Notified: 20050307Basis for Discharge: DUE TO Least Favorable...
USMC | DRB | 2009_Marine | MD0901206

Original file (MD0901206.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

On 10 February 2006, the day following the BOI hearing, Maj S_, the counsel for the Applicant, received the BOI record of proceedings for his initial review. The Applicant failed to show how his case was materially impacted or prejudiced by not receiving the requested additional time for a rebuttal to the BOI findings.Summary: After a thorough review of the available evidence, to include the Applicant’s summary of service, record entries, and discharge process, the Board found Therefore,...
USMC | DRB | 2007_Marine | MD0700455

Original file (MD0700455.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

Medical/Service Record Entries Related to Characterization of Service or Basis for Discharge 20010702: Applicant counseled concerning an alcohol-related incident specifically getting drunk and going into an unauthorized absence status. Applicant chose not to make a statement.20031016: Medical Record: Reason for visit: Facial Injury due to fight/altercation: Diagnosis: Recommendation:20031201: MARCORSEPMAN 6105 counseling for pattern of misconduct, violation of Articles 86, 92,121, and 134. ...

Search Decisions

Decision Text

USMC | DRB | 2014_Marine | MD1400142

Similar Decisions